Literature DB >> 27695520

Loss of genetic diversity as a consequence of selection in response to high pCO2.

Melanie M Lloyd1, April D Makukhov1, Melissa H Pespeni1.   

Abstract

Standing genetic variation may allow for rapid evolutionary response to the geologically unprecedented changes in global conditions. However, there is little known about the consequences of such rapid evolutionary change. Here, we measure genetic responses to experimental low and high pCO 2 levels in purple sea urchin larvae, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. We found greater loss of nucleotide diversity in high pCO 2 levels (18.61%; 900 μatm) compared to low pCO 2 levels (10.12%; 400 μatm). In the wild, this loss could limit the evolutionary capacity of future generations. In contrast, we found minimal evidence that purple sea urchin larvae physiologically respond to high pCO 2 through alternative splicing of transcripts (11 genes), despite a strong signal of alternative splicing between different developmental stages (1193 genes). However, in response to high pCO 2, four of the 11 alternatively spliced transcripts encoded ribosomal proteins, suggesting the regulation of translation as a potential response mechanism. The results of this study indicate that while the purple urchin presently may have enough standing genetic variation in response to rapid environmental change, this reservoir of resilience is a finite resource and could quickly diminish.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA sequencing; alternative splicing; nucleotide diversity; ocean acidification

Year:  2016        PMID: 27695520      PMCID: PMC5039325          DOI: 10.1111/eva.12404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Appl        ISSN: 1752-4571            Impact factor:   5.183


Introduction

Increasing atmospheric carbon due to anthropogenic activities lowers ocean pH causing changes to ocean carbonate chemistry (Doney et al. 2009; Hönisch et al. 2012). The consequences of ocean acidification for many ecologically and economically important marine organisms are slower growth, reduced fecundity, and higher mortality (Guinotte and Fabry 2008; Kroeker et al. 2010; Gaylord et al. 2011). To avoid such negative impacts of fast‐changing environmental conditions, organisms will have to move to more favorable conditions, physiologically acclimatize, or genetically adapt (Somero 2010; Hoffmann and Sgrò 2011). The ability of organisms with long generation times to rapidly adapt depends upon the amount of variation in present populations (Lande and Shannon 1996; Barrett and Schluter 2008). Past evolution in a temporally or spatially heterogeneous environment could allow for the maintenance of adequate standing genetic variation and physiological plasticity in present‐day populations required for surviving in projected future acidification conditions (Levene 1953; Lande and Shannon 1996; Dupont et al. 2010; Sunday et al. 2014). Many species along the west coast of North America, including the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, have evolved in a mosaic of seasonally and spatially variable temperature and pH due to the natural process of wind‐driven upwelling of cold, low‐pH waters from the deep ocean (Menge 2000; Feely et al. 2008). In a previous study, we found minimal negative morphological effects of high pCO2 enabled by selective survival of larvae with favorable alleles in high pCO2 conditions in genes related to ion homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and biomineralization (Pespeni et al. 2013b), supporting the hypothesis that evolution in a variable pCO2 environment could allow for adequate genetic variation to respond to increased pCO2. A common consequence of rapid adaptation is decreased genetic diversity in surviving populations, which would decrease future generations’ adaptive potential (Rodríguez‐Trelles and Rodríguez 1998; Jump and Penuelas 2005; Jump et al. 2009). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the changes in allele frequency observed in the purple sea urchin in response to increased pCO2 resulted in decreased genetic diversity. Results from this previous analysis indicate purple urchin larvae show minimal gene expression responses to elevated pCO2: only 32 genes were differentially up‐ or downregulated in experimentally acidified conditions (Pespeni et al. 2013b). This minimal response could have several potential explanations. Because the elevated pCO2 treatment (900 μatm) was within the range of what is experienced on occasion in nature with upwelling (Feely et al. 2008; Hofmann et al. 2011), it could be that the stressor, while strong enough to elicit selective survival of larvae with specific allelic variants, does not warrant a strong physiological gene expression response. Alternatively, it could be that the physiological responses involved other mechanisms that might not be detected through differences in transcript abundance, such as solute regulation, enzyme activities, post‐translational modifications, or alternative splicing of transcripts (Pörtner and Farrell 2008; Somero 2012; Pan et al. 2015). Alternative splice variation allows for structurally and functionally different proteins to be produced from a single gene or locus, providing functional diversity that exceeds what is possible through differential regulation of transcript abundance (Marden 2008; Irimia et al. 2009). In addition, differences in expression of alternative splice variants are not detected in standard gene expression analyses. To broaden our understanding of the tools available to purple urchin larvae to respond to acidified conditions, we tested their ability to physiologically acclimate through alternative splice variation. Purple urchins have evolved in a heterogeneous environment that may have facilitated the accumulation of adequate genetic variation for selective survival in high pCO2 conditions and/or the physiological capacity to acclimate to high pCO2. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the selective mortality in high pCO2 conditions would result in decreased genetic diversity in the surviving population. We further investigated the ability of the purple sea urchin to physiologically acclimate to high pCO2 through alternative splice variation rather than differential gene regulation.

