| Literature DB >> 27686416 |
Toni Roiha1,2, Sari Peura1,3, Mathieu Cusson2, Milla Rautio1,2,4,5.
Abstract
In the subarctic region, climate warming and permafrost thaw are leading to emergence of ponds and to an increase in mobility of catchment carbon. As carbon of terrestrial origin is increasing in subarctic freshwaters the resource pool supporting their microbial communities and metabolism is changing, with consequences to overall aquatic productivity. By sampling different subarctic water bodies for a one complete year we show how terrestrial and algal carbon compounds vary in a range of freshwaters and how differential organic carbon quality is linked to bacterial metabolism and community composition. We show that terrestrial drainage and associated nutrients supported higher bacterial growth in ponds and river mouths that were influenced by fresh terrestrial carbon than in large lakes with carbon from algal production. Bacterial diversity, however, was lower at sites influenced by terrestrial carbon inputs. Bacterial community composition was highly variable among different water bodies and especially influenced by concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), fulvic acids, proteins and nutrients. Furthermore, a distinct preference was found for terrestrial vs. algal carbon among certain bacterial tribes. The results highlight the contribution of the numerous ponds to cycling of terrestrial carbon in the changing subarctic and arctic regions.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27686416 PMCID: PMC5043279 DOI: 10.1038/srep34456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Mean values of temperature, total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), chlorophyll-a (chl-a), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), specific UV-absorbance index (SUVA254), absorption at 320 nm (a320), spectral slope at 289 nm (S289) and fluorescence intensity of humic, fulvic and protein compounds of DOC in Raman units (R.U) for the three different water pools.
| Site | Season | Temp (°C) | TP (μg L-1) | TN (μg L-1) | Chl-a (μg L-1) | DOC (mg L-1) | a320 | SUVA254 (mgC L-1 m-1) | S289 | Humic (R.U.) | Fulvic (R.U.) | Protein (R.U.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pond | W | 0.1 | 8.0 | 350 | 0.51 | 3.9 | 19.8 | 3.8 | 0.0099 | 0.7031 | 0.0075 | 0.7342 |
| Inlet | W | 0.1 | 6.0 | 174 | 0.11 | 2.8 | 6.6 | 2.6 | 0.0173 | 0.6848 | 0.0562 | 0.2815 |
| Outlet | W | 0.3 | 5.3 | 132 | 0.09 | 2.3 | 4.7 | 2.4 | 0.0190 | 0.4871 | 0.0538 | 0.3247 |
| Pond | S | 0.1 | 10.0 | 381 | 0.22 | 4.6 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 0.0132 | 0.9431 | 0.0872 | 0.6349 |
| Inlet | S | 0.4 | 6.6 | 218 | 0.16 | 2.6 | 6.5 | 2.6 | 0.0156 | 0.6465 | 0.0660 | 0.3547 |
| Outlet | S | 0.5 | 5.7 | 198 | 0.19 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 2.4 | 0.0197 | 0.4904 | 0.0531 | 0.3384 |
| Pond | I | 12.0 | 6.7 | 144 | 0.18 | 2.8 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 0.0152 | 0.7339 | 0.1115 | 0.3966 |
| Inlet | I | 10.2 | 5.7 | 116 | 0.29 | 2.5 | 7.7 | 3.2 | 0.0151 | 0.8036 | 0.0344 | 0.2771 |
| Outlet | I | 6.3 | 5.7 | 137 | 0.34 | 2.3 | 5.9 | 2.7 | 0.0173 | 0.5803 | 0.0491 | 0.2783 |
| Pond | Su | 14.4 | 5.7 | 136 | 0.16 | 2.9 | 7.4 | 2.6 | 0.0154 | 0.8631 | 0.0736 | 0.3374 |
| Inlet | Su | 13.6 | 5.3 | 145 | 0.20 | 2.6 | 6.7 | 2.7 | 0.0155 | 0.7303 | 0.0339 | 0.2924 |
| Outlet | Su | 13.1 | 5.0 | 120 | 0.19 | 2.4 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 0.0185 | 0.4702 | 0.0702 | 0.3134 |
| Pond | F | 0.5 | 6.0 | 136 | 0.25 | 2.5 | 6.9 | 2.7 | 0.0147 | 0.6996 | 0.0354 | 0.2542 |
| Inlet | F | 2.4 | 5.7 | 139 | 0.22 | 2.0 | 5.8 | 3.0 | 0.0155 | 0.6121 | 0.0588 | 0.3253 |
| Outlet | F | 4.9 | 5.0 | 121 | 0.54 | 2.2 | 6.2 | 2.4 | 0.0187 | 0.4333 | 0.0569 | 0.2652 |
| Pond | All | 5.4 a | 7.3 a | 229 a | 0.27 a | 3.2 a | 10.0 a | 2.7 a | 0.0137 a | 0.7886 a | 0.0630 a | 0.4715 a |
| Inlet | All | 5.4 a | 5.9 b | 158 b | 0.18 a | 2.4 ab | 6.7 a | 2.7 a | 0.0158 ab | 0.6955 a | 0.0499 a | 0.3062 b |
| Outlet | All | 5.0 a | 5.3 b | 142 b | 0.27 a | 2.3 b | 5.4 a | 2.4 a | 0.0186 b | 0.2461 a | 0.0566 a | 0.3040 b |
Data are shown for five seasons in 2011: winter (W), spring (S), ice break (I), summer (Su), and fall (F) as well as for the entire year (All). The letters (for All) indicate statistical differences between sites.
