Literature DB >> 27687923

Diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone electrocardiograph in dogs: Comparison with standard 6-lead electrocardiography.

T Vezzosi1, C Buralli2, F Marchesotti3, F Porporato3, R Tognetti2, E Zini4, O Domenech3.   

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone electrocardiograph (ECG) in evaluating heart rhythm and ECG measurements was evaluated in 166 dogs. A standard 6-lead ECG was acquired for 1 min in each dog. A smartphone ECG tracing was simultaneously recorded using a single-lead bipolar ECG recorder. All ECGs were reviewed by one blinded operator, who judged if tracings were acceptable for interpretation and assigned an electrocardiographic diagnosis. Agreement between smartphone and standard ECG in the interpretation of tracings was evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of arrhythmia were calculated for the smartphone ECG. Smartphone ECG tracings were interpretable in 162/166 (97.6%) tracings. A perfect agreement between the smartphone and standard ECG was found in detecting bradycardia, tachycardia, ectopic beats and atrioventricular blocks. A very good agreement was found in detecting sinus rhythm versus non-sinus rhythm (100% sensitivity and 97.9% specificity). The smartphone ECG provided tracings that were adequate for analysis in most dogs, with an accurate assessment of heart rate, rhythm and common arrhythmias. The smartphone ECG represents an additional tool in the diagnosis of arrhythmias in dogs, but is not a substitute for a 6-lead ECG. Arrhythmias identified by the smartphone ECG should be followed up with a standard ECG before making clinical decisions.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canine; Electrocardiography; Smartphone; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27687923     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  8 in total

1.  Comparison between smartphone electrocardiography and standard three-lead base apex electrocardiography in healthy horses.

Authors:  Brittany Welch-Huston; Sian Durward-Akhurst; Elaine Norton; Lacey Ellingson; Aaron Rendahl; Molly McCue
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Stall-side screening potential of a smartphone electrocardiogram recorded over both sides of the thorax in horses.

Authors:  Ignacio Corradini; Alicia Fernández-Ruiz; Marta Barba; Javier Engel-Manchado
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Evaluation of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device accuracy in field and in hospital conditions in horses.

Authors:  Elena Alberti; Luca Stucchi; Valeria Pesce; Giovanni Stancari; Elisabetta Ferro; Francesco Ferrucci; Enrica Zucca
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2020-12-21

4.  Evaluation of a new portable 1-lead digital cardiac monitor (eKuore) compared with standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy horses.

Authors:  Valentina Vitale; Tommaso Vezzosi; Rosalba Tognetti; Carlotta Fraschetti; Micaela Sgorbini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prospective pre- and post-race evaluation of biochemical, electrophysiologic, and echocardiographic indices in 30 racing thoroughbred horses that received furosemide.

Authors:  Catherine T Gunther-Harrington; Rick Arthur; Krista Estell; Beatriz Martinez Lopez; Alexandra Sinnott; Eric Ontiveros; Anita Varga; Joshua A Stern
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Recording Heart Rate Variability of Dairy Cows to the Cloud-Why Smartphones Provide Smart Solutions.

Authors:  Maren Wierig; Leonard P Mandtler; Peter Rottmann; Viktor Stroh; Ute Müller; Wolfgang Büscher; Lutz Plümer
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Effects of Cold Stimulation on Cardiac-Vagal Activation in Healthy Participants: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Manuela Jungmann; Shervin Vencatachellum; Dimitri Van Ryckeghem; Claus Vögele
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2018-10-09

8.  Comparison of smartphone-based and standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy dairy cows.

Authors:  Francesca Bonelli; Tommaso Vezzosi; Mireille Meylan; Irene Nocera; Vincenzo Ferrulli; Carlotta Buralli; Valentina Meucci; Rosalba Tognetti
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.333

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.