Methods

Collection of sequence data

RNA‐sequencing data were generated in a previous acidification experiment (Pespeni et al. 2013b). In the previous study, adult sea urchins were collected from seven populations along the species range (Northern California: Bodega Bay and Van Damme; Oregon: Strawberry Hill and Fogarty Creek; Central California: Sand Hill Bluff, Terrance Point; and Southern California: Alegria). For each population, eggs from each of 10 females were fertilized by sperm from 10 males. Resulting embryos were reared in either low (400 μatm, pH 8.01 ± 0.03) or high (900 μatm, pH 7.72 ± 0.03) pCO2 conditions. These high pCO2 conditions are experienced in nature along the purple sea urchin species range due to the natural process of upwelling of low‐pH waters from the deep ocean (Feely et al. 2008; Hofmann et al. 2011). Larvae were sampled every 2 days through metamorphosis (~50 days) for morphometric analyses. For each population and each treatment, pools of ~1000 larvae were sampled from additional replicate cultures at 1 and 7 days postfertilization for RNA sequencing. RNA‐sequencing libraries were prepared for each sample (~1000 larvae per population per treatment per developmental time point) using Illumina's TruSeq kit (San Diego, CA, USA). Each library was sequenced on a single Illumina HiSeq lane yielding ~80 million quality‐filtered 50‐bp single‐end reads per sample. More details about the methods used to generate this RNA‐sequencing data and the water chemistry data can be found in the original publication(Pespeni et al. 2013b). To identify consistent responses to pCO2 across populations, we used the sequence data from seven populations as replicates for each of the four conditions: low and high pCO2 at 1 and 7 days postfertilization: day 1–400 μatm (D1‐400), day 1–900 μatm (D1‐900), day 7–400 μatm (D7‐400), and day 7–900 μatm (D7‐900). While there were no morphological or developmental differences between populations, previous results found a correlation between the allele frequencies at 318 SNPs and local pH conditions (Pespeni et al. 2013a). It is possible that cellular or metabolic differences may not have been captured by morphological and developmental metrics (Pan et al. 2015). As a consequence, there may have been population‐specific responses that were not captured in our analysis.

Nucleotide diversity

Starting with quality‐filtered RNA‐sequencing reads, we mapped reads to the S. purpuratus genome version 3.1 (Sodergren et al. 2006) using TopHat2 default parameters (max read mismatches 2, max gap length 2, max insertion/deletion 3, and min anchor length 8) (Trapnell et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2013). The resulting bam files produced one vcf file with VCFtools (Danecek et al. 2011). We filtered the vcf file (minimum depth: 50, maximum missing data: 0.8, minimum/maximum alleles: 2, and minGQ:20 corresponding to a 99% confidence of correctly identified genotype, indels removed) which was used to identify the location of all SNPs. We produced a separate vcf file per treatment group (Day1‐400, D1‐900, D7‐400, and D7‐900) and estimated nucleotide diversity (measured as π) on windows of 10 000 base pairs. We tested the difference in nucleotide diversity due to the effect of day, pCO2 level, and the interaction between day × pCO2 level using permutation analysis. First, metrics of π were log‐transformed to meet assumptions of normality. The values of log(π) of each window were randomly shuffled 10 000 times across all windows of the entire dataset and reassigned to treatment group. For each of the 10 000 permutations, we tested for the effect of day, pCO2 level, and the interaction between day × pCO2 level using an anova. We compared the permuted P‐values to the observed P‐value for each factor. Significance was determined as the proportion of permuted calculations less than the observed. The custom R script is provided in Data S1.

