Literature DB >> 27681857

Biomechanical Analysis of the Individual Ligament Contributions to Syndesmotic Stability.

Thomas O Clanton1,2, Brady T Williams1, Jonathon D Backus1,2, Grant J Dornan1, Daniel J Liechti1, Scott R Whitlow1,2, Adriana J Saroki1, Travis Lee Turnbull1, Robert F LaPrade1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical data and contributions to ankle joint stability have been previously reported for the individual distal tibiofibular ligaments. These results have not yet been validated based on recent anatomic descriptions or using current biomechanical testing devices.
METHODS: Eight matched-pair, lower leg specimens were tested using a dynamic, biaxial testing machine. The proximal tibiofibular joint and the medial and lateral ankle ligaments were left intact. After fixation, specimens were preconditioned and then biomechanically tested following sequential cutting of the tibiofibular ligaments to assess the individual ligamentous contributions to syndesmotic stability. Matched paired specimens were randomly divided into 1 of 2 cutting sequences: (1) anterior-to-posterior: intact, anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), interosseous tibiofibular ligament (ITFL), deep posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), superficial PITFL, and complete interosseous membrane; (2) posterior-to-anterior: intact, superficial PITFL, deep PITFL, ITFL, AITFL, and complete interosseous membrane. While under a 750-N axial compressive load, the foot was rotated to 15 degrees of external rotation and 10 degrees of internal rotation for each sectioned state. Torque (Nm), rotational position (degrees), and 3-dimensional data were recorded continuously throughout testing.
RESULTS: Testing of the intact ankle syndesmosis under simulated physiologic conditions revealed 4.3 degrees of fibular rotation in the axial plane and 3.3 mm of fibular translation in the sagittal plane. Significant increases in fibular sagittal translation and axial rotation were observed after syndesmotic injury, particularly after sectioning of the AITFL and superficial PITFL. Sequential sectioning of the syndesmotic ligaments resulted in significant reductions in resistance to both internal and external rotation. Isolated injuries to the AITFL resulted in the most substantial reduction of resistance to external rotation (average of 24%). However, resistance to internal rotation was not significantly diminished until the majority of the syndesmotic structures had been sectioned.
CONCLUSION: The ligaments of the syndesmosis provide significant contributions to rotary stability of the distal tibiofibular joint within the physiologic range of motion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study defined normal motion of the syndesmosis and the biomechanical consequences of injury. The degree of instability was increased with each additional injured structure; however, isolated injuries to the AITFL alone may lead to significant external rotary instability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament; biomechanics; interosseous tibiofibular ligament; posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament; syndesmosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27681857     DOI: 10.1177/1071100716666277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  24 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Maxwell W Weinberg; Nathan P Davidson; Megan K Mills; Beat Hintermann; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Torque application helps to diagnose incomplete syndesmotic injuries using weight-bearing computed tomography images.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Travis L Bailey; Angela P Presson; Chelsea McCarty Allen; Heath B Henninger; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Morphometric analysis of the incisura fibularis in patients with unstable high ankle sprains.

Authors:  Wouter Huysse; Arne Burssens; Matthias Peiffer; Bert Cornelis; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Kristian Buedts; Emmanuel A Audenaert
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Ankle stability in ankle fracture.

Authors:  Laura-Ann Lambert; Luke Falconer; Lyndon Mason
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-03-28

5.  Anatomic Syndesmotic and Deltoid Ligament Reconstruction with Flexible Implants: A Technique Description.

Authors:  Christina J Hajewski; Kyle Duchman; Jessica Goetz; John Femino
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

Review 6.  [Fractures of the anterolateral tibial rim : The fourth malleolus].

Authors:  Stefan Rammelt; Jan Bartoníček; Annika Pauline Neumann; Livia Kroker
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Fixation of anterolateral distal tibial fractures: the anterior malleolus.

Authors:  Stefan Rammelt; Jan Bartoníček; Tim Schepers; Livia Kroker
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  [Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury].

Authors:  Hui Huang; Yunfeng Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-10-15

Review 9.  Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Massimo De Filippo; Daniele Casalini; Alberto Longhi; Fabrizio Tacci; Rocco Perotta; Francesco Pagnini; Silvio Tocco; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  Anatomic Repair vs Closed Reduction of the Syndesmosis.

Authors:  Christopher Del Balso; Al-Walid Hamam; Moaz Bin Yunus Chohan; Christina Tieszer; Abdel-Rahman Lawendy; David William Sanders
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.