| Literature DB >> 34156579 |
Wei-Kang Wang1, Yan-Lu Wang1, Wen-Juan Li1, Qi-Chao Wu1, Kai-Lun Yang2, Sheng-Li Li1, Hong-Jian Yang3.
Abstract
Regarding whole cottonseed (WCS), cottonseed meal (CSM), and cottonseed hull (CSH), in situ rumen incubation was applied to determine their nutrient and gossypol degradation characteristics and bacterial colonization profile in lactating Holstein cows. Nylon bags containing the cotton by-products were incubated for 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h in the rumen, respectively. The relationship between nutrient degradability and free gossypol (FG) content were examined, and the differences in the composition and inferred gene function of the colonized microbiota were studied. As a result, CSM presented highest effective degradability of dry matter, neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre, but the highest effective degradability of crude protein was found in WCS. Free gossypol disappearance rate increased significantly in the first 6 h, and it reached approximately 94% at 72 h of incubation among all samples. The level of FG did not affect nutrient degradability of cotton by-products. Significant differences were noted in attached bacterial community structure among cotton by-products after 24 h rumen incubation. Among the most abundant taxa at genus level, a greater abundance of Cercis gigantea and Succiniclasticum was observed in WCS samples, whereas the CSH and CSM samples contained a greater proportion of Prevotella 1 and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group. The redundancy analysis revealed that the level of neutral detergent fibre, ether extract, and FG in cotton by-products were significantly positive related with the composition of the attached bacteria. Collectively, our results revealed the dynamics of degradation characteristics, and the difference in the composition of bacterial colonization. These findings are of importance for the targeted improvement of cotton by-products nutrient use efficiency in ruminants and further understanding of the gossypol degradation mechanism in the rumen.Entities:
Keywords: Attached bacteria; Cotton by-products; Gossypol; In situ degradation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34156579 PMCID: PMC8218095 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-021-01244-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
The α diversity of bacterial community attached to cotton by-products after an incubation of 24 h
| Itema | OTUb numbers | Chao 1 values | Shannon index |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSH | 1045d | 1233d | 7.5d |
| CSM | 1059d | 1251d | 7.7d |
| WCS | 792e | 1033e | 6.3e |
| SEMc | 18.15 | 22.87 | 0.20 |
| < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
aCSH, cottonseed hull, including 2 samples; CSM, cottonseed meal, including 3 samples; WCS, whole cottonseed, including 3 samples; each kind of sample was incubated in 3 cows simultaneously
bOTU, operational taxonomic units
cSEM, standard error of the difference of the means, n = 3
d,eValues in a column within the same class without a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05)
Pearson correlation coefficients among α diversity of attached bacteria of 24 h and nutritional composition
| Item | CP | NDF | ADF | EE | FG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU numbers | 0.30 | − 0.15 | − 0.12 | − 0.91** | − 0.85** |
| Chao 1 values | 0.30 | − 0.16 | − 0.12 | − 0.89 | − 0.85** |
| Shannon index | 0.28 | − 0.16 | − 0.14 | − 0.69 | − 0.63** |
ADF acid detergent fiber, CP crude protein, EE ether extract, FG free gossypol, NDF neutral detergent fiber, OTU operational taxonomic units
**P < 0.01
Fig. 1Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of microbial diversity across all samples using a unweighted UniFrac metric. The percentage of variation explained by PC1 and PC2 are indicated in the axis. CSH, cottonseed hull; CSM, cottonseed meal; WCS, whole cottonseed
Percentage contribution of sequences (%) evaluated at the phyla and genus level across three-kinds of incubated cotton by-products samples of 24 h
| Item | CSH | CSM | WCS | SEMa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phyla | |||||
| 54.8b | 58.0b | 32.6c | 2.12 | < 0.01 | |
| 23.0c | 26.5c | 38.4b | 2.94 | 0.03 | |
| 12.4b | 2.9c | 7.2b,c | 1.40 | 0.02 | |
| 0.8c | 0.1c | 14.0b | 0.78 | < 0.01 | |
| 2.3c | 5.9b | 1.5c | 0.45 | < 0.01 | |
| 3.2 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.83 | 0.38 | |
| 1.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 0.53 | 0.55 | |
| 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.15 | 0.20 | |
| 0.7b | 0.6b | 0.3c | 0.06 | 0.02 | |
| Unidentified | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.09 | 0.39 |
| 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.13 | 0.34 | |
| 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.14 | 0.55 | |
| Other | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.25 |
| Genus | |||||
| 1.2b | 1.6b | 0.4c | 0.07 | < 0.01 | |
| 1.2b | 1.5b | 0.4c | 0.18 | 0.02 | |
| 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.36 | 0.09 | |
| 2.0 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.70 | 0.33 | |
| 1.7b | 0.6c | 0.7c | 0.13 | < 0.01 | |
| 1.2b | 0.2c | 1.0b | 0.14 | 0.01 | |
| 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.30 | 0.30 | |
| 2.7b | 0.8c | 2.4b | 0.21 | < 0.01 | |
| 3.6c | 6.5b | 0.9d | 0.52 | < 0.01 | |
| 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.70 | 0.33 | |
| 5.4b | 0.4c | 1.0b,c | 1.11 | 0.07 | |
| 2.3b,c | 1.0c | 3.8b | 0.54 | 0.03 | |
| 0.3c | 0.7c | 2.6b | 0.47 | 0.04 | |
| 0.7 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 0.89 | 0.28 | |
| 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 0.82 | 0.35 | |
| 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.63 | 0.31 | |
| 0.7c | 0.1c | 14.0b | 0.79 | < 0.01 | |
| 2.1c | 1.4c | 9.3b | 1.54 | 0.02 | |
| Unidentified | 23.3c | 35.9b | 22.3c | 1.40 | < 0.01 |
| 29.6b | 18.9c | 13.7c | 1.81 | < 0.01 | |
| Other | 15.9 | 18.5 | 14.5 | 1.09 | 0.12 |
CSH cottonseed hull, including 2 samples, CSM cottonseed meal, including 3 samples, WCS whole cottonseed, including 3 samples; each kind of sample was incubated in 3 cows simultaneously
aSEM standard error of the difference of the means, n = 3
b,c,dValues in a row within the same class without a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Biplot of the redundancy analysis (RDA) based on the relative abundance of dominant genera (> 1% of total sequence). Constrained explanatory variables are indicated by open triangle arrows. CSH cottonseed hull, CSM cottonseed meal, WCS whole cottonseed, 1–3 sample number of each kind of cotton by-products
Fig. 3Correlation analysis of chemical composition and rumen effective degradability of cotton by-products. a correlation analysis of NDF content and ED of DM, b correlation analysis of ADF content and ED of DM, c correlation analysis of CP content and ED of DM, d correlation analysis of CP content and ED of NDF, e correlation analysis of CP content and ED of ADF
Pearson correlation coefficient of FG content and ED of nutrients
| Item | ED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | CP | NDF | ADF | |
| FG | 0.07 | 0.53 | − 0.41 | − 0.23 |
ADF acid detergent fiber, CP crude protein, DM dry matter, ED effective degradability, FG free gossypol, NDF neutral detergent fiber