Literature DB >> 20831629

No survival benefit from early-start dialysis in a population-based, inception cohort study of Swedish patients with chronic kidney disease.

M Evans1, G Tettamanti, O Nyrén, R Bellocco, C M Fored, C-G Elinder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how the timing of dialysis initiation is associated with mortality.
DESIGN: Population-based, prospective, observational cohort study.
SETTING: Clinical laboratories (n = 69) provided information on all patients in Sweden whose serum creatinine level for the first time and exceeded 3.4 mg dL(-1) (men) or 2.8 mg dL(-1) (women) between 20 May 1996 and 31 May 1998.
SUBJECTS: All patients (n = 901), aged 18-74 years, in whom the cause of serum creatinine elevation was chronic kidney disease, were included in the study; participants were interviewed and followed for 5-7 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Information on date of death was obtained from a national Swedish population register. Early-start dialysis [estimated glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine (eGFR) ≥7.5 mL min(-1) per 1.73 m(2)] was compared to late start of dialysis (eGFR <7.5 mL min(-1) per 1.73 m(2)), and no dialysis. Relative risk [hazard ratio (HR)] of death was modelled with time-dependent multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: Mean eGFR was 16.1 mL min(-1) per 1.73 m(2) at inclusion and 7.6 mL min(-1) per 1.73 m(2) at the start of dialysis. Among the 385 patients who started dialysis late, 36% died during follow-up compared to 52% of 323 who started early. The adjusted HR for death was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64, 1.10] among late versus early starters. The mortality among nondialysed patients increased significantly at eGFR below 7.5 mL min(-1) per 1.73 m(2) (HR 4.65; 95% CI 2.28, 9.49; compared to eGFR 7.5-10 mL min(-1) per 1.73 m(2)). After the start of dialysis, the mortality rate further increased. Compared to nondialysed patients with eGFR ≤15 mL min(-1) per 1.73 m(2), adjusted HR was 2.65 (95% CI 1.80, 3.89) for patients receiving dialysis.
CONCLUSION: We found no survival benefit from early initiation of dialysis.
© 2010 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20831629     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02280.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  24 in total

1.  Glomerular filtration rate and initiation of dialysis.

Authors:  Vianda S Stel; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Predialysis health, dialysis timing, and outcomes among older United States adults.

Authors:  Deidra C Crews; Julia J Scialla; Jiannong Liu; Haifeng Guo; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Patti L Ephraim; Bernard G Jaar; Stephen M Sozio; Dana C Miskulin; Navdeep Tangri; Tariq Shafi; Klemens B Meyer; Albert W Wu; Neil R Powe; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  End-stage renal disease in 2010: Timing of dialysis initiation and choice of dialysis modality.

Authors:  Bengt Lindholm; Simon Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Timing of dialysis initiation in transplant-naive and failed transplant patients.

Authors:  Miklos Z Molnar; Akinlolu O Ojo; Suphamai Bunnapradist; Csaba P Kovesdy; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Severe hyperparathyroidism in a pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patient treated with a very low protein diet.

Authors:  Eriko Ohta; Masanobu Akazawa; Yumi Noda; Shintaro Mandai; Shotaro Naito; Akihito Ohta; Eisei Sohara; Tomokazu Okado; Tatemitsu Rai; Shinichi Uchida; Sei Sasaki
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Comparative effectiveness of early versus conventional timing of dialysis initiation in advanced CKD.

Authors:  Deidra C Crews; Julia J Scialla; L Ebony Boulware; Sankar D Navaneethan; Joseph V Nally; Xiaobo Liu; Susana Arrigain; Jesse D Schold; Patti L Ephraim; Stacey E Jolly; Stephen M Sozio; Wieneke M Michels; Dana C Miskulin; Navdeep Tangri; Tariq Shafi; Albert W Wu; Karen Bandeen-Roche
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 7.  GFR at initiation of dialysis and mortality in CKD: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paweena Susantitaphong; Sarah Altamimi; Motaz Ashkar; Ethan M Balk; Vianda S Stel; Seth Wright; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Clinical Decision Making in a Patient with Stage 5 CKD--Is eGFR Good Enough?

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berns
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Estimated glomerular filtration rate at reinitiation of dialysis and mortality in failed kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Miklos Z Molnar; Elani Streja; Csaba P Kovesdy; Junichi Hoshino; Parta Hatamizadeh; Richard J Glassock; Akinlolu O Ojo; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Variation in estimated glomerular filtration rate at dialysis initiation in children.

Authors:  Allison B Dart; Michael Zappitelli; Manish M Sood; R Todd Alexander; Steven Arora; Robin L Erickson; Kristine Kroeker; Andrea Soo; Braden J Manns; Susan M Samuel
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.