Katherine L Pearson1,2, Nigel J Hall3,4. 1. Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK. 2. University Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 3. University Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. n.j.hall@soton.ac.uk. 4. Department of Paediatric Surgery and Urology, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK. n.j.hall@soton.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are standard practice in adult specialties resulting in improved outcomes. It is unclear whether ERAS principles are applicable to Paediatric Surgery. We performed a scoping review to identify the extent to which ERAS has been used in Paediatric Surgery, the nature of interventions, and outcomes. METHODS: Pubmed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Embase were searched using the terms enhanced recovery, post-operative protocol/pathway, fast track surgery, and paediatric surgery. Studies were excluded if they did not include abdominal/thoracic/urological procedures in children. RESULTS: Nine studies were identified (2003-2014; total 1269 patients): three case control studies, one retrospective review and five prospective implementations, no RCTs. Interventional elements identified were post-operative feeding, mobilisation protocols, morphine-sparing analgesia, reduced use of nasogastric tubes and urinary catheters. Outcomes reported included post-operative length of stay (LOS), time to oral feeding and stooling, complications, and parent satisfaction. Fast-track programmes significantly reduced LOS in 6/7 studies, time to oral feeding in 3/3 studies, and time to stooling in 2/3 studies. CONCLUSION: The use of ERAS pathways in Paediatric surgery appears very limited but such pathways may have benefits in children. Prospective studies should evaluate interventions used in adult ERAS on appropriate outcomes in the paediatric setting.
PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are standard practice in adult specialties resulting in improved outcomes. It is unclear whether ERAS principles are applicable to Paediatric Surgery. We performed a scoping review to identify the extent to which ERAS has been used in Paediatric Surgery, the nature of interventions, and outcomes. METHODS: Pubmed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Embase were searched using the terms enhanced recovery, post-operative protocol/pathway, fast track surgery, and paediatric surgery. Studies were excluded if they did not include abdominal/thoracic/urological procedures in children. RESULTS: Nine studies were identified (2003-2014; total 1269 patients): three case control studies, one retrospective review and five prospective implementations, no RCTs. Interventional elements identified were post-operative feeding, mobilisation protocols, morphine-sparing analgesia, reduced use of nasogastric tubes and urinary catheters. Outcomes reported included post-operative length of stay (LOS), time to oral feeding and stooling, complications, and parent satisfaction. Fast-track programmes significantly reduced LOS in 6/7 studies, time to oral feeding in 3/3 studies, and time to stooling in 2/3 studies. CONCLUSION: The use of ERAS pathways in Paediatric surgery appears very limited but such pathways may have benefits in children. Prospective studies should evaluate interventions used in adult ERAS on appropriate outcomes in the paediatric setting.
Entities:
Keywords:
Enhanced recovery after surgery; Fast track; Paediatric surgery; Post-operative
Authors: Marc Reismann; Mirja von Kampen; Birgit Laupichler; Robert Suempelmann; Annika I Schmidt; Benno M Ure Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Julia K Shinnick; Heather L Short; Kurt F Heiss; Matthew T Santore; Martin L Blakely; Mehul V Raval Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Anthony I Squillaro; Shadassa Ourshalimian; Cory M McLaughlin; Ashwini Lakshmanan; Philippe Friedlich; Cynthia Gong; Ashley Song; Lorraine I Kelley-Quon Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Yvonne Y Chan; Ilina Rosoklija; Patrick Meade; Nicholas E Burjek; Mehul V Raval; Elizabeth B Yerkes; Kyle O Rove; David I Chu Journal: J Pediatr Urol Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 1.921
Authors: Mary E Brindle; Caraline McDiarmid; Kristin Short; Kathleen Miller; Ali MacRobie; Jennifer Y K Lam; Megan Brockel; Mehul V Raval; Alexandra Howlett; Kyong-Soon Lee; Martin Offringa; Kenneth Wong; David de Beer; Tomas Wester; Erik D Skarsgard; Paul W Wales; Annie Fecteau; Beth Haliburton; Susan M Goobie; Gregg Nelson Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.352