Literature DB >> 17499089

Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch.

R Duane Douglas1, Tad J Steinhauer, Alvin G Wee.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios.
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (DeltaE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 DeltaE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 DeltaE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits.
RESULTS: The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 DeltaE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 DeltaE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap.
CONCLUSIONS: Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17499089     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  63 in total

1.  Color changes of autopolymerized silicone or acrylic soft denture reliners: the effect of accelerated aging.

Authors:  Gregory Polyzois; Ioannis Kostoulas; Dimitra Nikolovieni; Anastasios Mitsoudis; Maria Frangou
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  The color change in artificial white spot lesions measured using a spectroradiometer.

Authors:  Younju Kim; Ho-Hyun Son; Keewook Yi; Hae-Young Kim; Jinsoo Ahn; Juhea Chang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of the Easyshade Compact and Advance in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Andreas Zenthöfer; Tomas Cabrera; Nicoleta Corcodel; Peter Rammelsberg; Alexander J Hassel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Could digital imaging be an alternative for digital colorimeters?

Authors:  Alper Caglar; Kivanc Yamanel; Kamran Gulsahi; Bora Bagis; Mutlu Ozcan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Color stability of adhesive resin cements after immersion in coffee.

Authors:  Maho Shiozawa; Hidekazu Takahashi; Yuya Asakawa; Naohiko Iwasaki
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Color stability of denture teeth and acrylic base resin subjected daily to various consumer cleansers.

Authors:  Audrey Moon; John M Powers; Sudarat Kiat-Amnuay
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.843

7.  The effect of ceramic thickness and resin cement shades on the color matching of ceramic veneers in discolored teeth.

Authors:  Wenzhong Xing; Xiaodong Chen; Dafei Ren; Kangru Zhan; Yining Wang
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  In vivo study for tooth colour determination-visual versus digital.

Authors:  Jan Brandt; Shirley Nelson; Hans-Christoph Lauer; Ulrike von Hehn; Silvia Brandt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Color changes in staining solutions of four light-cured indirect resin composites.

Authors:  Christina Kentrou; Triantafillos Papadopoulos; Panagiotis Lagouvardos
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.634

10.  Estimating the color of maxillary central incisors based on age and gender.

Authors:  David Gozalo-Diaz; William M Johnston; Alvin G Wee
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.