Accounting for allelic bias

Allelic mapping bias, where reads containing reference alleles at polymorphic sites will map more efficiently than reads containing alternative alleles at the same site, can confound differential expression analyses from short read RNA‐sequencing datasets (Degner et al. 2009; van de Geijn et al. 2015). We used WASP to identify and remove any reads containing reference alleles which specifically contributed to allelic mapping bias (van de Geijn et al. 2015). We used the bam files output from Tophat2 to produce one vcf file with VCFtools (Danecek et al. 2011) which was filtered and used to identify the location of all SNPs as described above. We used WASP to identify and remove reads which contained reference alleles which otherwise would not have mapped had they contained alternative alleles. We re‐assembled all remaining reads with TopHat2 using the same default parameters. It is worth noting that WASP only removes data that would contribute to allelic mapping bias by removing reads; it does not improve mapping by correctly mapping reads containing alternative alleles. Uncorrected allelic mapping bias would only incorrectly underestimate nucleotide diversity estimates because alternative alleles would map less frequently than they truly occur. Furthermore, we were interested in proportional differences in nucleotide diversity in pCO2 treatments through developmental time. Inefficient mapping of alternative alleles compared to reference alleles would be equal in all four treatment groups. False‐negative detection of polymorphisms would be equally probable in all four treatment groups. Therefore, polymorphic sites in day 7 treatments would not be disproportionally undetected. Thus, we used the quality‐filtered, rather than WASP‐filtered, data to estimate nucleotide diversity and the WASP‐filtered data in the following analysis of differential expression of alternative splice variants.

Differential expression of alternative splice variants

In the previous analysis of this dataset, only 32 genes were found to be differentially expressed due to pCO2 treatment. In this study, we investigated the possibility of differences in transcription arising from differentially expressed alternative splice variants that would be missed in standard differential gene expression analysis, which counts the number of reads that map to single transcripts representing gene sequences. We used DEXSeq to test for differential expression of alternative splice variants between treatment groups (Anders et al. 2012). DEXSeq tests for differential usage of individual exons in relation to the other exons in the same gene model. This eliminates the necessity of assembling entire transcripts across potentially complicated gene models. We used Python scripts provided with DEXSeq to align WASP‐filtered reads to defined exon bins of each gene model from the S. purpuratus transcriptome (Cameron et al. 2009; Tu et al. 2012, 2014). Expression data (counts per exon) were normalized. We tested the following predictors of differential exon usage individually: the effect of day, the effect of pCO2 level, the effect of pCO2 level accounting for the effect of day, and the interaction between day × pCO2 level. Full and reduced models for each predictor were compared as follows – effect of day: reduced model ~ sample + exon, full model ~ sample + exon + day × exon; effect of pCO2 level: reduced model ~ sample + exon, full model ~ sample + exon + pCO2 level × exon; effect of pCO2 level accounting for day: reduced model ~ sample + exon + day × exon, full model ~ sample + exon + day × exon + pCO2 level × exon; effect of the interaction between day and pCO2 level: reduced model ~ sample + exon + day × exon + pCO2 level × exon, full model ~ sample + exon + day × exon + pCO2 level × exon + day × pCO2 level × exon. We produced expression plots for each gene with significant differential exon usage (P < 0.1). To test whether any gene categories were significantly enriched in this analysis, we performed a rank‐based gene ontology analysis with adaptive clustering using the negative log transformation of the Benjamini Hochberg adjusted P value from each of the four above tested models (Dixon et al. 2015). Unlike other gene ontology enrichment analyses, this does not test for enrichment within a list of significant genes, but rather uses the whole distribution in a rank‐based test to identify GO terms enriched along a continuous metric such as P‐value. All code used is provided in Data S1.

