Literature DB >> 27670257

Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in germline BRCA mutation carriers with breast cancer: significance of bilateral RRSO at the optimal age in germline BRCA mutation carriers.

Young Jae Lee1, Shin Wha Lee2, Kyu Rae Kim3, Kyung Hae Jung4, Jong Won Lee5, Yong Man Kim1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most BRCA1/2 carriers do not undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) by the recommended age. This study aimed to find the incidence of precursor lesions and cancer after RRSO.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed breast cancer patients identified as BRCA mutation carriers who underwent RRSO at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, from 2010 to 2014. From 2013, all cases were examined according to the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbria (SEE/FIM) protocol and underwent immunohistochemically staining. RRSO was performed in 63 patients, 27 in 2010 to 2012 and 36 in 2013 to 2014.
RESULTS: The median age at RRSO was 46.5 years (range, 32 to 73 years). Occult invasive cancer was detected in eight patients, of ovarian origin in five and of tubal origin in three. All occult invasive cancer cases with metastasis were detected in patients older than 40 years. Of the 36 patients from the 2013 to 2014 cohort, seven showed p53 overexpression, one showed Ki-67 overexpression, two showed serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, and three showed occult cancer. The detection rate of precursor lesions or cancer was 36.1% (13/36). In the analysis according to age, precursor lesions were more common in BRCA1 mutation carriers younger than 40 years old (66.7% vs. 20.0%). In BRCA2 mutation carriers, precursor lesions were only detected in those older than 40 years of age, indicating the possible faster occurrence of precursor lesions in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
CONCLUSION: Many patients still tend to delay RRSO until after they are 40 years old. Our findings support the significance of RRSO before the age of 40 in germline BRCA mutation carriers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy; Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27670257      PMCID: PMC5165071          DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 2005-0380            Impact factor:   4.401


INTRODUCTION

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common histologic subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, accounting for almost 70% of cases, and >75% of HGSOC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Up to 20% of patients with HGSOC have a BRCA1 or 2 germline mutation and the prevalence of mutation were more common in patients with a strong family history [12]. BRCA1 and 2 are tumor suppressor genes that play a role in chromosomal damage repair. Mutations in these genes are associated with increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 germline mutation carriers have a 40% to 60% risk of developing HGSOC in their lifetime, whereas the risk is 11% to 27% for BRCA2 germline mutation carriers. These carriers are thus offered risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) by age 40 by gynecologic oncologists according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, most BRCA1/2 carriers do not undergo RRSO by this age [3]. Since the discovery that tubal intraepithelial carcinomas are the premalignant lesion of HGSOC in women with a BRCA mutation, the significance of RRSO until the guideline-recommended age and comprehensive histopathologic examination of the fallopian tubes obtained has increased [456]. However, there are limited data on the optimal age for RRSO based on the prevalence of premalignant lesions or occult cancer at RRSO. Here, we analyzed the median age of RRSO in BRCA mutation carriers with a history of breast cancer and estimated the prevalence of precursor lesions including serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) and occult invasive cancer in RRSO specimens to help identify the optimal age to undergo RRSO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with breast cancer who were identified as BRCA mutation carriers and underwent RRSO at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, from 2010 to 2014. Medical records were reviewed for parity, family history, BRCA mutation status, history of tamoxifen use, and age at RRSO. From 2013, both fallopian tubes of all cases were examined according to the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbria (SEE/FIM) protocol and underwent immunohistochemical staining for p53 and Ki67. Pathology slides from 2010 to 2012 were merely reviewed to identify occult cancer. Thus, we could not review the data on precursor lesions because they were not examined according to the SEE/FIM protocol in the fallopian tube, especially at the fimbriated end. All slides were reviewed by an expert gynecological pathologist. We obtained Institutional Review Board approval for these studies (S2016-0051-0002). The relationships between variable characteristics and the detection rate of precursor lesions or occult cancer were assessed by univariate analysis using chi-square and Fisher exact tests and by multivariate analysis using logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for precursor lesions or occult cancer. To analyze the relationship between patient age and the detection rate of precursor lesions or occult cancer at RRSO, patient age was dichotomized as ≤40 and >40 years. Descriptive statistics and data analysis were performed using SPSS ver. 20.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2014, 63 patients with breast cancer who were identified as BRCA mutation carriers underwent RRSO at our institution, 27 patients from 2010 to 2012 and 36 patients from 2013 to 2014. The characteristics of the 63 patients are summarized in Table 1. Of the 63 patients, 38 were BRCA1 mutation carriers and 25 were BRCA2 mutation carriers. The median age at RRSO was 46.5 years (range, 32 to 73 years) and only one patient was nulliparous at the time of RRSO. Regarding tamoxifen use, 14 patients were current users, 10 were former users, and 39 had never used tamoxifen. There was a family history of ovarian or tubal or peritoneal cancer in 13 patients and 33 patients had a family history of breast cancer. In statistical analysis, tamoxifen use (p=0.736) and family history (p=1.000) were not associated with the detection rate of precursor lesions or occult cancer at RRSO. RRSO was performed before the age of 40 in 13 of the 63 patients (20.6%). The frequency of precursor lesions (p53 overexpression, Ki67 overexpression, STIC) and occult cancer in the 36 patients treated from 2013 to 2014 is indicated in Table 2. Of these 36 patients, seven showed p53 overexpression, one showed Ki-67 overexpression, two showed STIC, and three showed occult cancer according to the SEE/FIM protocol. The primary site of all precursor lesions was the distal tube. The detection rate of precursor lesions or cancer was 36.1% (13/36).
Table 1

