Daniel W Spaite1, Chengcheng Hu2, Bentley J Bobrow3, Vatsal Chikani4, Bruce Barnhart5, Joshua B Gaither6, Kurt R Denninghoff6, P David Adelson7, Samuel M Keim6, Chad Viscusi6, Terry Mullins8, Duane Sherrill9. 1. Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. Electronic address: dan@aemrc.arizona.edu. 2. Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; College of Public Health, the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. 3. Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS and Trauma System, Phoenix, AZ. 4. Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS and Trauma System, Phoenix, AZ. 5. Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ. 6. Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. 7. Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital and Department of Child Health/Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, the University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ. 8. Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS and Trauma System, Phoenix, AZ. 9. College of Public Health, the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Survival is significantly reduced by either hypotension or hypoxia during the out-of-hospital management of major traumatic brain injury. However, only a handful of small studies have investigated the influence of the combination of both hypotension and hypoxia occurring together. In patients with major traumatic brain injury, we evaluate the associations between mortality and out-of-hospital hypotension and hypoxia separately and in combination. METHODS: All moderate or severe traumatic brain injury cases in the preimplementation cohort of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study (a statewide, before/after, controlled study of the effect of implementing the out-of-hospital traumatic brain injury treatment guidelines) from January 1, 2007, to March 31, 2014, were evaluated (exclusions: <10 years, out-of-hospital oxygen saturation ≤10%, and out-of-hospital systolic blood pressure <40 or >200 mm Hg). The relationship between mortality and hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) or hypoxia (saturation <90%) was assessed with multivariable logistic regression, controlling for Injury Severity Score, head region severity, injury type (blunt versus penetrating), age, sex, race, ethnicity, payer, interhospital transfer, and trauma center. RESULTS: Among the 13,151 patients who met inclusion criteria (median age 45 years; 68.6% men), 11,545 (87.8%) had neither hypotension nor hypoxia, 604 (4.6%) had hypotension only, 790 (6.0%) had hypoxia only, and 212 (1.6%) had both hypotension and hypoxia. Mortality for the 4 study cohorts was 5.6%, 20.7%, 28.1%, and 43.9%, respectively. The crude and adjusted odds ratios for death within the cohorts, using the patients with neither hypotension nor hypoxia as the reference, were 4.4 and 2.5, 6.6 and 3.0, and 13.2 and 6.1, respectively. Evaluation for an interaction between hypotension and hypoxia revealed that the effects were additive on the log odds of death. CONCLUSION: In this statewide analysis of major traumatic brain injury, combined out-of-hospital hypotension and hypoxia were associated with significantly increased mortality. This effect on survival persisted even after controlling for multiple potential confounders. In fact, the adjusted odds of death for patients with both hypotension and hypoxia were more than 2 times greater than for those with either hypotension or hypoxia alone. These findings seem supportive of the emphasis on aggressive prevention and treatment of hypotension and hypoxia reflected in the current emergency medical services traumatic brain injury treatment guidelines but clearly reveal the need for further study to determine their influence on outcome.