Results

The overall nucleotide diversity (π) of all data was 0.00022 from 503 564 SNPs. There was a significant decrease in nucleotide diversity between day 1 and day 7 in both the low and high pCO2 treatment groups; however, there was a higher proportion of diversity lost in the high pCO2 group (18.61%) compared to the low pCO2 group (10.12%, Table 1). Permutation analyses indicate that the effect of day (P < 0.0001) and the interaction between day × pCO2 level (P < 0.0001) are both highly significant factors of nucleotide diversity (Fig. 1). Decreased genetic diversity between day 1 and day 7 was also measured as the number of polymorphic SNPs in each of the four treatment groups. Similar to the loss of diversity, as measured by π, the number of polymorphic SNPs decreased between day 1 and day 7 in both the low and high pCO2 treatment groups. Again, there was a larger proportion of SNPs lost in the high pCO2 group (8.15%) compared to the low pCO2 group (5.87%, Table 1).
Table 1

Summary statistics of nucleotide diversity (π) and number of SNPs

Low pCO2 High pCO2
Day 1
Mean π 0.001070.00114
Number of SNPs480 932497 167
Day 7
Mean π 0.000970.00093
Number of SNPs452 687456 671
Percent lost through time
Mean π 10.1218.61
Number of SNPs5.878.15
Figure 1

Permutation density plots of an anova to test the significance of (A) day, (B) 2 level, and (C) the interaction between day ×  2 level on nucleotide diversity as measured by π. Horizontal lines mark the observed P‐value for each factor.

Summary statistics of nucleotide diversity (π) and number of SNPs Permutation density plots of an anova to test the significance of (A) day, (B) 2 level, and (C) the interaction between day ×  2 level on nucleotide diversity as measured by π. Horizontal lines mark the observed P‐value for each factor. We identified 119 786 exons from 21 108 genes in our RNA‐sequencing dataset. In total, 2076 exons belonging to 1201 genes were differentially expressed in our analyses. DEXSeq identifies differentially expressed exons in relation to other exons within the same gene model. This accounts for the overall expression differences at the gene level. Differential expression of one or more exon within one gene between treatments implies alternative splice variation within that gene (see Figure S1 for an example output of differential exon usage, gene ID WHL22.665129: SPU_010393, telomere elongation helicase‐like). The vast majority of genes with differential exon usage (1193 genes) were alternatively spliced between day 1 and day 7 and represent the alternative splice variation between two distinct developmental stages in purple urchin larvae, hatched blastula, and four‐arm plutei (Table S1). Among the genes with differentially expressed exons, the average number of differentially expressed exons per gene was 1.73, indicating that alternatively spliced transcripts may result from only one or two exon changes. There were far fewer differentially expressed exons in different pCO2 treatments: only nine exons belonging to eight genes were differentially expressed due to pCO2 level alone (all low pCO2 versus all high pCO2 samples); four exons belonging to three genes were differentially expressed due to pCO2 level while accounting for the effect of day; and one exon belonging to one gene was differentially expressed due to the interaction between day × pCO2 level (Tables 2 and 3). We also used enrichment analyses to identify suites of genes related by biological function that were alternatively spliced in these models. We found a further 41 (day), 37 (condition), 36 (condition accounting for day), and 42 (condition × day) GO terms enriched in these respective analyses (FDR < 0.1). Genes with significant differential exon usage between pCO2 level were largely ribosomal genes (Table 3). Furthermore, while the number of enriched GO terms was similar in the model testing for the effect of day and the three models testing for the effects of pCO2 level, there was a clear pattern where ribosomal and translation genes were enriched in models testing for the effects of pCO2 level, but not enriched in the model testing for the effect of day (Fig. 2).
Table 2

Summary statistics of differential exon expression (FDR P < 0.05)

Effect testedExons differentially expressedGenes with differentially expressed exonsNumber of GO terms enriched (FDR < 0.1)
Day2067119341
pCO2 level9837
pCO2 level accounting for day4336
pCO2 level × day1142
Table 3

Annotations of genes with significant differential exon expression specific to pCO2 level