Characteristics of the 63 patients with breast cancer in this study who were identified as BRCA mutation carriers and underwent RRSO

VariableNo. of patients (%)
Age at RRSO (yr), median (range)46.5 (32–73)
BRCA mutation status
BRCA1 mutation38 (60.3)
BRCA2 mutation25 (39.7)
Nulliparous1 (1.6)
Tamoxifen use
Current14 (22.2)
Former10 (15.9)
Never39 (61.9)
Family history
Ovarian or tubal or peritoneal cancer
No50 (79.4)
Yes13 (20.6)
Breast cancer
No30 (47.6)
Yes33 (52.4)

RRSO, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Table 2

Frequency of precursor lesions and occult cancer in 36 study patients with breast cancer who were identified as BRCA mutation carriers and underwent RRSO in 2013 to 2014

VariableBRCA1 (n=23)BRCA2 (n=13)
p53 overexpression4 (17.4)3 (23.1)
Ki67 overexpression1 (4.3)0
Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma.1 (4.3)1 (7.7)
Cancer2 (8.7)1 (7.7)
Total8 (34.8)5 (38.5)

Values are presented as number (%).

RRSO, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

RRSO, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Values are presented as number (%). RRSO, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. The relationship between patient age and the detection rate of precursor lesions or occult cancer at RRSO in 2013 to 2014 is indicated in Table 3. There was no statistically significant relationship. However, in the BRCA1 mutation group, patients who underwent RRSO before 40 years of age were more likely to have precursor lesions. In the BRCA2 mutation group, precursor lesions were only detected in patients who were older than 40 when they underwent RRSO. In addition, all three patients who were found to have occult cancer were older than 40 when they underwent RRSO.
Table 3

Relationship between patient age and the detection rate of precursor lesion or occult cancer at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in 2013 to 2014

Variable≤40 yr (n=6)>40 yr (n=30)p-value
Precursor lesion
BRCA12/3 (66.7)4/20 (20.0)0.155
BRCA20/34/10 (40.0)0.497
BRCA1/22/6 (33.3)8/30 (26.7)>0.999
Occult cancer
BRCA10/32/20 (10.0)>0.999
BRCA20/31/10 (10.0)>0.999
BRCA1/20/63/30 (10.0)>0.999
Total
BRCA12/3 (66.7)6/20 (30.0)0.269
BRCA20/35/10 (50.0)0.231
BRCA1/22/6 (33.3)11/30 (36.7)>0.999

Values are presented as number (%).

