Nooshin Razani1, Michael A Kohn2, Nancy M Wells3, Doug Thompson4, Hanna Hamilton Flores4, George W Rutherford2. 1. Center for Nature and Health, UCSF Benioff Children's, Hospital Oakland, 747 52nd St, Oakland, CA 94609, USA. Electronic address: nrazani@mail.cho.org. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. 3. Department of Design and Environmental Analysis, College of Human Ecology, 1411 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. 4. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, 50 University Hall #7360, 94720-7360, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contact with nature improves human health; stress reduction is a mediating pathway. Stay Healthy in Nature Everyday (SHINE) is a stress reduction and health promotion intervention for low-income families at an urban Federally Qualified Health Center. We plan to evaluate two service-delivery models for SHINE and present here the intervention design and evaluation protocol. METHODS: Behavioral change theory and environmental education literature informed the intervention. Outcomes were selected after review of the literature and field tested procedures to determine what was feasible and ethical in a busy clinic serving vulnerable populations. DESIGN: We designed a randomized controlled trial to examine two levels of intensity in behavioral counseling about the health benefits of nature. Dyads consisting of a caregiver and a child aged 4 to 18 who access our pediatric primary care center are eligible. All dyads receive a pediatrician's recommendation to visit parks to experience nature and written resources (a "park prescription"). The intervention group receives added case management and an invitation to three group outings into nature with transportation, meals and activities provided. Primary outcomes measured at baseline, one month and three months post-enrollment are caregiver stress measured by PSS-10 score and salivary α-amylase; secondary outcomes are park prescriptions adherence, physical activity recorded by pedometer and journaling, loneliness, family cohesion and affinity to nature as measured by a validated scales. Both groups receive incentives to participation. DISCUSSION: Our intervention represents a feasible integration of recent research findings on the health benefits of nature and primary care practice.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Contact with nature improves human health; stress reduction is a mediating pathway. Stay Healthy in Nature Everyday (SHINE) is a stress reduction and health promotion intervention for low-income families at an urban Federally Qualified Health Center. We plan to evaluate two service-delivery models for SHINE and present here the intervention design and evaluation protocol. METHODS: Behavioral change theory and environmental education literature informed the intervention. Outcomes were selected after review of the literature and field tested procedures to determine what was feasible and ethical in a busy clinic serving vulnerable populations. DESIGN: We designed a randomized controlled trial to examine two levels of intensity in behavioral counseling about the health benefits of nature. Dyads consisting of a caregiver and a child aged 4 to 18 who access our pediatric primary care center are eligible. All dyads receive a pediatrician's recommendation to visit parks to experience nature and written resources (a "park prescription"). The intervention group receives added case management and an invitation to three group outings into nature with transportation, meals and activities provided. Primary outcomes measured at baseline, one month and three months post-enrollment are caregiver stress measured by PSS-10 score and salivary α-amylase; secondary outcomes are park prescriptions adherence, physical activity recorded by pedometer and journaling, loneliness, family cohesion and affinity to nature as measured by a validated scales. Both groups receive incentives to participation. DISCUSSION: Our intervention represents a feasible integration of recent research findings on the health benefits of nature and primary care practice.
Authors: James R Hébert; Swann Arp Adams; John R Ureda; Vicki M Young; Heather M Brandt; Sue P Heiney; Jessica S Seel; Daniela B Friedman Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Tamara Brown; Theresa Hm Moore; Lee Hooper; Yang Gao; Amir Zayegh; Sharea Ijaz; Martha Elwenspoek; Sophie C Foxen; Lucia Magee; Claire O'Malley; Elizabeth Waters; Carolyn D Summerbell Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-07-23
Authors: Nooshin Razani; Saam Morshed; Michael A Kohn; Nancy M Wells; Doug Thompson; Maoya Alqassari; Amaka Agodi; George W Rutherford Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Justine S Sefcik; Michelle C Kondo; Heather Klusaritz; Elisa Sarantschin; Sara Solomon; Abbey Roepke; Eugenia C South; Sara F Jacoby Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Michelle C Kondo; Kehinde O Oyekanmi; Allison Gibson; Eugenia C South; Jason Bocarro; J Aaron Hipp Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stephanie L Orstad; Kristin Szuhany; Kosuke Tamura; Lorna E Thorpe; Melanie Jay Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nooshin Razani; Nancy K Hills; Doug Thompson; George W Rutherford Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 3.390