Literature DB >> 28500455

The intensive care medicine research agenda on septic shock.

Anders Perner1, Anthony C Gordon2, Derek C Angus3, Francois Lamontagne4, Flavia Machado5, James A Russell6, Jean-Francois Timsit7, John C Marshall8, John Myburgh9, Manu Shankar-Hari10, Mervyn Singer11.   

Abstract

Septic shock remains a global health challenge with millions of cases every year, high rates of mortality and morbidity, impaired quality of life among survivors and relatives, and high resource use both in developed and developing nations. Care and outcomes are improving through organisational initiatives and updated clinical practice guidelines based on clinical research mainly carried out by large collaborative networks. This progress is likely to continue through the collaborative work of the established and merging trials groups in many parts of the world and through refined trial methodology and translational work. In this review, international experts summarize the current position of clinical research in septic shock and propose a research agenda to advance this field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research; Critical care; ICU; Intensive care; Randomized trials; Sepsis; Septic shock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28500455     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4821-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  102 in total

1.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

2.  Proportion and Cost of Unplanned 30-Day Readmissions After Sepsis Compared With Other Medical Conditions.

Authors:  Florian B Mayr; Victor B Talisa; Vikram Balakumar; Chung-Chou H Chang; Michael Fine; Sachin Yende
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Subphenotypes Respond Differently to Randomized Fluid Management Strategy.

Authors:  Katie R Famous; Kevin Delucchi; Lorraine B Ware; Kirsten N Kangelaris; Kathleen D Liu; B Taylor Thompson; Carolyn S Calfee
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  The Primary Outcome Fails - What Next?

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Zarychanski; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Alexis F Turgeon; Brett L Houston; Lauralyn McIntyre; John C Marshall; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Before-After Study.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Vikramjit Khangoora; Racquel Rivera; Michael H Hooper; John Catravas
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care.

Authors:  John A Myburgh; Simon Finfer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Laurent Billot; Alan Cass; David Gattas; Parisa Glass; Jeffrey Lipman; Bette Liu; Colin McArthur; Shay McGuinness; Dorrilyn Rajbhandari; Colman B Taylor; Steven A R Webb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The RECOVER Program: Disability Risk Groups and 1-Year Outcome after 7 or More Days of Mechanical Ventilation.

Authors:  Margaret S Herridge; Leslie M Chu; Andrea Matte; George Tomlinson; Linda Chan; Claire Thomas; Jan O Friedrich; Sangeeta Mehta; Francois Lamontagne; Melanie Levasseur; Niall D Ferguson; Neill K J Adhikari; Jill C Rudkowski; Hilary Meggison; Yoanna Skrobik; John Flannery; Mark Bayley; Jane Batt; Claudia Dos Santos; Susan E Abbey; Adrienne Tan; Vincent Lo; Sunita Mathur; Matteo Parotto; Denise Morris; Linda Flockhart; Eddy Fan; Christie M Lee; M Elizabeth Wilcox; Najib Ayas; Karen Choong; Robert Fowler; Damon C Scales; Tasnim Sinuff; Brian H Cuthbertson; Louise Rose; Priscila Robles; Stacey Burns; Marcelo Cypel; Lianne Singer; Cecelia Chaparro; Chung-Wai Chow; Shaf Keshavjee; Laurent Brochard; Paul Hebert; Arthur S Slutsky; John C Marshall; Deborah Cook; Jill I Cameron
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  James A Russell; Keith R Walley; Joel Singer; Anthony C Gordon; Paul C Hébert; D James Cooper; Cheryl L Holmes; Sangeeta Mehta; John T Granton; Michelle M Storms; Deborah J Cook; Jeffrey J Presneill; Dieter Ayers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators.

Authors:  D C Angus; A E Barnato; D Bell; R Bellomo; C-R Chong; T J Coats; A Davies; A Delaney; D A Harrison; A Holdgate; B Howe; D T Huang; T Iwashyna; J A Kellum; S L Peake; F Pike; M C Reade; K M Rowan; M Singer; S A R Webb; L A Weissfeld; D M Yealy; J D Young
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  27 in total

1.  Focus on sepsis: new concepts and findings in sepsis care.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Timsit; Etienne Ruppe; Ricard Ferrer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Focus on randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Peter B Hjortrup; Ville Pettilä
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Positive outcomes, mortality rates, and publication bias in septic shock trials.

Authors:  Harm-Jan de Grooth; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Jonne Postema; Stephan A Loer; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; Armand R Girbes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Intravenous iloprost to recruit the microcirculation in septic shock patients?

Authors:  François Dépret; Alexandre Sitbon; Sabri Soussi; Christian De Tymowski; Alice Blet; Alexandre Fratani; Matthieu Legrand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  What's new in ICU in 2050: big data and machine learning.

Authors:  Sébastien Bailly; Geert Meyfroidt; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with shock.

Authors:  James A Russell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Advances in the understanding and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression.

Authors:  Fabienne Venet; Guillaume Monneret
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 8.  Expert statement for the management of hypovolemia in sepsis.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Maurizio Cecconi; Maria Cronhjort; Michael Darmon; Stephan M Jakob; Ville Pettilä; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Restricted fluid resuscitation in suspected sepsis associated hypotension (REFRESH): a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen P J Macdonald; Gerben Keijzers; David McD Taylor; Frances Kinnear; Glenn Arendts; Daniel M Fatovich; Rinaldo Bellomo; David McCutcheon; John F Fraser; Juan-Carlos Ascencio-Lane; Sally Burrows; Edward Litton; Amanda Harley; Matthew Anstey; Ashes Mukherjee
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Morbidity and Mortality in Critically Ill Children. II. A Qualitative Patient-Level Analysis of Pathophysiologies and Potential Therapeutic Solutions.

Authors:  Kathleen L Meert; Russell Banks; Richard Holubkov; Murray M Pollack
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.