Values are presented as number (%). In the pathology slides from 2010 to 2012, the presence of occult cancer was only assessed because the fallopian tube was not examined according to the SEE/FIM protocol. Occult cancer was detected in five of these 27 patients, four of the 15 BRCA1 mutation carriers (26.7%), and one of the 12 BRCA2 mutation carriers (8.3%). Of the five patients with occult cancer, one was younger than 40 at detection (14.3% of the seven patients younger than 40) and four were older than 40 (20.0% of the 20 patients older than 40). Eight occult invasive cancers were identified from 2010 to 2014, five of ovarian origin and three of tubal origin (Table 4). The pathologic type of the identified cancer was papillary serous carcinoma in six patients, mucinous adenocarcinoma in one patient, and endometrioid adenocarcinoma in one patient; one of the 13 cancer cases (7.7%) was detected in a patient younger than 40 and seven of the 50 cancer cases (14.0%) were detected in patients older than 40.
Table 4

Characteristics of the study patients with cancers detected at RRSO

No.Age at RRSO (yr)LocationHistologic typeStageCytologyBRCA1/2 statusBRCA germline mutation
134OvaryMAC, WDIANegative15199G>T
245OvaryEAC, PDIC2Negative15312+1G>C
367OvaryPSC, HGIIBPositive11835del A
441FTPSC, HGIIICPositive1509C>A
548FTPSC, HGIIBNegative11418delC
652FTPSC, HGIIICNone*12478 del G
742OvaryPSC, HGIIBNone21627A>T
863OvaryPSC, HGIVBPositive25820_5821delCA

EAC, endometrioid adenocarcinoma; FT, fallopian tube; HG, high-grade; MAC, mucinous adenocarcinoma; PD, poorly differentiated; PSC, papillary serous carcinoma; RRSO, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; WD, well differentiated.

*Cytology was not performed.

EAC, endometrioid adenocarcinoma; FT, fallopian tube; HG, high-grade; MAC, mucinous adenocarcinoma; PD, poorly differentiated; PSC, papillary serous carcinoma; RRSO, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; WD, well differentiated. *Cytology was not performed.

