Literature DB >> 31055694

Clinical background and outcomes of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in Japan.

Hidetaka Nomura1, Masayuki Sekine2, Shiro Yokoyama3, Masami Arai4, Takayuki Enomoto2, Nobuhiro Takeshima5, Seigo Nakamura3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify the clinical background and treatment outcomes of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in Japan for women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC).
METHODS: In the present retrospective observational study, we examined the Japanese HBOC Consortium's (JHC) database. This database contains 11,711 probands who received BRCA genetic testing, or their relatives, with any cancer in 2433 pedigrees. This study was supported by the registration committee of the JHC.
RESULTS: We analyzed 488 individuals diagnosed with HBOC, of which 153 (31.4%) underwent RRSO. Of the latter patients, 88 carried BRCA1 mutation (B1); 62 carried BRCA2 mutation (B2); and 3 carried both mutations. During a mean follow-up period of 2.6 years (range 0-12.6), one patient developed a primary peritoneal cancer (PPC). Clinical background comparison for individuals who underwent RRSO vs. those > 45 years of age who did not undergo RRSO revealed that significant factors were represented by B1 (p < 0.0001); child bearing (p < 0.00001); and breast cancer history (p < 0.01). However, family history of ovarian cancer and menopause status were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Over 30% HBOC's in Japan underwent RRSO. In Japan, individuals with breast cancer history and B1 generally underwent RRSO, whereas those who did not bear a child mostly avoided RRSO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; Hereditary breast and ovarian cancers; Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31055694     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01456-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  31 in total

1.  Screening for familial ovarian cancer: failure of current protocols to detect ovarian cancer at an early stage according to the international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics system.

Authors:  Diane Stirling; D Gareth R Evans; Gabriella Pichert; Andrew Shenton; Elaine N Kirk; Sylvia Rimmer; C Michael Steel; Sheila Lawson; R M Camille Busby-Earle; Jane Walker; Fiona I Lalloo; Diana M Eccles; Anneke M Lucassen; Mary E Porteous
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Survival patterns after oophorectomy in premenopausal women: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Walter A Rocca; Brandon R Grossardt; Mariza de Andrade; George D Malkasian; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound monitoring in high-risk women cannot prevent the diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R I Olivier; M A C Lubsen-Brandsma; S Verhoef; M van Beurden
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Short-term surgical outcome and safety of risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  M J A Kenkhuis; G H de Bock; P Oude Elferink; H J G Arts; J C Oosterwijk; L Jansen; M J E Mourits
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Henry T Lynch; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven A Narod; Laura Van't Veer; Judy E Garber; Gareth Evans; Claudine Isaacs; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Predictors of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy compared with gynecologic screening use in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Joanna B Madalinska; Marc van Beurden; Eveline M A Bleiker; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Lottie Lubsen-Brandsma; Leon F Massuger; Marian J E Mourits; Katja N Gaarenstroom; Eleonora B L van Dorst; Hans van der Putten; Henk Boonstra; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Mary-Claire King; Joan H Marks; Jessica B Mandell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Hereditary gynecologic cancers: differential diagnosis, surveillance, management and surgical prophylaxis.

Authors:  Karen H Lu
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Uptake and timing of bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Comfort N Ibe; James J Dignam; Shelly A Cummings; Marion Verp; Melody A White; Grazia Artioli; Laura Dudlicek; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

1.  Differences in age at diagnosis of ovarian cancer for each BRCA mutation type in Japan: optimal timing to carry out risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Masayuki Sekine; Takayuki Enomoto; Masami Arai; Hiroki Den; Hiroyuki Nomura; Takeshi Ikeuchi; Seigo Nakamura
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.756

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.