Literature DB >> 35708898

Meaningful stimuli inflate the role of proactive interference in visual working memory.

Roy Shoval1, Tal Makovski2.   

Abstract

The use of meaningful daily objects in visual working memory (VWM) tasks revealed two uncharacteristic findings: enlarged memory capacity, and strong proactive interference (PI), which was previously believed to play only a modest role in VWM. To disassociate the roles of meaning and visual complexity in these effects, a set of stimuli composed of meaningful daily objects was compared to visually similar meaningless sets. These sets were included in a Repeated (PI-prone) condition in which stimuli were repeatedly drawn from a limited set of items, and in a Unique (PI-free) condition in which each stimulus appeared only once. In line with past findings, the results consistently showed superior memory for meaningful stimuli. Importantly, they also showed a stronger PI-effect for meaningful stimuli as the difference between the Repeated and Unique conditions was greatly reduced (Experiment 1) or eliminated (Experiment 2) for meaningless stimuli. Together, these results strongly imply that meaning, and not visual complexity, plays a key role not only in boosting memory capacity but also in inflating the role of PI in VWM.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Proactive interference; Semantic categorization; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35708898     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01338-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Binding across space and time in visual working memory.

Authors:  Paul Johan Karlsen; Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Meaning in learning: Contextual cueing relies on objects' visual features and not on objects' meaning.

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

Review 5.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  Binding in visual working memory: the role of the episodic buffer.

Authors:  Alan D Baddeley; Richard J Allen; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The cost of proactive interference is constant across presentation conditions.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress; Aneela Siddique
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2016-08-25

9.  Proactive interference does not meaningfully distort visual working memory capacity estimates in the canonical change detection task.

Authors:  Po-Han Lin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.