WHL codeSignificant FactorsAnnotation
22.38329 pCO2 levelNucleoporin 205 kDa and membrane progestin receptor gamma
22.442792 pCO2 levelRibosomal protein S2
22.445772 pCO2 levelRibosomal protein S7
22.665129 pCO2 levelTelomere elongation helicase‐like
22.510905 pCO2 level, dayApolipoprotein B
22.262267 pCO2 level, dayFolylpolyglutamate synthase
22.667356 pCO2 level, dayRibosomal protein L5
22.648077 pCO2 level, pCO2 level accounting for dayTumor protein, translationally controlled 1
22.241670 pCO2 level accounting for dayATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, alpha subunit
22.186040 pCO2 level accounting for dayRibosomal protein L23a
22.563676 pCO2 level × dayAristaless‐like homeobox 1‐like, Cart1/Alx3/Alx4 subfamily‐like
Figure 2

Enriched GO terms of genes with differential exon usage between (A) day, (B) 2 levels, (C), 2 levels accounting for the difference between days, and (D) the interaction between day ×  2 level. Dendrograms indicate shared genes among GO terms; fractions indicate the number of genes with uncorrected P < 0.05 compared to the total number of genes in a category. Only enriched GO terms with FDR P < 0.05 were included on the figure.

Summary statistics of differential exon expression (FDR P < 0.05) Annotations of genes with significant differential exon expression specific to pCO2 level Enriched GO terms of genes with differential exon usage between (A) day, (B) 2 levels, (C), 2 levels accounting for the difference between days, and (D) the interaction between day ×  2 level. Dendrograms indicate shared genes among GO terms; fractions indicate the number of genes with uncorrected P < 0.05 compared to the total number of genes in a category. Only enriched GO terms with FDR P < 0.05 were included on the figure.

Discussion

The results of this study show decreased nucleotide diversity following evolutionary change in response to increased pCO2 in purple sea urchin larvae. There was significant loss in genetic diversity of cultured larvae between day 1 and day 7 in both high and low pCO2 conditions; however, the percent nucleotide diversity lost in high pCO2 was significantly more than in low pCO2 (P < 0.0001, Table 1). pCO2 treatment alone, pooled across days, was not a significant predicting factor of nucleotide diversity, indicating the negative effect of increased pCO2 acts through developmental time (Fig. 1). A similar pattern was seen in the total number of polymorphic SNPs of the four experimental treatment groups. The total number of polymorphic SNPs decreased between day 1 and day 7 in both high and low pCO2 conditions; however, the number of polymorphic SNPs lost in high pCO2 was significantly more than in low pCO2. SNPs that go to fixation will lower standing genetic diversity in a population and be lost except in the event of dispersal of individuals carrying unique genetic variants or until a new neutral or beneficial mutation occurs. Previous experimental results from which our dataset arose concluded that the larvae reared in high pCO2 did not show any major differences in morphology and growth rates compared to larvae in low pCO2. Overall, larvae at high pCO2 were 4–5% smaller in length, but larvae in both conditions were equally able to metamorphose, indicating no substantial difference in developmental trajectory (Pespeni et al. 2013b). Our previous study also identified changes in allele frequencies and amino acid changing polymorphisms through developmental time in specific classes of genes related to ion homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and biomineralization in larvae reared in high pCO2 while changes were random with respect to protein function in low pCO2. These results suggest there is adequate present‐day genetic diversity to allow for selective survival of larvae with specific alleles well suited for high pCO2. To add to this conceptual model, in this study, we found that the nucleotide diversity of the surviving larvae had decreased more in high pCO2 than for larvae reared in low pCO2, 83% more loss of diversity in high pCO2 compared to low (18.61% vs 10.12%). We now have a more complete understanding of the evolutionary effects of high pCO2 on the purple sea urchin: rapid evolutionary change leading to decreased genetic diversity with few transcriptional changes.

Consequences of reduced nucleotide diversity

Generally, the present‐day populations of purple urchins have high genetic diversity (Pespeni and Palumbi 2013), but the results of this study indicate that this could change in the near future due to anthropogenic environmental changes. Genetic diversity has a fundamental role in the future evolutionary trajectory of a species. Just as present‐day populations need a high genetic diversity to rapidly adapt, future generations will need equally as much genetic diversity to adapt to future changes (Barrett and Schluter 2008). Reduced genetic diversity has been shown to decrease disease resistance (Spielman et al. 2004) as well as resilience to environmental disturbance (Hughes and Stachowicz 2004) and extreme temperatures (Reusch et al. 2005). Although the genetic variation is currently high, the rapid rate of evolutionary change could outpace the rate of adaptation of this species. Future studies are necessary to understand how the loss of genetic diversity will impact the ability of future generations to continue to cope with environmental change in the purple sea urchin.