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Survival is significantly reduced by either hypotension or hypoxia during the out-of-hospital management of major traumatic brain injury. However, only a handful of small studies have investigated the influence of the combination of both hypotension and hypoxia occurring together. In patients with major traumatic brain injury, we evaluate the associations between mortality and out-of-hospital hypotension and hypoxia separately and in combination. METHODS: All moderate or severe traumatic brain injury cases in the preimplementation cohort of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study (a statewide, before/after, controlled study of the effect of implementing the out-of-hospital traumatic brain injury treatment guidelines) from January 1, 2007, to March 31, 2014, were evaluated (exclusions: <10 years, out-of-hospital oxygen saturation ≤10%, and out-of-hospital systolic blood pressure <40 or >200 mm Hg). The relationship between mortality and hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) or hypoxia (saturation <90%) was assessed with multivariable logistic regression, controlling for Injury Severity Score, head region severity, injury type (blunt versus penetrating), age, sex, race, ethnicity, payer, interhospital transfer, and trauma center. RESULTS: Among the 13,151 patients who met inclusion criteria (median age 45 years; 68.6% men), 11,545 (87.8%) had neither hypotension nor hypoxia, 604 (4.6%) had hypotension only, 790 (6.0%) had hypoxia only, and 212 (1.6%) had both hypotension and hypoxia. Mortality for the 4 study cohorts was 5.6%, 20.7%, 28.1%, and 43.9%, respectively. The crude and adjusted odds ratios for death within the cohorts, using the patients with neither hypotension nor hypoxia as the reference, were 4.4 and 2.5, 6.6 and 3.0, and 13.2 and 6.1, respectively. Evaluation for an interaction between hypotension and hypoxia revealed that the effects were additive on the log odds of death. CONCLUSION: In this statewide analysis of major traumatic brain injury, combined out-of-hospital hypotension and hypoxia were associated with significantly increased mortality. This effect on survival persisted even after controlling for multiple potential confounders. In fact, the adjusted odds of death for patients with both hypotension and hypoxia were more than 2 times greater than for those with either hypotension or hypoxia alone. These findings seem supportive of the emphasis on aggressive prevention and treatment of hypotension and hypoxia reflected in the current emergency medical services traumatic brain injury treatment guidelines but clearly reveal the need for further study to determine their influence on outcome.
Authors: Patrick M Kochanek; Nancy Carney; P David Adelson; Stephen Ashwal; Michael J Bell; Susan Bratton; Susan Carson; Randall M Chesnut; Jamshid Ghajar; Brahm Goldstein; Gerald A Grant; Niranjan Kissoon; Kimberly Peterson; Nathan R Selden; Robert C Tasker; Karen A Tong; Monica S Vavilala; Mark S Wainwright; Craig R Warden Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: H S Levin; E F Aldrich; C Saydjari; H M Eisenberg; M A Foulkes; M Bellefleur; T G Luerssen; J A Jane; A Marmarou; L F Marshall Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Daniel W Spaite; Chengcheng Hu; Bentley J Bobrow; Vatsal Chikani; Bruce Barnhart; Joshua B Gaither; Kurt R Denninghoff; P David Adelson; Samuel M Keim; Chad Viscusi; Terry Mullins; Amber D Rice; Duane Sherrill Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Joshua B Gaither; Vatsal Chikani; Uwe Stolz; Chad Viscusi; Kurt Denninghoff; Bruce Barnhart; Terry Mullins; Amber D Rice; Moses Mhayamaguru; Jennifer J Smith; Samuel M Keim; Bentley J Bobrow; Daniel W Spaite Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Fabio A Vigil; Eda Bozdemir; Vladislav Bugay; Sang H Chun; MaryAnn Hobbs; Isamar Sanchez; Shayne D Hastings; Rafael J Veraza; Deborah M Holstein; Shane M Sprague; Chase M Carver; Jose E Cavazos; Robert Brenner; James D Lechleiter; Mark S Shapiro Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Daniel W Spaite; Bentley J Bobrow; Samuel M Keim; Bruce Barnhart; Vatsal Chikani; Joshua B Gaither; Duane Sherrill; Kurt R Denninghoff; Terry Mullins; P David Adelson; Amber D Rice; Chad Viscusi; Chengcheng Hu Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Joshua B Gaither; Daniel W Spaite; Bentley J Bobrow; Samuel M Keim; Bruce J Barnhart; Vatsal Chikani; Duane Sherrill; Kurt R Denninghoff; Terry Mullins; P David Adelson; Amber D Rice; Chad Viscusi; Chengcheng Hu Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Halinder S Mangat; Xian Wu; Linda M Gerber; Hamisi K Shabani; Albert Lazaro; Andreas Leidinger; Maria M Santos; Paul H McClelland; Hanna Schenck; Pascal Joackim; Japhet G Ngerageza; Franziska Schmidt; Philip E Stieg; Roger Hartl Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 5.408
Authors: Rebecka Rubenson Wahlin; David W Nelson; Bo-Michael Bellander; Mikael Svensson; Adel Helmy; Eric Peter Thelin Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 4.003