BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Fast-track surgery is not well established for infants and children. The aim of our prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of fast-track concepts for pediatric surgical procedures including laparoscopic techniques. METHODS: Fast-track concepts, including immediate postoperative feeding, immediate mobilization, and morphine sparing pain treatment, were established for pyeloplasty, appendectomy, bowel anastomosis, fundoplication, hypospadia repair, and full/partial nephrectomy. All consecutive patients undergoing these procedures were prospectively investigated from June 2004 to June 2005. Patients with additional relevant diseases, reoperation, and perforated appendicitis were excluded from fast-track treatment. The length of hospital stay was compared with data derived from the German reimbursement system with German diagnosis-related groups for patients with a similar case mix index and hospitals with a similar structure. RESULTS: Of a total of 159 patients (mean age, 5.8 +/- 5.3 years), 113 (71%) were finally treated according to the fast-track protocols. There were no complications associated with fast-track surgery. The intensity of pain during the immediate postoperative period was higher than 5 on a 10-point scale in children older than 4 years. Analgesia was excellent at all other time points. The mean hospital stay of fast-track patients was 2.3 +/- 1 days and was significantly shorter (P < .01) compared with German diagnosis-related group data for all procedures (pyeloplasty, 1.9 +/- 0.9 vs 12.2 +/- 0.2; nephrectomy, 1.9 +/- 1.0 vs 14.4 +/- 2.8; bowel anastomosis, 3.2 +/- 0.6 vs 12.9 +/- 2.4; fundoplication, 3.2 +/- 0.8 vs 15.2 +/- 4.2; appendectomy, 3.7 +/- 2.4 vs 6.3 +/- 1.8; hypospadia repair, 2.1 +/- 1 vs 8.4 +/- 1.4). Two readmissions were recorded. Ninety-six percent of patients and parents scored the fast-track concepts as excellent. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of fast-track concepts in children is excellent, with short duration of hospitalization and high comfort.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Fast-track surgery is not well established for infants and children. The aim of our prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of fast-track concepts for pediatric surgical procedures including laparoscopic techniques. METHODS: Fast-track concepts, including immediate postoperative feeding, immediate mobilization, and morphine sparing pain treatment, were established for pyeloplasty, appendectomy, bowel anastomosis, fundoplication, hypospadia repair, and full/partial nephrectomy. All consecutive patients undergoing these procedures were prospectively investigated from June 2004 to June 2005. Patients with additional relevant diseases, reoperation, and perforated appendicitis were excluded from fast-track treatment. The length of hospital stay was compared with data derived from the German reimbursement system with German diagnosis-related groups for patients with a similar case mix index and hospitals with a similar structure. RESULTS: Of a total of 159 patients (mean age, 5.8 +/- 5.3 years), 113 (71%) were finally treated according to the fast-track protocols. There were no complications associated with fast-track surgery. The intensity of pain during the immediate postoperative period was higher than 5 on a 10-point scale in children older than 4 years. Analgesia was excellent at all other time points. The mean hospital stay of fast-track patients was 2.3 +/- 1 days and was significantly shorter (P < .01) compared with German diagnosis-related group data for all procedures (pyeloplasty, 1.9 +/- 0.9 vs 12.2 +/- 0.2; nephrectomy, 1.9 +/- 1.0 vs 14.4 +/- 2.8; bowel anastomosis, 3.2 +/- 0.6 vs 12.9 +/- 2.4; fundoplication, 3.2 +/- 0.8 vs 15.2 +/- 4.2; appendectomy, 3.7 +/- 2.4 vs 6.3 +/- 1.8; hypospadia repair, 2.1 +/- 1 vs 8.4 +/- 1.4). Two readmissions were recorded. Ninety-six percent of patients and parents scored the fast-track concepts as excellent. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of fast-track concepts in children is excellent, with short duration of hospitalization and high comfort.
Authors: Linda C Lee; Niki Kanaroglou; Joseph M Gleason; Joao L Pippi Salle; Darius J Bägli; Martin A Koyle; Armando J Lorenzo Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Milan Kaska; Tat'ána Grosmanová; Eduard Havel; Radomír Hyspler; Zbynka Petrová; Miroslav Brtko; Pavel Bares; David Bares; Bronislava Schusterová; Lucie Pyszková; Vlasta Tosnerová; Martin Sluka Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Jens Dingemann; Joachim F Kuebler; Mathias Wolters; Mirja von Kampen; Wilhelm A Osthaus; Benno M Ure; Marc Reismann Journal: World J Urol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Cristen N Litz; Sandra M Farach; Allison M Fernandez; Richard Elliott; Jenny Dolan; Will Nelson; Nebbie E Walford; Christopher Snyder; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Ernest K Amankwah; Paul D Danielson; Nicole M Chandler Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Martin Lothar Metzelder; J F Kuebler; S Glueer; R Suempelmann; B M Ure; C Petersen Journal: World J Urol Date: 2009-05-23 Impact factor: 4.226