M A Leavell1, J A Leiferman2, M Gascon3,4,5, F Braddick6,7, J C Gonzalez6, J S Litt8,9. 1. University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA. 2. Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA. 3. ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain. 5. CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. 6. Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya (ASPCAT), Barcelona, Spain. 7. Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 8. University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA. jill.litt@colorado.edu. 9. Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), C/Doctor Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. jill.litt@colorado.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent reports of a "loneliness epidemic" in the USA are growing along with a robust evidence base that suggests that loneliness and social isolation can compromise physical and psychological health. Screening for social isolation among at-risk populations and referring them to nature-based community services, resources, and activities through a social prescribing (SP) program may provide a way to connect vulnerable populations with the broader community and increase their sense of connectedness and belonging. In this review, we explore opportunities for social prescribing to be used as a tool to address connectedness through nature-based interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Social prescribing can include a variety of activities linked with voluntary and community sector organizations (e.g., walking and park prescriptions, community gardening, farmers' market vouchers). These activities can promote nature contact, strengthen social structures, and improve longer term mental and physical health by activating intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental processes. The prescriptions are appropriate for reaching a range of high-risk populations including moms who are minors who are minors, recent immigrants, older adults, economically and linguistically isolated populations, and unlikely users of nature and outdoor spaces. More research is needed to understand the impact of SPs on high-risk populations and the supports needed to allow them to feel at ease in the outdoors. Additionally, opportunities exist to develop technologically and socially innovative strategies to track patient participation in social prescriptions, monitor impact over time, and integrate prescribing into standard health care practice.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent reports of a "loneliness epidemic" in the USA are growing along with a robust evidence base that suggests that loneliness and social isolation can compromise physical and psychological health. Screening for social isolation among at-risk populations and referring them to nature-based community services, resources, and activities through a social prescribing (SP) program may provide a way to connect vulnerable populations with the broader community and increase their sense of connectedness and belonging. In this review, we explore opportunities for social prescribing to be used as a tool to address connectedness through nature-based interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Social prescribing can include a variety of activities linked with voluntary and community sector organizations (e.g., walking and park prescriptions, community gardening, farmers' market vouchers). These activities can promote nature contact, strengthen social structures, and improve longer term mental and physical health by activating intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental processes. The prescriptions are appropriate for reaching a range of high-risk populations including moms who are minors who are minors, recent immigrants, older adults, economically and linguistically isolated populations, and unlikely users of nature and outdoor spaces. More research is needed to understand the impact of SPs on high-risk populations and the supports needed to allow them to feel at ease in the outdoors. Additionally, opportunities exist to develop technologically and socially innovative strategies to track patient participation in social prescriptions, monitor impact over time, and integrate prescribing into standard health care practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
Loneliness; Nature-based; Psychosocial processes; Social connectedness; Social isolation; Social prescriptions
Authors: Jill S Litt; Mah-J Soobader; Mark S Turbin; James W Hale; Michael Buchenau; Julie A Marshall Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: James Hale; Corrine Knapp; Lisa Bardwell; Michael Buchenau; Julie Marshall; Fahriye Sancar; Jill S Litt Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2011-05-01 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Brea L Perry; Will R McConnell; Max E Coleman; Adam R Roth; Siyun Peng; Liana G Apostolova Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-09-05 Impact factor: 16.655
Authors: Courtney K Blackwell; Maxwell Mansolf; Phillip Sherlock; Jody Ganiban; Julie A Hofheimer; Charles J Barone; Traci A Bekelman; Clancy Blair; David Cella; Shaina Collazo; Lisa A Croen; Sean Deoni; Amy J Elliott; Assiamira Ferrara; Rebecca C Fry; Richard Gershon; Julie B Herbstman; Margaret R Karagas; Kaja Z LeWinn; Amy Margolis; Rachel L Miller; T Michael O'Shea; Christina A Porucznik; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 9.703
Authors: Jean C Bikomeye; Sima Namin; Chima Anyanwu; Caitlin S Rublee; Jamie Ferschinger; Ken Leinbach; Patricia Lindquist; August Hoppe; Lawrence Hoffman; Justin Hegarty; Dwayne Sperber; Kirsten M M Beyer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tamsin Thomas; James Baker; Debbie Massey; Daniel D'Appio; Christina Aggar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Marina Cervera; Simon Bell; Francesc Muñoz; Himansu S Mishra; Lora E Fleming; James Grellier; Glòria Carrasco-Turigas; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Cristina Vert; Mireia Gascon Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Martin Mau; Maria L Vang; Anna Mejldal; Simon Høegmark; Kirsten K Roessler Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 3.390