DISCUSSION

NCCN guidelines suggest RRSO before the age of 40 in these BRCA carriers. However, patients still tend to delay RRSO until after 40 years of age due to worries about the negative hormonal influence of bilateral oophorectomy. The dramatic and rapid decline in estrogen and androgen levels after RRSO may negatively influence quality of life and health [78]. Short-term hormone replacement treatment seems to improve quality of life and, moreover, does not seem to have an adverse effect on oncologic outcomes in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers without breast cancer history [9]. In BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer history, greater prudence is required regarding the timing of RRSO due to the impossibility of hormone replacement treatment. In current study, the median age at RRSO was 46.5 years (range, 32 to 73 years), which was higher than the recommended age of the NCCN guidelines. Only 13 patients (20.6%) underwent bilateral RRSO before 40 years of age. This result is similar to that obtained by Garcia et al. [3], who evaluated the adherence to the NCCN guidelines of RRSO by age 35 to 40 and found that only 17% women had undergone RRSO before the age of 40. In comparison between 2010 to 2012 and 2013 to 2014, the median age at RRSO (46 vs. 46.5) was not decreased against steadily increasing mean number of RRSO (9 vs. 18). In Korea, BRCA sequencing and number of revealed mutation carrier is steadily increasing by ‘Angelina Jolie effect’ and insurance policy change of BRCA test. RRSO is increasing accordingly, without tendency of delaying RRSO in BRCA mutation carriers. In current study, only one woman was nulliparous showing that most women want to undergo RRSO after childbirth, which may be one of the reasons why BRCA carriers delay RRSO, given that women tend to conceive at an older age than in previous generations [10]. Statistical analysis of factors such as tamoxifen use and family history revealed no significant relationship with the detection rate of precursor lesions or occult cancer at RRSO in the 2013 to 2014 cohort. The frequency of precursor lesions and occult cancer in the 36 patients treated from 2013 to 2014 is listed in Table 2. The primary site of all precursor cases was distal fallopian tube, supporting the value of the SEE/FIM protocol, which sections the fimbriated end at 2- to 3-mm intervals to expose about a 60% greater surface area [11]. p53 overexpression (p53 signature) is defined as strong nuclear staining in at least six consecutive tubal epithelial cells [6]. Ki-67 is a proliferation marker and its overexpression is defined by Ki-67 staining in more than 50% of nuclei of p53-overexpressing cells. These characteristics are putative precursors to STIC, which is itself a direct precursor of HGSOC. STIC shows significant atypia, p53 overexpression, and Ki-67 overexpression [12]. In our current study, the detection rate of STIC at RRSO was 5.6% (BRCA1 mutation carriers, 4.3%; BRCA2 mutation carriers, 7.7%), which is similar to the results of previous studies reporting STIC detection rates of between 5% and 8% [1314]. The detection rate of occult cancer was 12.7% (BRCA1 mutation carriers, 15.8%; BRCA2 mutation carriers, 8.0%) and this is similar to the results of previous studies, which ranged from 4.4% to 17% [151617]. The detection rate of precursor lesions or cancer at RRSO in the 2013 to 2014 cohort was 36.1% (13/36). There were no significant differences in the distribution of precursor lesions and occult cancer between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. In the analysis according to age, precursor lesions were more common in BRCA1 mutation carriers younger than 40 years old (66.7% vs. 20.0%). In BRCA2 mutation carriers, precursor lesions were only detected in those older than 40 years of age, indicating the possible faster occurrence of precursor lesions in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Occult cancer was detected in three women, all of whom were older than 40 years of age, suggesting that precursor lesions in women younger than 40 years old were progressing and being detected as occult cancer in women older than 40 years of age. However, no statistically significant relationships were found in this analysis due to the small sample size. In the analysis of pathology slides obtained in 2010 to 2012, occult cancer was detected in five patients, with a higher detection rate in BRCA1 mutation carriers than in BRCA2 mutation carriers (26.7% vs. 8.3%). Of the five patients with occult cancer, only one was younger than 40 years. Eight patients were found to have occult cancer from 2010 to 2014, and only one patient was younger than 40 (12.5%). Occult cancer was more commonly detected in women older than 40 (7.7% vs. 14.0%). The age at which RRSO provides maximal benefit with minimal adverse hormonal effects is still controversial. The efficacy of RRSO in protecting against ovarian and breast cancer has already been proven [18] and women who undergo RRSO show the same levels of fatigue, fracture incidence, and quality of life as controls [1920]. However, previous studies showed increased overall and cardiovascular disease mortality in premenopausal women who had undergone bilateral oophorectomy and had not received estrogen replacement therapy [72122]. Moreover, in a study conducted by Michelsen et al. [23], surgical menopause was significantly associated with metabolic syndrome. For this situation, a “two-step prevention strategy” was suggested in which salpingectomy or fimbriectomy with ovarian conservation would be performed in young women, followed by oophorectomy after menopause [2425]. However, this approach remains to be fully investigated. Our study had several weaknesses. We were unable to collect data on the history of contraceptive use due to the retrospective nature of our analysis. During the period of 2010 to 2012, pathologic slide reviews considered only for occult cancer because the slides were not assessed according to the SEE/FIM protocol in the fallopian tube. In addition, we were unable to find a statistically significant association between age and the detection of precursor lesions and occult cancer, probably due to the small sample size of the study. However, we analyzed the differences in the detection rate of precursor lesions and occult cancer by 40 years of age according to the NCCN guidelines. Additionally, the current analysis only comprised women with breast cancer who were unable to receive estrogen replacement therapy. The optimal timing of RRSO is more crucial for these patients who are not receiving estrogen support. And our study shows the possible earlier occurrence of precursor lesions in BRCA1 mutation carriers than BRCA2 mutation carriers. The continuous increase in BRCA testing is increasing the detection of BRCA mutation carriers, with a consequent more widespread use of RRSO. Nonetheless, women still tend to delay RRSO until after they are 40 years of age. However, as shown by our present analysis, occult invasive cancers were more commonly detected in patients older than 40 years. Our findings support the significance of bilateral RRSO by age of 40 in germline BRCA mutation carriers, although there was no significant association found between age and the detection rate of precursor lesions and occult cancer due to the small sample size. To resolve this matter, a larger and prospective study is required to determine the optimal timing of RRSO for maximal risk reduction with minimal adverse hormonal effects. A prospective study of the usefulness of the two-step prevention strategy using salpingectomy or fimbriectomy is also necessary.
  24 in total

1.  Use of risk-reducing surgeries in a prospective cohort of 1,499 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Xinglei Chai; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Peter J Hulick; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joanne L Blum; Susan M Domchek; Jinbo Chen; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Radical fimbriectomy: a reasonable temporary risk-reducing surgery for selected women with a germ line mutation of BRCA 1 or 2 genes? Rationale and preliminary development.