Alternative splicing

In accord with our previous differential expression analysis of the dataset (Pespeni et al. 2013b), the present study found very few transcripts differentially expressed between pCO2 levels. The number of significantly alternatively spliced genes (FDR P < 0.1) was dramatic between days, but not between pCO2 levels (Table 2). There was no overlap between the genes significantly differentially expressed in the previous analysis and the genes significantly alternatively spliced in this analysis. Interestingly, four of the eleven alternatively spliced genes between pCO2 conditions were ribosomal genes (Table 3, Fig. 2). This may suggest physiological changes in the purple urchin in response to pCO2 are not transcriptionally regulated, but regulated at the post‐transcription or translation levels and merits further investigation. Recent studies show the regulation of ribosomes may be highly specialized. Alternative splicing of ribosomal mRNA may lead to specialized ribosomes which have much larger downstream effects on the translation of the entire proteome than the simple up‐ or downregulation of single gene transcripts (Xue and Barna 2012). There are many paralogous gene copies encoding ribosomal proteins, although it remains controversial to what extent the paralogs are biologically functional (Xue and Barna 2012; Zhang et al. 2013). It is possible that the difference in exon usage seen here in this study is due to transcription of multiple paralogous ribosomal genes and not alternative splice variation of single genes.

Response to a high pCO2 level that is within the natural range

As mentioned, previous results from which our dataset arose concluded that the larvae reared in high pCO2 showed minimal morphological effects (4–5% reduction in body length) and no developmental delay compared to larvae reared in low pCO2 (Pespeni et al. 2013b). These results differ from some previous reports of negative effects of elevated pCO2 on sea urchin growth and development in acidified conditions (O'Donnell et al. 2009; Stumpp et al. 2011; Byrne et al. 2013), but not others (Yu et al. 2011). Some previous studies found stronger negative effects of increased pCO2 on the morphology and development of sea urchin larvae (O'Donnell et al. 2009; Stumpp et al. 2011; Byrne et al. 2013). However, similar to our results, Yu et al. (2011) reported that larvae reared at pCO2 1000 μatm decreased in size by <7% (exact number not reported) compared to larvae reared in low pCO2 which is comparable to the 4–5% size decrease seen here. It is possible that these discrepancies were due to differences in densities of larval culture. Our larval cultures were 10 times less dense than those used in the studies mentioned and may be more ecologically relevant (Strathmann 1987). We hypothesize that the higher larval densities used in other studies may have interacted with elevated pCO2 to exacerbate the negative effects on developing larvae, although this remains to be tested. Effects of increased pCO2 have been shown to interact with such effects as food availability, where the overall effect of acidification is much greater in food‐limited urchin larval cultures (Pan et al. 2015). The minimal negative effects of high pCO2 observed in this study may have been because the experimental high pCO2 condition was not high enough to elicit a transcriptional response in our experimental conditions. Purple urchins along the west coast of North America have evolved in a heterogeneous environment of seasonally and spatially variable temperature and pH due to the natural process of wind‐driven upwelling of cold, low‐pH waters from the deep ocean (Menge 2000; Feely et al. 2008). They naturally experience pH conditions similar to that of our high pCO2 experimental treatment daily or weekly (Hofmann et al. 2011; Yu et al. 2011). It is possible that they are able to manage surviving in high pCO2 conditions up to a point, higher than we used in this study (Dorey et al. 2013). In the future, it will be important to investigate these responses in higher pCO2 conditions as well as more variable pCO2 conditions. While living in a variable environment likely allows for the maintenance of high genetic variation, it may not necessarily translate into higher survivorship in the future ocean. Future global change will come with increased variability and lower predictability, pushing organisms outside of their physiological limit at some times, but not at others (Dorey et al. 2013). This unpredictable environment may be the most difficult factor to adapt to (Hamdoun and Epel 2007). Understanding the ability as well as the long‐term effect of rapid adaptation in the face of near future environmental stressors is essential to understanding long‐term species survival. This information is necessary to identify potential ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in an environment with higher pCO2, changing climate, and acidifying ocean. Results of our previous paper taken with this study indicate that genetic diversity is required to adapt to anthropogenic environmental changes, but is subsequently lost through this process of adaptation. The conservation of this genetic diversity within species is critical because of the expectation that its loss could render populations and species less able to adapt to ongoing or new environmental changes.

