Yibo Li1, Jenelle L Pederson1, Thomas A Churchill1, Adrian S Wagg1, Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc1, Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan1, Raj S Padwal1, Rachel G Khadaroo2. 1. Departments of Surgery (Li, Pederson, Churchill, Khadaroo), Medicine (Wagg, Alagiakrishnan, Padwal) and Critical Care Medicine (Khadaroo), University of Alberta; Alberta Seniors Health Strategic Clinical Network (Wagg, Alagiakrishnan), Alberta; Departments of Medicine (Holroyd-Leduc) and Community Health Sciences (Holroyd-Leduc), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Alberta Diabetes Institute (Padwal), Edmonton, Alta. 2. Departments of Surgery (Li, Pederson, Churchill, Khadaroo), Medicine (Wagg, Alagiakrishnan, Padwal) and Critical Care Medicine (Khadaroo), University of Alberta; Alberta Seniors Health Strategic Clinical Network (Wagg, Alagiakrishnan), Alberta; Departments of Medicine (Holroyd-Leduc) and Community Health Sciences (Holroyd-Leduc), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Alberta Diabetes Institute (Padwal), Edmonton, Alta. khadaroo@ualberta.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to diverse stressors. We assessed the impact of frailty on outcomes after discharge in older surgical patients. METHODS: We prospectively followed patients 65 years of age or older who underwent emergency abdominal surgery at either of 2 tertiary care centres and who needed assistance with fewer than 3 activities of daily living. Preadmission frailty was defined according to the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale as "well" (score 1 or 2), "vulnerable" (score 3 or 4) or "frail" (score 5 or 6). We assessed composite end points of 30-day and 6-month all-cause readmission or death by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 308 patients (median age 75 [range 65-94] yr, median Clinical Frailty Score 3 [range 1-6]), 168 (54.5%) were classified as vulnerable and 68 (22.1%) as frail. Ten (4.2%) of those classified as vulnerable or frail received a geriatric consultation. At 30 days after discharge, the proportions of patients who were readmitted or had died were greater among vulnerable patients (n = 27 [16.1%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-16.45) and frail patients (n = 12 [17.6%]; adjusted OR 4.51, 95% CI 1.13-17.94) than among patients who were well (n = 3 [4.2%]). By 6 months, the degree of frailty independently and dose-dependently predicted readmission or death: 56 (33.3%) of the vulnerable patients (adjusted OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.01-4.55) and 37 (54.4%) of the frail patients (adjusted OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.32-8.12) were readmitted or had died, compared with 11 (15.3%) of the patients who were well. INTERPRETATION: Vulnerability and frailty were prevalent in older patients undergoing surgery and unlikely to trigger specialized geriatric assessment, yet remained independently associated with greater risk of readmission for as long as 6 months after discharge. Therefore, the degree of frailty has important prognostic value for readmission. TRIAL REGISTRATION FOR PRIMARY STUDY: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02233153.
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to diverse stressors. We assessed the impact of frailty on outcomes after discharge in older surgical patients. METHODS: We prospectively followed patients 65 years of age or older who underwent emergency abdominal surgery at either of 2 tertiary care centres and who needed assistance with fewer than 3 activities of daily living. Preadmission frailty was defined according to the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale as "well" (score 1 or 2), "vulnerable" (score 3 or 4) or "frail" (score 5 or 6). We assessed composite end points of 30-day and 6-month all-cause readmission or death by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 308 patients (median age 75 [range 65-94] yr, median Clinical Frailty Score 3 [range 1-6]), 168 (54.5%) were classified as vulnerable and 68 (22.1%) as frail. Ten (4.2%) of those classified as vulnerable or frail received a geriatric consultation. At 30 days after discharge, the proportions of patients who were readmitted or had died were greater among vulnerable patients (n = 27 [16.1%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-16.45) and frail patients (n = 12 [17.6%]; adjusted OR 4.51, 95% CI 1.13-17.94) than among patients who were well (n = 3 [4.2%]). By 6 months, the degree of frailty independently and dose-dependently predicted readmission or death: 56 (33.3%) of the vulnerable patients (adjusted OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.01-4.55) and 37 (54.4%) of the frail patients (adjusted OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.32-8.12) were readmitted or had died, compared with 11 (15.3%) of the patients who were well. INTERPRETATION: Vulnerability and frailty were prevalent in older patients undergoing surgery and unlikely to trigger specialized geriatric assessment, yet remained independently associated with greater risk of readmission for as long as 6 months after discharge. Therefore, the degree of frailty has important prognostic value for readmission. TRIAL REGISTRATION FOR PRIMARY STUDY: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02233153.
Authors: Wijnanda J Frenkel; Erika J Jongerius; Miranda J Mandjes-van Uitert; Barbara C van Munster; Sophia E de Rooij Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sara Belga; Sumit R Majumdar; Sharry Kahlon; Jenelle Pederson; Darren Lau; Raj S Padwal; Mary Forhan; Jeffrey A Bakal; Finlay A McAlister Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Dae Hyun Kim; Caroline A Kim; Sebastian Placide; Lewis A Lipsitz; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Katharina Anic; Friedrich Flohr; Mona Wanda Schmidt; Slavomir Krajnak; Roxana Schwab; Marcus Schmidt; Christiane Westphalen; Clemens Eichelsbacher; Christian Ruckes; Walburgis Brenner; Annette Hasenburg; Marco Johannes Battista Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Robert D Becher; Terrence E Murphy; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Linda Leo-Summers; Hans F Stabenau; Thomas M Gill Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Vanessa P Ho; Wyatt P Bensken; Heena P Santry; Christopher W Towe; David F Warner; Alfred F Connors; Siran M Koroukian Journal: Surgery Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 4.348
Authors: Rachel G Khadaroo; Lindsey M Warkentin; Adrian S Wagg; Raj S Padwal; Fiona Clement; Xiaoming Wang; William D Buie; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 14.766