Figure 1Mean yearly bacterial metabolism ± SE for ponds, inlets and outlets measured as (a) bacterial production (BP), (b) bacteria respiration (BR) and (c) bacterial growth efficiency (BGE). W = winter, S = spring, I = ice breakup, Su = summer and F = fall. The letters indicate statistical differences among sites.
Shannon and Inverse Simpson indices (±SE) for different sites.
| Site | Inverse Simpson | Pielous Index |
|---|---|---|
| Pond | 6.2 ± 4.2 | 0.45 ± 0.07 |
| Inlet | 16.4 ± 10.0 | 0.47 ± 0.07 |
| Outlet | 18.6 ± 7.9 | 0.49 ± 0.03 |
Figure 2Ternary plot showing the distribution of OTUs between the habitats.
Axes represent the pond, inlet and outlet and the percentage of reads associated with each environment. The size of the symbol indicates number of reads associated with each OTU and taxonomic affiliations are indicated by colors. All OTUs with at least 20 reads were included into the plot.
Results of different multiple linear regression models (based on lowest AICc) to estimate a) bacterial production (BP), b) bacteria respiration (BR) and c) bacteria growth efficiency (BGE) for all data and for ponds, inlets and outlets separately.
| Intercept | Humic | TN | S289 | Chl-a | N | R2 (adj. R2) | AICc | RMSE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a) BP | |||||||||
| | −1.00 | 0.86 | 0.24 | ns | ns | 42 | 0.26 (0.22) | 105.65 | 0.816 |
| Partial R2 | 0.07 | 0.19 | |||||||
| | — | ns | ns | ns | ns | 13 | — | — | — |
| Partial R2 | |||||||||
| | 4.77 | ns | 0.007 | −320.31 | ns | 15 | 0.62 (0.56) | 30.12 | 0.495 |
| Partial R2 | 0.38 | 0.24 | |||||||
| | — | ns | ns | ns | ns | 14 | — | — | — |
| Partial R2 | |||||||||
| b) BR | |||||||||
| | −2.45 | ns | 0.078 | ns | ns | 39 | 0.36 (0.22) | 105.65 | 0.816 |
| Partial R2 | 0.36 | ||||||||
| | −4.80 | ns | 0.12 | ns | −24.77 | 13 | 0.87 (0.84) | 80.23 | 4.47 |
| Partial R2 | 0.66 | 0.21 | |||||||
| | — | ns | ns | ns | ns | 14 | — | — | — |
| Partial R2 | |||||||||
| | −7.16 | ns | 0.11 | ns | ns | 13 | 0.80 (0.79) | 75.67 | 3.46 |
| Partial R2 | 0.80 | ||||||||
| c) BGE | |||||||||
| | 0.63 | ns | −00006 | −22.10 | −0.18 | 39 | 0.26 (0.20) | −52.48 | 0.11 |
| Partial R2 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.08 | ||||||
| | — | ns | ns | ns | ns | 13 | — | — | — |
| Partial R2 | |||||||||
| | — | ns | ns | ns | ns | 14 | — | — | — |
| Partial R2 | |||||||||
| | — | ns | ns | ns | ns | 13 | — | — | — |
| Partial R2 | |||||||||
Humic acids (Humic), total nitrogen (TN), spectral slope at 289 nm (S289) and chlorohyll-a (Chl-a) were the variables used in the regression models (only significant values are listed). ns: not significant. Partial R2 below each regression coefficient, N = number of data included, total R2 (adjusted R2), small sample size–corrected AICc Index and root mean square errors (RMSE) are shown.
Combinations of environmental variables (TP, TN, DOC, Chl-a, S289, SUVA, humic, fulvic and protein), taken k at a time, giving the four best variables alone and the largest rank correlation ρ between OTU and environmental variable similarity matrices; bold indicates the best combination overall.
| k | Best variable combinations ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Protein (0.42) | DOC (0.38) | TN (0.35) | TP (0.34) |
| 3 | TP, fulvic, protein (0.54) | |||
| 4 | TP, humic, fulvic, protein (0.55) | TP, S289, fulvic, protein (0.54) | ||
| 5 | TP, DOC, S289, fulvic, protein (0.56) | TP, DOC, humic, fulvic, protein (0.56) | TP, DOC, SUVA, fulvic, protein (0.55) | TP, S289, humic, fulvic, protein (0.57) |
Figure 3Heatmap visualizing the Spearman correlations between abundances of OTUs and concentrations of different fractions of CDOM.