Data archiving statement

Raw data used in this study have been archived in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (Acc. No. SRA SRP075627). Figure S1. An example output of DEXSeq for significant gene WHL 22.665129. Click here for additional data file. Table S1. DEXSeq results table for comparison of differential exon expression between day 1 and day 7. Click here for additional data file. Data S1. Includes all code used for data analysis. Click here for additional data file.
  42 in total

1.  Top-down and bottom-up community regulation in marine rocky intertidal habitats.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol       Date:  2000-07-30       Impact factor: 2.171

2.  Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance.

Authors:  A Randall Hughes; John J Stachowicz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity.

Authors:  Thorsten B H Reusch; Anneli Ehlers; August Hämmerli; Boris Worm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Embryo stability and vulnerability in an always changing world.

Authors:  Amro Hamdoun; David Epel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Quantitative and evolutionary biology of alternative splicing: how changing the mix of alternative transcripts affects phenotypic plasticity and reaction norms.

Authors:  J H Marden
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Adaptation from standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Ecology. Physiology and climate change.

Authors:  Hans O Pörtner; Anthony P Farrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Ocean acidification and its potential effects on marine ecosystems.

Authors:  John M Guinotte; Victoria J Fabry
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Evidence for upwelling of corrosive "acidified" water onto the continental shelf.

Authors:  Richard A Feely; Christopher L Sabine; J Martin Hernandez-Ayon; Debby Ianson; Burke Hales
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

