| Literature DB >> 27677183 |
Camila T França1,2, Wen-Qiang He2,3, Jakub Gruszczyk3, Nicholas T Y Lim3, Enmoore Lin4, Benson Kiniboro4, Peter M Siba4, Wai-Hong Tham2,3, Ivo Mueller1,2,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major gaps in our understanding of Plasmodium vivax biology and the acquisition of immunity to this parasite hinder vaccine development. P. vivax merozoites exclusively invade reticulocytes, making parasite proteins that mediate reticulocyte binding and/or invasion potential key vaccine or drug targets. While protein interactions that mediate invasion are still poorly understood, the P. vivax Reticulocyte-Binding Protein family (PvRBP) is thought to be involved in P. vivax restricted host-cell selectivity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27677183 PMCID: PMC5038947 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Total and IgG subclass reactivity to PvRBPs in young Papua New Guinean children.
| PvRBP1a | PvRBP1b | PvRBP2a | PvRBP2b | PvRBP2cNB | PvRBP2-P2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total IgG | IgG1 | IgG3 | Total IgG | IgG1 | Total IgG | IgG1 | IgG3 | Total IgG | IgG1 | Total IgG | IgG1 | Total IgG | IgG1 | IgG3 | |
| Level | |||||||||||||||
| Median | 0.0025 (12.3) | 0.0051 (25.5) | 0.0002 (0.85) | 0.0019 (9.6) | 0.0054 (27.0) | 0.0035 (17.3) | 0.0037 (18.5) | 0.0002 (0.91) | 0.0029 (14.4) | 0.0067 (33.4) | 0.0006 (3.0) | 0.0011 (5.3) | 0.0095 (47.4) | 0.0057 (28.5) | 0.0031 (15.5) |
| IQR | 0.0010 (5.1) | 0.0025 (12.5) | 0.0001 (0.32) | 0.0010 (5.0) | 0.0033 (16.3) | 0.0013 (6.7) | 0.0011 (5.7) | 0.0001 (0.46) | 0.0013 (6.5) | 0.0024 (11.8) | 0.0003 (1.5) | 0.0005 (2.7) | 0.0041 (20.5) | 0.0025 (12.7) | 0.0012 (5.8) |
| 0.0053 (26.3) | 0.0094 (46.8) | 0.0006 (3.1) | 0.0041 (20.4) | 0.0105 (52.3) | 0.0101 (50.4) | 0.0132 (65.8) | 0.0005 (2.8) | 0.0059 (29.6) | 0.0149 (74.6) | 0.0015 (7.7) | 0.0025 (12.7) | 0.0181 (90.1) | 0.0128 (64.1) | 0.0079 (39.7) | |
| Cut-off | 0.0013 (6.3) | 0.0031 (15.6) | 0.0001 (0.47) | 0.0013 (6.4) | 0.0039 (19.7) | 0.0017 (8.6) | 0.0017 (8.5) | 0.0001 (0.56) | 0.0019 (9.6) | 0.0037 (18.5) | 0.0004 (2.0) | 0.0007 (3.4) | 0.0056 (27.9) | 0.0033 (16.8) | 0.0016 (7.9) |
| Cut-off | 0.0038 (19.0) | 0.0077 (38.5) | 0.0004 (2.0) | 0.0029 (14.5) | 0.0078 (39.2) | 0.0074 (36.9) | 0.0086 (43.1) | 0.0003 (1.7) | 0.0046 (23.0) | 0.0119 (59.7) | 0.0010 (5.10) | 0.0018 (9.1) | 0.0145 (72.3) | 0.0107 (53.4) | 0.0053 (26.4) |
| Cumulative prevalence in children, n (%) | |||||||||||||||
| % of adult levels (antibody cut-off value | |||||||||||||||
| 1% (≥ 0.0002) | 221 (98.7) | 224 (100.0) | 106 (47.3) | 222 (99.1) | 224 (100.0) | 222 (99.1) | 218 (97.3) | 107 (47.8) | 223 (90.6) | 223 (99.6) | 190 (84.8) | 214 (95.5) | 224 (100.0) | 223 (99.6) | 215 (96.0) |
| 5% (≥ 0.001) | 169 (75.5) | 216 (96.4) | 34 (15.2) | 169 (75.5) | 218 (97.3) | 182 (81.2) | 174 (77.7) | 23 (10.3) | 181 (80.8) | 211 (94.2) | 77 (34.4) | 115 (51.3) | 223 (99.6) | 209 (93.3) | 175 (78.1) |
