Literature DB >> 28849425

Contribution of point sources and non-point sources to nutrient and carbon loads and their influence on the trophic status of the Ganga River at Varanasi, India.

Amita Yadav1, Jitendra Pandey2.   

Abstract

To determine the possible contributions of point and non-point sources to n class="Chemical">carbon and nutrient lon class="Disease">ading in the Ganga River, we analyzed N, P, and organic carbon (OC) in the atmospheric deposits, surface runoff, and in the river along a 37-km stretch from 2013 to 2015. We also assessed the trophic status of the river as influenced by such sources of nutrient input. Although the river N, P, and productivity showed a declining trend with increasing discharge, runoff DOC and dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) increased by 88.05 and 122.7% between the Adpr and Rjht sites, indicating contributions from atmospheric deposition (AD) coupled with land use where agriculture appeared to be the major contributor. Point source input led to increased river concentrations of NO3-, NH4+, DRP, and DOC by 10.5, 115.9, 115.2, and 67.3%, respectively. Increases in N, P, and productivity along the gradient were significantly negatively correlated with river discharge (p < 0.001), while river DOC and dissolved silica showed positive relationships. The results revealed large differences in point and non-point sources of carbon and nutrient input into the Ganga River, although these variations were strongly influenced by the seasonality in surface runoff and river discharge. Despite these variations, N and P concentrations were sufficient to enhance phytoplankton growth along the study stretch. Allochthonous input together with enhanced autotrophy would accelerate heterotrophic growth, degrading the river more rapidly in the near future. This study suggests the need for large-scale inter-regional time series data on the point and non-point source partitioning and associated food web dynamics of this major river system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atmospheric deposition; DOC; Ganga River; Point source; Surface runoff; Trophic status

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28849425     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-6188-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  24 in total

1.  River pollution from non-point sources: a new simplified method of assessment.

Authors:  Michele Munafò; Giuliano Cecchi; Fabio Baiocco; Laura Mancini
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Characterization and source apportionment of water pollution in Jinjiang River, China.

Authors:  Haiyang Chen; Yanguo Teng; Weifeng Yue; Liuting Song
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Water Quality Interaction with Alkaline Phosphatase in the Ganga River: Implications for River Health.

Authors:  Amita Yadav; Jitendra Pandey
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Seasonal nutrient dynamics in a chalk stream: the River Frome, Dorset, UK.

Authors:  M J Bowes; D V Leach; W A House
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Assessment of global nitrogen pollution in rivers using an integrated biogeochemical modeling framework.

Authors:  Bin He; Shinjiro Kanae; Taikan Oki; Yukiko Hirabayashi; Yosuke Yamashiki; Kaoru Takara
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Nitrate concentrations in river waters of the upper Thames and its tributaries.

Authors:  Colin Neal; Helen P Jarvie; Margaret Neal; Linda Hill; Heather Wickham
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Modelling of phosphorus inputs to rivers from diffuse and point sources.

Authors:  Michael J Bowes; Jim T Smith; Helen P Jarvie; Colin Neal
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Export of nitrogen from catchments: a worldwide analysis.

Authors:  M Alvarez-Cobelas; D G Angeler; S Sánchez-Carrillo
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Intraspecific Autochthonous and Allochthonous Resource Use by Zooplankton in a Humic Lake during the Transitions between Winter, Summer and Fall.

Authors:  Martin Berggren; Ann-Kristin Bergström; Jan Karlsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Allochthonous carbon is a major regulator to bacterial growth and community composition in subarctic freshwaters.

Authors:  Toni Roiha; Sari Peura; Mathieu Cusson; Milla Rautio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.