Literature DB >> 27686345

Long-term outcomes in patients with septic shock transfused at a lower versus a higher haemoglobin threshold: the TRISS randomised, multicentre clinical trial.

Sofie L Rygård1, Lars B Holst1, Jørn Wetterslev2, Per Winkel2, Pär I Johansson3, Jan Wernerman4, Anne B Guttormsen5, Sari Karlsson6, Anders Perner7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the predefined long-term outcomes in patients randomised in the Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial.
METHODS: In 32 Scandinavian ICUs, we randomised 1005 patients with septic shock and haemoglobin of 9 g/dl or less to receive single units of leuko-reduced red cells when haemoglobin level was 7 g/dl or less (lower threshold) or 9 g/dl or less (higher threshold) during ICU stay. We assessed mortality rates 1 year after randomisation and again in all patients at time of longest follow-up in the intention-to-treat population (n = 998) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 1 year after randomisation in the Danish patients only (n = 777).
RESULTS: Mortality rates in the lower- versus higher-threshold group at 1 year were 53.5 % (268/501 patients) versus 54.6 % (271/496) [relative risk 0.97; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.09; P = 0.62]; at longest follow-up (median 21 months), they were 56.7 % (284/501) versus 61.0 % (302/495) (hazard ratio 0.88; 95 % CI 0.75-1.03; P = 0.12). We obtained HRQoL data at 1 year in 629 of the 777 (81 %) Danish patients, and mean differences between the lower- and higher-threshold group in scores of physical HRQoL were 0.4 (95 % CI -2.4 to 3.1; P = 0.79) and in mental HRQoL 0.5 (95 % CI -3.1 to 4.0; P = 0.79).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term mortality rates and HRQoL did not differ in patients with septic shock and anaemia who were transfused at a haemoglobin threshold of 7 g/dl versus a threshold of 9 g/dl. We may reject a more than 3 % increased hazard of death in the lower- versus higher-threshold group at the time of longest follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood transfusion; Critical care; Hemoglobin; Intensive care unit; Red blood cell transfusion; Septic shock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27686345     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4437-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  35 in total

1.  Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Carson; Michael L Terrin; Helaine Noveck; David W Sanders; Bernard R Chaitman; George G Rhoads; George Nemo; Karen Dragert; Lauren Beaupre; Kevin Hildebrand; William Macaulay; Courtland Lewis; Donald Richard Cook; Gwendolyn Dobbin; Khwaja J Zakriya; Fred S Apple; Rebecca A Horney; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Should blood transfusion be individualised? We are not sure.

Authors:  Annemarie Docherty; Timothy S Walsh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Should red blood cell transfusion be individualized? No.

Authors:  Lars B Holst; Jeffrey L Carson; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Liberal transfusion strategy improves survival in perioperative but not in critically ill patients. A meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  E Fominskiy; A Putzu; F Monaco; A M Scandroglio; A Karaskov; F R B G Galas; L A Hajjar; A Zangrillo; G Landoni
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Liberal or restrictive transfusion after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Gavin J Murphy; Katie Pike; Chris A Rogers; Sarah Wordsworth; Elizabeth A Stokes; Gianni D Angelini; Barnaby C Reeves
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Long-term outcomes in patients with severe sepsis randomised to resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 or Ringer's acetate.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Nicolai Haase; Per Winkel; Anne B Guttormsen; Jyrki Tenhunen; Gudmundur Klemenzson; Rasmus G Müller; Anders Aneman; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies for older mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized pilot trial.

Authors:  Timothy S Walsh; Julia A Boyd; Douglas Watson; David Hope; Steff Lewis; Ashma Krishan; John F Forbes; Pamela Ramsay; Rupert Pearse; Charles Wallis; Christopher Cairns; Stephen Cole; Duncan Wyncoll
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  The determinants of hospital mortality among patients with septic shock receiving appropriate initial antibiotic treatment*.

Authors:  Andrew Labelle; Paul Juang; Richard Reichley; Scott Micek; Justin Hoffmann; Alex Hoban; Nicholas Hampton; Marin Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Quality of life and pruritus in patients with severe sepsis resuscitated with hydroxyethyl starch long-term follow-up of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Piotr Wittbrodt; Nicolai Haase; Dominika Butowska; Robert Winding; Jesper B Poulsen; Anders Perner
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  8 in total

1.  Immunoglobulin G for patients with necrotising soft tissue infection (INSTINCT): a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin B Madsen; Peter B Hjortrup; Marco B Hansen; Theis Lange; Anna Norrby-Teglund; Ole Hyldegaard; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Focus on infection and sepsis 2017.

Authors:  Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Jose Garnacho-Montero; Saad Nseir
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  The intensive care medicine research agenda on septic shock.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Anthony C Gordon; Derek C Angus; Francois Lamontagne; Flavia Machado; James A Russell; Jean-Francois Timsit; John C Marshall; John Myburgh; Manu Shankar-Hari; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Getting down to the real question: effects of transfusion triggers on long-term survival and quality of life following septic shock.

Authors:  Martin W Dünser; James A Russell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Sepsis in a Panorama: What the Cardiovascular Physician Should Know.

Authors:  Deepa B Gotur
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 6.  Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Carson; Simon J Stanworth; Jane A Dennis; Marialena Trivella; Nareg Roubinian; Dean A Fergusson; Darrell Triulzi; Carolyn Dorée; Paul C Hébert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-21

7.  Recommendations on RBC Transfusion in Infants and Children With Acquired and Congenital Heart Disease From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative.

Authors:  Jill M Cholette; Ariane Willems; Stacey L Valentine; Scot T Bateman; Steven M Schwartz
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.624

8.  Recommendations on RBC Transfusions for Critically Ill Children With Nonhemorrhagic Shock From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative.

Authors:  Jennifer A Muszynski; Nina A Guzzetta; Mark W Hall; Duncan Macrae; Stacey L Valentine; Scot T Bateman; Philip C Spinella
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.624

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.