Literature DB >> 24807084

Long-term outcomes in patients with severe sepsis randomised to resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 or Ringer's acetate.

Anders Perner1, Nicolai Haase, Per Winkel, Anne B Guttormsen, Jyrki Tenhunen, Gudmundur Klemenzson, Rasmus G Müller, Anders Aneman, Jørn Wetterslev.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed long-term mortality and hospitalisation in patients with severe sepsis resuscitated with hydroxyethyl starch (HES) or Ringer's acetate.
METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated, parallel-grouped, blinded randomised trial using computer-generated allocation sequence and centralised allocation data that included 804 patients with severe sepsis needing fluid resuscitation in 26 general intensive care units (ICUs) in Scandinavia. Patients were allocated to fluid resuscitation using either 6% HES 130/0.42 or Ringer's acetate during ICU admission. We assessed mortality rates at 6 months, 1 year and at the time of longest follow-up and days alive and out of hospital at 1 year.
RESULTS: The vital status of all patients was obtained at a median of 22 (range 13-36) months after randomisation. Mortality rates in the HES versus Ringer's groups at 6 months were 53.3 (212/398 patients) versus 47.5% (190/400) [relative risk 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.29; P = 0.10], respectively; at 1 year, 56.0 (223/398) versus 51.5% (206/400) (1.09; 95% CI 0.96-1.24; P = 0.20), respectively; at the time of longest follow-up, 59.8 (238/398) versus 56.3% (225/400) (1.06; 95% CI 0.94-1.20; P = 0.31), respectively. Percentage of days alive and out of hospital at 1 year in the HES versus Ringer's groups was 24 (0-87 days) versus 63% (0-90) (P = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: The long-term mortality rates did not differ in patients with severe sepsis assigned to HES 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate, but we could not reject a 24% relative increased or a 4% relative decreased mortality at 1 year with HES at the 95% confidence level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24807084     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3311-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  29 in total

1.  Are small hospitals with small intensive care units able to treat patients with severe sepsis?

Authors:  Matti Reinikainen; Sari Karlsson; Tero Varpula; Ilkka Parviainen; Esko Ruokonen; Marjut Varpula; Tero Ala-Kokko; Ville Pettilä
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Randomised trials of 6% tetrastarch (hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or 0.42) for severe sepsis reporting mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Umeer Waheed; Stephen J Brett
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function.

Authors:  Thomas C Mutter; Chelsea A Ruth; Allison B Dart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-23

Review 4.  Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Zarychanski; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Alexis F Turgeon; Brett L Houston; Lauralyn McIntyre; John C Marshall; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care.

Authors:  John A Myburgh; Simon Finfer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Laurent Billot; Alan Cass; David Gattas; Parisa Glass; Jeffrey Lipman; Bette Liu; Colin McArthur; Shay McGuinness; Dorrilyn Rajbhandari; Colman B Taylor; Steven A R Webb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.

Authors:  R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Effects of hydroxyethyl starch in subgroups of patients with severe sepsis: exploratory post-hoc analyses of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Rasmus G Müller; Nicolai Haase; Jørn Wetterslev; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9% NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study.

Authors:  Bertrand Guidet; Olivier Martinet; Thierry Boulain; Francois Philippart; Jean François Poussel; Julien Maizel; Xavier Forceville; Marc Feissel; Michel Hasselmann; Alexandra Heininger; Hugo Van Aken
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Nicolai Haase; Anders Perner; Louise Inkeri Hennings; Martin Siegemund; Bo Lauridsen; Mik Wetterslev; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-15

10.  Quality of life and pruritus in patients with severe sepsis resuscitated with hydroxyethyl starch long-term follow-up of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Piotr Wittbrodt; Nicolai Haase; Dominika Butowska; Robert Winding; Jesper B Poulsen; Anders Perner
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  18 in total

1.  Effect of Hydroxyethyl Starch Solution on Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Suffering from Cerebral Vasospasm Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Martin Kieninger; Daniel Unbekannt; André Schneiker; Barbara Sinner; Sylvia Bele; Christopher Prasser
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  The intensive care medicine research agenda on septic shock.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Anthony C Gordon; Derek C Angus; Francois Lamontagne; Flavia Machado; James A Russell; Jean-Francois Timsit; John C Marshall; John Myburgh; Manu Shankar-Hari; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 for bolus resuscitation in severe sepsis: long-term follow-up, confidence intervals and clinically important differences in outcomes.

Authors:  Gordon S Doig; Fiona Simpson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Focus on acute kidney injury and fluids.

Authors:  Miet Schetz; Michael Darmon; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Getting down to the real question: effects of transfusion triggers on long-term survival and quality of life following septic shock.

Authors:  Martin W Dünser; James A Russell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Sepsis: frontiers in supportive care, organisation and research.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Andrew Rhodes; Bala Venkatesh; Derek C Angus; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jean-Louis Vincent; John Marshall; Konrad Reinhart; Michael Joannidis; Steven M Opal
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Influence of red blood cell aggregation on perfusion of an artificial microvascular network.

Authors:  Walter H Reinhart; Nathaniel Z Piety; Sergey S Shevkoplyas
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 8.  Septic Shock: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Matthew R Rosengart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Long-term outcomes in patients with septic shock transfused at a lower versus a higher haemoglobin threshold: the TRISS randomised, multicentre clinical trial.

Authors:  Sofie L Rygård; Lars B Holst; Jørn Wetterslev; Per Winkel; Pär I Johansson; Jan Wernerman; Anne B Guttormsen; Sari Karlsson; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Choice of Fluid Therapy in the Initial Management of Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, and Septic Shock.

Authors:  Ronald Chang; John B Holcomb
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.