| 10% (≥ 0.002) | 127 (56.7) | 184 (82.1) | 16 (7.1) | 109 (48.7) | 208 (92.9) | 139 (62.1) | 139 (62.1) | 9 (4.0) | 147 (65.6) | 177 (79.0) | 45 (20.1) | 67 (29.9) | 212 (94.6) | 186 (83.0) | 142 (63.4) |
| 25% (≥ 0.005) | 57 (25.5) | 114 (50.9) | 3 (1.3) | 49 (21.9) | 123 (54.9) | 94 (42.0) | 104 (46.4) | 0 (0.0) | 65 (29.0) | 135 (60.3) | 27 (12.1) | 33 (14.7) | 158 (70.5) | 119 (53.1) | 77 (34.4) |
| 50% (≥ 0.01) | 28 (12.5) | 46 (20.5) | 1 (0.45) | 17 (7.6) | 57 (25.5) | 56 (25.0) | 67 (29.9) | 0 (0.0) | 22 (9.8) | 83 (37.1) | 15 (6.7) | 19 (8.5) | 105 (46.9) | 80 (35.7) | 46 (20.5) |
Abbreviations: IQR = Interquartile range
*Values in arbitrary units. Values were interpolated from standard curves using a 5PL logistic regression model.
Fig 1Erythrocyte-binding preferences of 6 PvRBPs.
A: Bar charts showing the percentage of binding of CD71-PECy5 (control), PvRBP1a, PvRBP1b, PvRBP2a, PvRBP2b, PvRBP2cNB, PvRBP2-P2 to mature erythrocytes (not stained with thiazole orange, TO-) vs reticulocytes (stained with thiazole orange, TO+) populations. Error bars represent SEM of 7 or 9 independent repeats. B: Dot plots show the binding of six PvRBP proteins to an enriched reticulocyte population. Binding was detected using an anti-PvRBP rabbit IgG antibody followed by a secondary anti-rabbit Alexa 647 antibody.
Fig 2Detection of PvRBPs by rabbit anti-PvRBP polyclonal antibodies by ELISA.
Microtiter wells were coated with each PvRBP per well as shown by symbols on the left. Solid lines show specific anti-PvRBPs polyclonal antibodies (top label) added to each plate in a dilution series. The optical density (OD) was measured at 405 nm. Mean OD values from duplicated wells and standard deviation are shown.
Fig 3Association between total IgG to 6 PvRBPs age and exposure in 224 young Papua New Guinea children.
A & B: Data are plotted as Lowess smoothed curves of total IgG levels (arbitrary units) by age and life-time exposure respectively. Life-time exposure was calculated as age multiplied by molFOB. Correlation coefficients (rho) and P-values from Spearman’s rank test. C: Boxplots show median total IgG levels (arbitrary units) and range (whiskers) by infection status detected by PCR. Clear boxes show low antibody levels, dotted boxes show medium antibody levels and grey boxes show high antibody levels. P-values from Kruskal-Wallis test. For all analysis, P < 0.05 were deemed significant.
Fig 4Association between total and IgG subclasses to 6 PvRBPs and protection against clinical malaria (density > 500/μL) in 224 young Papua New Guinean children.
Data are plotted as exposure (molFOB), age, season and village of residency adjusted incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Incidence rate ratios, 95% confidence intervals and P-values from GEE models. P < 0.05 were deemed significant. ****P < 0.001; ***P = 0.001; ** P > 0.001 to 0.01; *P > 0.01 to 0.05.