Literature DB >> 27695987

Variation in estimated glomerular filtration rate at dialysis initiation in children.

Allison B Dart1, Michael Zappitelli2, Manish M Sood3, R Todd Alexander4, Steven Arora5, Robin L Erickson6, Kristine Kroeker7, Andrea Soo8, Braden J Manns8, Susan M Samuel8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data guiding the timing of dialysis initiation in children are limited. We sought to determine current practice and secular trends in Canada with respect to the timing of dialysis initiation in children based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
METHODS: This observational study included incident chronic dialysis patients aged ≤21 years identified from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register who started dialysis in Canada between January 2001 and December 2010 at any of the nine participating Canadian centers (n = 583). Youth were categorized utilizing CKiD Schwartz eGFR into ≥10.5 (higher) or <10.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 (lower) eGFR groups. Differences at dialysis initiation by facility and region were examined, and secular trends were determined.
RESULTS: Median eGFR at dialysis initiation was 8.1 (interquartile range 5.4-11.0) ml/min/1.73 m2. Overall, 29 % of the patients started dialysis with an eGFR of ≥10.5 ml/min/1.73 m2. The proportion of children starting with higher eGFR increased from 27.3 % in 2001 to 35.4 % in 2010 (p = 0.04) and differed by treatment facility (12-70 %; p = 0.0001). Factors associated with higher eGFR at dialysis initiation in the adjusted regression model were female sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.48; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.14], genetic cause of end-stage kidney disease (OR 2.77; 95 % CI 1.37-5.58) and living ≥50 km from treatment facility (OR 1.47; 95 % CI 1.01-2.14).
CONCLUSIONS: One-third of the children were found to have initiated dialysis with an eGFR ≥10.5 ml/min/1.73 m2, however significant practice variation exists with respect to timing of dialysis initiation by treatment facility. More data is required to evaluate the clinical implications of this practice variation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Dialysis; Initiation; Timing; Variation; eGFR

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27695987     DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3483-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  34 in total

1.  How much peritoneal dialysis is required for the maintenance of a good nutritional state? Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.

Authors:  F X McCusker; B P Teehan; K E Thorpe; P R Keshaviah; D N Churchill
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.545

2.  A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine.

Authors:  G J Schwartz; G B Haycock; C M Edelmann; A Spitzer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Quality of life of young adults and adolescents with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Germaine Wong; Steve McTaggart; Paul Henning; Fiona Mackie; Robert P Carroll; Kirsten Howard; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Patterns and time of initiation of dialysis in US children.

Authors:  Mouin G Seikaly; Nina Salhab; Richard Browne
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  No survival benefit from early-start dialysis in a population-based, inception cohort study of Swedish patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  M Evans; G Tettamanti; O Nyrén; R Bellocco; C M Fored; C-G Elinder
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Early initiation of dialysis fails to prolong survival in patients with end-stage renal failure.

Authors:  Jamie P Traynor; Keith Simpson; Colin C Geddes; Christopher J Deighan; Jonathan G Fox
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 7.  Initiation of dialysis at higher GFRs: is the apparent rising tide of early dialysis harmful or helpful?

Authors:  Steven Jay Rosansky; William F Clark; Paul Eggers; Richard J Glassock
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  An instrumental variable approach finds no associated harm or benefit with early dialysis initiation in the United States.

Authors:  Julia J Scialla; Jiannong Liu; Deidra C Crews; Haifeng Guo; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Patti L Ephraim; Navdeep Tangri; Stephen M Sozio; Tariq Shafi; Dana C Miskulin; Wieneke M Michels; Bernard G Jaar; Albert W Wu; Neil R Powe; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  An assessment of dialysis provider's attitudes towards timing of dialysis initiation in Canada.

Authors:  Bikaramjit S Mann; Braden J Manns; Allison Dart; Joanne Kappel; Anita Molzahn; David Naimark; Sharon J Nessim; Steven Soroka; Michael Zappitelli; Manish M Sood
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2014-04-07

10.  Perceptions of pediatric nephrologists regarding timing of dialysis initiation in children in Canada.

Authors:  Jeremy A Saban; Michael Zappitelli; Susan M Samuel; Manish M Sood; R Todd Alexander; Steven Arora; Robin L Erickson; Kristine Kroeker; Braden J Manns; Allison B Dart
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-07-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Higher eGFR at Dialysis Initiation Is Not Associated with a Survival Benefit in Children.

Authors:  Erica Winnicki; Kirsten L Johansen; Michael D Cabana; Bradley A Warady; Charles E McCulloch; Barbara Grimes; Elaine Ku
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Comparison of three formulae for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in severely malnourished children at tertiary care facility.

Authors:  Misbah Anjum; Khemchand N Moorani; Bilquis Naeem; Shazia Kulsoom; Ashfaq Ahmed Memon
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 3.  Assessment of dialysis adequacy: beyond urea kinetic measurements.

Authors:  Lesley Rees
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.714

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.