Literature DB >> 27688393

In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluations of Repeatability and Accuracy of VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade-Matching Device.

Dubravka Knezović1, Davor Zlatarić1, Iva Ž Illeš1, Maja Alajbeg1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the intra-device repeatability and accuracy of dental shade-matching device (VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0) using both in vitro and in vivo models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the repeatability assessment, the in vivo model utilized shade-matching device to measure the central region of the labial surface of right maxillary central incisors of 10 people twice. The following tooth colors were measured: B1, A1, A2, A3, C1 and C3. The in vitro model included the same six Vitapan Classical tabs. Two measurements were made of the central region of each shade tab. For the accuracy assessment, each shade tab from 3 Vitapan Classical shade guides was measured once. CIE L*a*b* values were determined. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to analyze the in vitro and in vivo intra-device repeatability of the shade-matching device. The difference between in vitro and in vivo models was analyzed. Accuracy of the device tested was calculated.
RESULTS: The mean color differences for in vivo and in vitro models were 3.51 and 1.25 E units, respectively. The device repeatability ICCs for in vivo measurements ranged from 0.858 to 0.971 and for in vitro from 0.992 to 0.994. Accuracy of the device tested was 93.75%.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the experiment, VITA Easyshade®Advance 4.0 dental shade-matching device enabled reliable and accurate measurement. It can be a valuable tool for the determination of tooth colours.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Color, Luminescent Measurements; Optical Devices; Tooth

Year:  2015        PMID: 27688393      PMCID: PMC4988825          DOI: 10.15644/asc49/2/4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat        ISSN: 0001-7019


  27 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo evaluations of three computer-aided shade matching instruments.

Authors:  Kun Yuan; Xiang Sun; Fu Wang; Hui Wang; Ji-hua Chen
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.440

2.  Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices.

Authors:  Alma Dozić; Cornelis J Kleverlaan; Ahmed El-Zohairy; Albert J Feilzer; Ghazal Khashayar
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch.

Authors:  R Duane Douglas; Tad J Steinhauer; Alvin G Wee
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 4.  Color differences: polymerized composite and corresponding Vitapan Classical shade tab.

Authors:  William D Browning; Rosalia Contreras-Bulnes; Martha G Brackett; William W Brackett
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices.

Authors:  Seungyee Kim-Pusateri; Jane D Brewer; Elaine L Davis; Alvin G Wee
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation.

Authors:  Ali Kanawati; Mark W Richards
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

7.  A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.

Authors:  Ahmad Judeh; Ahed Al-Wahadni
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.677

8.  Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers.

Authors:  I E Ruyter; K Nilner; B Moller
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Color matching in dentistry. I. The three-dimensional nature of color.

Authors:  R C Sproull
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 10.  Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies.

Authors:  James Fondriest
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Influence of Light Conditions and Light Sources on Clinical Measurement of Natural Teeth Color using VITA Easyshade Advance 4,0® Spectrophotometer. Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ivona Posavec; Vladimir Prpić; Dubravka Knezović Zlatarić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2016-12

2.  Assessment of Color Parameters on Maxillary Right Central Incisors Using Spectrophotometer and RAW Mobile Photos in Different Light Conditions.

Authors:  Mirko Soldo; Dvor Illeš; Robert Ćelić; Dubravka Knezović Zlatrić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2020-12

3.  Patients' Assessments of Tooth Sensitivity Increase One Day Following Different Whitening Treatments.

Authors:  Amar Piknjač; Mirko Soldo; Davor Illeš; Dubravka Knezović Zlatarić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2021-09

4.  Visual and instrumental coverage error of two dental shade guides: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Javier Ruiz-López; Maria M Perez; Cristina Lucena; Rosa Pulgar; Ana López-Toruño; Maria Tejada-Casado; Razvan Ghinea
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  Evaluation of the repeatability and matching accuracy between two identical intraoral spectrophotometers: an in vivo and in vitro study.

Authors:  Hee-Kyung Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 1.904

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.