Authors:  Eric Leblanc; Fabrice Narducci; Isabelle Farre; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Sophie Taieb; Claude Adenis; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could expand the number of patients that benefit from poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Bryan T J Hennessy; Kirsten M Timms; Mark S Carey; Alexander Gutin; Larissa A Meyer; Darl D Flake; Victor Abkevich; Jennifer Potter; Dmitry Pruss; Pat Glenn; Yang Li; Jie Li; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Karen Smith McCune; Maurie Markman; Russell R Broaddus; Jerry S Lanchbury; Karen H Lu; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Quality of life and health status after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in women who carry a BRCA mutation: A review.

Authors:  Amy Finch; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Primary fallopian tube malignancies in BRCA-positive women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  Michael J Callahan; Christopher P Crum; Fabiola Medeiros; David W Kindelberger; Julia A Elvin; Judy E Garber; Colleen M Feltmate; Ross S Berkowitz; Michael G Muto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Precursor lesions of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: morphological and molecular characteristics.

Authors:  Amy L Gross; Robert J Kurman; Russell Vang; Ie-Ming Shih; Kala Visvanathan
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Korean ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Myong Cheol Lim; Sokbom Kang; Sang-Soo Seo; Sun-Young Kong; Bo-Yon Lee; Seon-Kyung Lee; Sang-Yoon Park
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Fatigue and quality of life after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at increased risk for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Trond M Michelsen; Anne Dørum; Claes G Tropé; Sophie D Fosså; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: primary results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial GOG-0199.

Authors:  Mark E Sherman; Marion Piedmonte; Phuong L Mai; Olga B Ioffe; Brigitte M Ronnett; Linda Van Le; Iouri Ivanov; Maria C Bell; Stephanie V Blank; Paul DiSilvestro; Chad A Hamilton; Krishnansu S Tewari; Katie Wakeley; Noah D Kauff; S Diane Yamada; Gustavo Rodriguez; Steven J Skates; David S Alberts; Joan L Walker; Lori Minasian; Karen Lu; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Mark E Robson; Johanna Lee; Judy E Garber; Claudine Isaacs; D Gareth Evans; Henry Lynch; Rosalind A Eeles; Susan L Neuhausen; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Joanne L Blum; Paul Sabbatini; Richard R Barakat; Clifford Hudis; Larry Norton; Kenneth Offit; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

1.  Clinical and pathological outcomes of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for Japanese women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hidetaka Nomura; Ai Ikki; Atsushi Fusegi; Makiko Omi; Yoichi Aoki; Sachiho Netsu; Terumi Tanigawa; Maki Matoda; Sanshiro Okamoto; Kohei Omatsu; Takeshi Nakajima; Arisa Ueki; Akiko Tonooka; Hiroyuki Kanao
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A prospective multicentric study of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation patients.

Authors:  Vera Loizzi; Ettore Cicinelli; Vittoria Del Vecchio; Francesca Arezzo; Xheni Deromemaj; Anila Kardhashi; Angelo Paradiso; Francesco Legge; Maria Iole Natalicchio; Leonardo Resta; Nicoletta Resta; Daria Carmela Loconte; Gennaro Cormio
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-08-31

3.  Clinical background and outcomes of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in Japan.

Authors:  Hidetaka Nomura; Masayuki Sekine; Shiro Yokoyama; Masami Arai; Takayuki Enomoto; Nobuhiro Takeshima; Seigo Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Cell Origins of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jaeyeon Kim; Eun Young Park; Olga Kim; Jeanne M Schilder; Donna M Coffey; Chi-Heum Cho; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  The fallopian tube as origin of ovarian cancer: Change of diagnostic and preventive strategies.

Authors:  Satoru Kyo; Noriyoshi Ishikawa; Kohei Nakamura; Kentaro Nakayama
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 6.  Recommendations for diagnosing STIC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joep M A Bogaerts; Miranda P Steenbeek; Majke H D van Bommel; Johan Bulten; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Joanne A de Hullu; Michiel Simons
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.535

Review 7.  Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  George U Eleje; Ahizechukwu C Eke; Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu; Joseph I Ikechebelu; Emmanuel O Ugwu; Onyinye O Okonkwo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-24

8.  BRCA1/2 mutations, including large genomic rearrangements, among unselected ovarian cancer patients in Korea.

Authors:  Do Hoon Kim; Chi Heum Cho; Sun Young Kwon; Nam Hee Ryoo; Dong Seok Jeon; Wonmok Lee; Jung Sook Ha
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.401

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.