Authors:  Erica Sodergren; George M Weinstock; Eric H Davidson; R Andrew Cameron; Richard A Gibbs; Robert C Angerer; Lynne M Angerer; Maria Ina Arnone; David R Burgess; Robert D Burke; James A Coffman; Michael Dean; Maurice R Elphick; Charles A Ettensohn; Kathy R Foltz; Amro Hamdoun; Richard O Hynes; William H Klein; William Marzluff; David R McClay; Robert L Morris; Arcady Mushegian; Jonathan P Rast; L Courtney Smith; Michael C Thorndyke; Victor D Vacquier; Gary M Wessel; Greg Wray; Lan Zhang; Christine G Elsik; Olga Ermolaeva; Wratko Hlavina; Gretchen Hofmann; Paul Kitts; Melissa J Landrum; Aaron J Mackey; Donna Maglott; Georgia Panopoulou; Albert J Poustka; Kim Pruitt; Victor Sapojnikov; Xingzhi Song; Alexandre Souvorov; Victor Solovyev; Zheng Wei; Charles A Whittaker; Kim Worley; K James Durbin; Yufeng Shen; Olivier Fedrigo; David Garfield; Ralph Haygood; Alexander Primus; Rahul Satija; Tonya Severson; Manuel L Gonzalez-Garay; Andrew R Jackson; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Mark Tong; Christopher E Killian; Brian T Livingston; Fred H Wilt; Nikki Adams; Robert Bellé; Seth Carbonneau; Rocky Cheung; Patrick Cormier; Bertrand Cosson; Jenifer Croce; Antonio Fernandez-Guerra; Anne-Marie Genevière; Manisha Goel; Hemant Kelkar; Julia Morales; Odile Mulner-Lorillon; Anthony J Robertson; Jared V Goldstone; Bryan Cole; David Epel; Bert Gold; Mark E Hahn; Meredith Howard-Ashby; Mark Scally; John J Stegeman; Erin L Allgood; Jonah Cool; Kyle M Judkins; Shawn S McCafferty; Ashlan M Musante; Robert A Obar; Amanda P Rawson; Blair J Rossetti; Ian R Gibbons; Matthew P Hoffman; Andrew Leone; Sorin Istrail; Stefan C Materna; Manoj P Samanta; Viktor Stolc; Waraporn Tongprasit; Qiang Tu; Karl-Frederik Bergeron; Bruce P Brandhorst; James Whittle; Kevin Berney; David J Bottjer; Cristina Calestani; Kevin Peterson; Elly Chow; Qiu Autumn Yuan; Eran Elhaik; Dan Graur; Justin T Reese; Ian Bosdet; Shin Heesun; Marco A Marra; Jacqueline Schein; Michele K Anderson; Virginia Brockton; Katherine M Buckley; Avis H Cohen; Sebastian D Fugmann; Taku Hibino; Mariano Loza-Coll; Audrey J Majeske; Cynthia Messier; Sham V Nair; Zeev Pancer; David P Terwilliger; Cavit Agca; Enrique Arboleda; Nansheng Chen; Allison M Churcher; F Hallböök; Glen W Humphrey; Mohammed M Idris; Takae Kiyama; Shuguang Liang; Dan Mellott; Xiuqian Mu; Greg Murray; Robert P Olinski; Florian Raible; Matthew Rowe; John S Taylor; Kristin Tessmar-Raible; D Wang; Karen H Wilson; Shunsuke Yaguchi; Terry Gaasterland; Blanca E Galindo; Herath J Gunaratne; Celina Juliano; Masashi Kinukawa; Gary W Moy; Anna T Neill; Mamoru Nomura; Michael Raisch; Anna Reade; Michelle M Roux; Jia L Song; Yi-Hsien Su; Ian K Townley; Ekaterina Voronina; Julian L Wong; Gabriele Amore; Margherita Branno; Euan R Brown; Vincenzo Cavalieri; Véronique Duboc; Louise Duloquin; Constantin Flytzanis; Christian Gache; François Lapraz; Thierry Lepage; Annamaria Locascio; Pedro Martinez; Giorgio Matassi; Valeria Matranga; Ryan Range; Francesca Rizzo; Eric Röttinger; Wendy Beane; Cynthia Bradham; Christine Byrum; Tom Glenn; Sofia Hussain; Gerard Manning; Esther Miranda; Rebecca Thomason; Katherine Walton; Athula Wikramanayke; Shu-Yu Wu; Ronghui Xu; C Titus Brown; Lili Chen; Rachel F Gray; Pei Yun Lee; Jongmin Nam; Paola Oliveri; Joel Smith; Donna Muzny; Stephanie Bell; Joseph Chacko; Andrew Cree; Stacey Curry; Clay Davis; Huyen Dinh; Shannon Dugan-Rocha; Jerry Fowler; Rachel Gill; Cerrissa Hamilton; Judith Hernandez; Sandra Hines; Jennifer Hume; Laronda Jackson; Angela Jolivet; Christie Kovar; Sandra Lee; Lora Lewis; George Miner; Margaret Morgan; Lynne V Nazareth; Geoffrey Okwuonu; David Parker; Ling-Ling Pu; Rachel Thorn; Rita Wright
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Geographical gradients in selection can reveal genetic constraints for evolutionary responses to ocean acidification.

Authors:  Juan Diego Gaitán-Espitia; Dustin Marshall; Sam Dupont; Leonardo D Bacigalupe; Levente Bodrossy; Alistair J Hobday
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Does a complex life cycle affect adaptation to environmental change? Genome-informed insights for characterizing selection across complex life cycle.

Authors:  Molly A Albecker; Laetitia G E Wilkins; Stacy A Krueger-Hadfield; Samuel M Bashevkin; Matthew W Hahn; Matthew P Hare; Holly K Kindsvater; Mary A Sewell; Katie E Lotterhos; Adam M Reitzel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Will life find a way? Evolution of marine species under global change.

Authors:  Piero Calosi; Pierre De Wit; Peter Thor; Sam Dupont
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Omics approaches for conservation biology research on the bivalve Chamelea gallina.

Authors:  Federica Carducci; Maria Assunta Biscotti; Emiliano Trucchi; Maria Elisa Giuliani; Stefania Gorbi; Alessandro Coluccelli; Marco Barucca; Adriana Canapa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.