Nicole Nesvacil1, Maximilian P Schmid2, Richard Pötter3, Gernot Kronreif4, Christian Kirisits3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: nicole.nesvacil@meduniwien.ac.at. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. 4. Austrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wr. Neustadt, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of a treatment planning workflow for three-dimensional image-guided cervix cancer brachytherapy, combining volumetric transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for target definition with CT for dose optimization to organs at risk (OARs), for settings with no access to MRI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A workflow for TRUS/CT-based volumetric treatment planning was developed, based on a customized system including ultrasound probe, stepper unit, and software for image volume acquisition. A full TRUS/CT-based workflow was simulated in a clinical case and compared with MR- or CT-only delineation. High-risk clinical target volume was delineated on TRUS, and OARs were delineated on CT. Manually defined tandem/ring applicator positions on TRUS and CT were used as a reference for rigid registration of the image volumes. Treatment plan optimization for TRUS target and CT organ volumes was performed and compared to MRI and CT target contours. RESULTS: TRUS/CT-based contouring, applicator reconstruction, image fusion, and treatment planning were feasible, and the full workflow could be successfully demonstrated. The TRUS/CT plan fulfilled all clinical planning aims. Dose-volume histogram evaluation of the TRUS/CT-optimized plan (high-risk clinical target volume D90, OARs D2cm³ for) on different image modalities showed good agreement between dose values reported for TRUS/CT and MRI-only reference contours and large deviations for CT-only target parameters. CONCLUSIONS: A TRUS/CT-based workflow for full three-dimensional image-guided cervix brachytherapy treatment planning seems feasible and may be clinically comparable to MRI-based treatment planning. Further development to solve challenges with applicator definition in the TRUS volume is required before systematic applicability of this workflow. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of a treatment planning workflow for three-dimensional image-guided cervix cancer brachytherapy, combining volumetric transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for target definition with CT for dose optimization to organs at risk (OARs), for settings with no access to MRI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A workflow for TRUS/CT-based volumetric treatment planning was developed, based on a customized system including ultrasound probe, stepper unit, and software for image volume acquisition. A full TRUS/CT-based workflow was simulated in a clinical case and compared with MR- or CT-only delineation. High-risk clinical target volume was delineated on TRUS, and OARs were delineated on CT. Manually defined tandem/ring applicator positions on TRUS and CT were used as a reference for rigid registration of the image volumes. Treatment plan optimization for TRUS target and CT organ volumes was performed and compared to MRI and CT target contours. RESULTS: TRUS/CT-based contouring, applicator reconstruction, image fusion, and treatment planning were feasible, and the full workflow could be successfully demonstrated. The TRUS/CT plan fulfilled all clinical planning aims. Dose-volume histogram evaluation of the TRUS/CT-optimized plan (high-risk clinical target volume D90, OARs D2cm³ for) on different image modalities showed good agreement between dose values reported for TRUS/CT and MRI-only reference contours and large deviations for CT-only target parameters. CONCLUSIONS: A TRUS/CT-based workflow for full three-dimensional image-guided cervix brachytherapy treatment planning seems feasible and may be clinically comparable to MRI-based treatment planning. Further development to solve challenges with applicator definition in the TRUS volume is required before systematic applicability of this workflow. Copyright Â
Authors: José Richart; Vicente Carmona-Meseguer; Teresa García-Martínez; Antonio Herreros; Antonio Otal; Santiago Pellejero; Ana Tornero-López; José Pérez-Calatayud Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2018-07-23
Authors: Richard Pötter; Kari Tanderup; Christian Kirisits; Astrid de Leeuw; Kathrin Kirchheiner; Remi Nout; Li Tee Tan; Christine Haie-Meder; Umesh Mahantshetty; Barbara Segedin; Peter Hoskin; Kjersti Bruheim; Bhavana Rai; Fleur Huang; Erik Van Limbergen; Max Schmid; Nicole Nesvacil; Alina Sturdza; Lars Fokdal; Nina Boje Kibsgaard Jensen; Dietmar Georg; Marianne Assenholt; Yvette Seppenwoolde; Christel Nomden; Israel Fortin; Supriya Chopra; Uulke van der Heide; Tamara Rumpold; Jacob Christian Lindegaard; Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-01-11
Authors: Stéphanie Smet; Nicole Nesvacil; Johannes Knoth; Alina Sturdza; Dina Najjari-Jamal; Filip Jelinek; Gernot Kronreif; Richard Pötter; Joachim Widder; Christian Kirisits; Maximilian P Schmid Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Xiao-Jing Yan; Yi Yang; Xi Chen; Shi-Guang Wang; Shu-Huai Niu; Hui-Xian Niu; Hong Liu Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Mario Federico; Carmen Rosa Hernandez-Socorro; Ivone Ribeiro; Jesus Gonzalez Martin; Maria Dolores Rey-Baltar Oramas; Marta Lloret Saez-Bravo; Pedro Carlos Lara Jimenez Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 3.481