Krystallia Mantziki1, Carry M Renders2, Achilleas Vassilopoulos3, Gabriella Radulian4, Jean-Michel Borys5, Hugues du Plessis5, Maria João Gregório6, Pedro Graça6,7, Stefaan de Henauw8, Svetoslav Handjiev9, Tommy L S Visscher2,10,11, Jacob C Seidell2. 1. Department of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. k.mantziki@vu.nl. 2. Department of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 4. "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania. 5. EPODE European Network Coordinating Team, Proteines, Paris, France. 6. Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. 7. Directorate General of Health, Lisbon, Portugal. 8. Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 9. Bulgarian Association for the study of Obesity and related diseases, Sofia, Bulgaria. 10. Research Centre for the Prevention of Overweight, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands. 11. Research Centre for the Prevention of Overweight, VU University, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing social inequalities in health across Europe are widening the gap between low and high socio-economic groups, notably in the prevalence of obesity. Public health interventions may result in differential effects across population groups. Therefore, the EPHE (EPODE for the Promotion of Health Equity) project analysed the added value of community-based programmes, based on the EPODE (Ensemble Prévenons l'Obésité Des Enfants-Together Let's Prevent Obesity) model, to reduce socio-economic inequalities in energy balance-related behaviours of children and their family-environmental related determinants in seven European communities. This study presents the changes between baseline and follow-up after the one-year interventions and their sustainability one year after. METHODS: This is a prospective study with a one school-year intervention, followed by one year of follow-up. In all, 1266 children (age 6-8 years) and their families from different socio-economic backgrounds were recruited at baseline. For 1062 children, information was available after one year (T1) and for 921 children after two years (T2). A self-reported questionnaire was completed by the parents to examine the children's energy balance-related behaviours and family- environmental determinants. Socio-economic status was defined by the educational level of the mother. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data was used to test the differences between baseline and intermediate, and between intermediate and final, measurements for each of the socio-economic status groups. RESULTS: Post-intervention effects in energy-balance related behaviours showed the following improvements among the low socio-economic status groups: increased fruit consumption (Netherlands), decreased fruit juices amount consumed (Romania) and decreased TV time on weekdays (Belgium). Whereas in only the latter case the behavioural change was accompanied with an improvement in a family-environmental determinant (monitoring the time the child watches TV), other improvements in parental rules and practices related to soft drinks/fruit juices and TV exposure were observed. A few of those effects were sustainable, notably in the case of Belgium. CONCLUSIONS: Inequalities in obesity-related behaviours could be potentially reduced when implementing community-based interventions, tailored to inequality gaps and using the EPODE methodology. Within-group changes varied widely, whereas monitoring of interventions and process evaluation are crucial to understand the observed results.
BACKGROUND: Increasing social inequalities in health across Europe are widening the gap between low and high socio-economic groups, notably in the prevalence of obesity. Public health interventions may result in differential effects across population groups. Therefore, the EPHE (EPODE for the Promotion of Health Equity) project analysed the added value of community-based programmes, based on the EPODE (Ensemble Prévenons l'Obésité Des Enfants-Together Let's Prevent Obesity) model, to reduce socio-economic inequalities in energy balance-related behaviours of children and their family-environmental related determinants in seven European communities. This study presents the changes between baseline and follow-up after the one-year interventions and their sustainability one year after. METHODS: This is a prospective study with a one school-year intervention, followed by one year of follow-up. In all, 1266 children (age 6-8 years) and their families from different socio-economic backgrounds were recruited at baseline. For 1062 children, information was available after one year (T1) and for 921 children after two years (T2). A self-reported questionnaire was completed by the parents to examine the children's energy balance-related behaviours and family- environmental determinants. Socio-economic status was defined by the educational level of the mother. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data was used to test the differences between baseline and intermediate, and between intermediate and final, measurements for each of the socio-economic status groups. RESULTS: Post-intervention effects in energy-balance related behaviours showed the following improvements among the low socio-economic status groups: increased fruit consumption (Netherlands), decreased fruit juices amount consumed (Romania) and decreased TV time on weekdays (Belgium). Whereas in only the latter case the behavioural change was accompanied with an improvement in a family-environmental determinant (monitoring the time the child watches TV), other improvements in parental rules and practices related to soft drinks/fruit juices and TV exposure were observed. A few of those effects were sustainable, notably in the case of Belgium. CONCLUSIONS: Inequalities in obesity-related behaviours could be potentially reduced when implementing community-based interventions, tailored to inequality gaps and using the EPODE methodology. Within-group changes varied widely, whereas monitoring of interventions and process evaluation are crucial to understand the observed results.
Entities:
Keywords:
EPODE; Evaluation; Health inequalities; Lifestyle behaviours; Parenting practices
Authors: K Bammann; W Gwozdz; A Lanfer; G Barba; S De Henauw; G Eiben; J M Fernandez-Alvira; E Kovács; L Lissner; L A Moreno; M Tornaritis; T Veidebaum; I Pigeot Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Maartje M van Stralen; Saskia J te Velde; Amika S Singh; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Marloes K Martens; Maria van der Sluis; Yannis Manios; Evangelia Grammatikaki; Mai J M Chinapaw; Lea Maes; Elling Bere; Jorgen Jensen; Luis Moreno; Nataša Jan; Dénes Molnár; Helen Moore; Johannes Brug Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rory McGill; Elspeth Anwar; Lois Orton; Helen Bromley; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Martin O'Flaherty; David Taylor-Robinson; Maria Guzman-Castillo; Duncan Gillespie; Patricia Moreira; Kirk Allen; Lirije Hyseni; Nicola Calder; Mark Petticrew; Martin White; Margaret Whitehead; Simon Capewell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: F C Hillier-Brown; C L Bambra; J-M Cairns; A Kasim; H J Moore; C D Summerbell Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Sacha R B Verjans-Janssen; Sanne M P L Gerards; Stef P J Kremers; Steven B Vos; Maria W J Jansen; Dave H H Van Kann Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Adam Drewnowski; Benjamin Caballero; Jai K Das; Jeff French; Andrew M Prentice; Lisa R Fries; Tessa M van Koperen; Petra Klassen-Wigger; Barbara J Rolls Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 7.110