| Literature DB >> 27669205 |
Guilin Chen1,2, Xun Li3,4, Flora Saleri5,6, Mingquan Guo7,8.
Abstract
Rhamnus davurica Pall. (R. davurica) has been used as a traditional medicinal herb for many years in China and abroad. It has been well documented as a rich source of flavonoids with diversified structures, which in turn results in far-ranging biological activities, such as anti-inflammation, anticancer, antibacterial and antioxidant activities. In order to further correlate their anticancer potentials with the phytochemical components, the fingerprint profile of R. davurica herb from Dongbei was firstly investigated using HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Thirty two peaks were detected and identified, 14 of which were found in R. davurica for the first time in this work. Furthermore, a total of 23 peaks were resolved as flavonoids, which are the major components found in R. davurica. Meanwhile, the antiproliferative activities against human cancer cells of HT-29 and SGC-7901 in vitro exhibited distinct inhibitory effects with IC50 values at 24.96 ± 0.74 and 89.53 ± 4.11 μg/mL, respectively. Finally, the general toxicity against L-O2 cells displayed a much higher IC50 at 229.19 ± 8.52 μg/mL, which suggested very low or no toxicity on hepatic cell viability. The current study revealed for the first time the correlations between the flavonoids of R. davurica with their antiproliferative activities, which indicated that the fingerprint profile of flavonoids and their anticancer activities could provide valuable information on the quality control for herbal medicines and their derived natural remedies from this valuable medicinal plant.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC-ESI-MS/MS; Rhamnus davurica; antiproliferative activities; fingerprint profile; flavonoids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27669205 PMCID: PMC6273673 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21101275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The HPLC-UV chromatogram of R. davurica (Dongbei) at 360 nm using the optimized analytical method. The peak numbers in this figure correspond to those used in Table 1.
Identification and quantitative analysis of flavonoids and other compounds corresponding to the chromatographic peaks in Figure 1 by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
| Peak | Rt (min) | [M − H]− ( | MS2 ( | Identifications | Contents (mg/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.72 | 447 | 447, 357, 327, 311, 297, 285 | Orientin a | 1.43 | |
| 9.26 | 447 | 447, 357, 327, 297, 285 | Isoorientin a | 2.87 | |
| 11.20 | 431 | 431, 341, 311, 283, 269 | Vitexin a | 86.07 | |
| 12.10 | 463 | 463, 301, 300 | Isoquercitrin a | 2.76 | |
| 12.70 | 461 | 461, 299, 284 | Diosmetin 7- | 2.66 | |
| 13.27 | 447 | 447, 285, 284 | Astragaloside a | 2.19 | |
| 14.06 | 447 | 447, 327, 301, 300, 285, 270 | Luteolin 5- | 4.07 | |
| 14.32 | 1017 | 1016, 903, 790, 677, 564, 451, 338, 225 | Unknown | 2.50 | |
| 14.63 | 303 | 303, 285, 275, 241, 217, 199, 175, 151, 125 | Taxifolin b | 15.51 | |
| 15.24 | 445 | 445, 283, 268 | Physcion 8- | 3.40 | |
| 15.68 | 463 | 463, 301, 300 | Quercetin 7- | 3.08 | |
| 16.14 | 195 | 195, 167, 152, 136, 108 | Iodolactone derivative b | 4.00 | |
| 16.57 | 665 | 665, 470, 357, 338, 243 | Unknown | 2.49 | |
| 17.27 | 553 | 553, 469, 425, 355, 243 | Unknown | 1.62 | |
| 17.49 | 509 | 509, 449, 421, 359, 341, 315, 271, 239 | Unknown | 2.70 | |
| 18.55 | 287 | 287, 269, 259, 243, 215, 201, 151, 125 | Aromadendrin b | 21.48 | |
| 19.04 | 447 | 447, 285, 183, 165, 119, 93 | Kaempferol 7- | 3.70 | |
| 19.49 | 285 | 285, 267, 241, 217, 199, 175, 151, 133 | Luteolin a | 2.97 | |
| 19.87 | 301 | 301, 273, 229, 179, 151, 121, 107 | Quercetin a | 1.17 | |
| 21.33 | 169 | 169, 151, 125, 107, 83, 57 | Oxireno[4,5]cyclopenta[1,2- | 4.10 | |
| 22.28 | 269 | 269, 241, 225, 201, 181, 159, 133 | Apigenin a | 3.47 | |
| 22.64 | 285 | 285, 257, 241, 229, 213, 185, 151, 107, 93 | Kaempferol a | 11.77 | |
| 23.02 | 301 | 301, 283, 245, 227, 151, 125 | Quercetin isomer | 7.29 | |
| 23.99 | 271 | 271, 185, 151, 125, 119 | Naringenin b | 0.89 | |
| 24.81 | 301 | 301, 283, 179, 165, 135, 109 | Quercetin isomer | 0.08 | |
| 25.89 | 299 | 299, 284, 283, 256, 255, 240, 227 | Rhamnocitrin b | 1.62 | |
| 26.90 | 325 | 325, 307, 289, 271, 263, 185, 169, 137, 125 | Naringenin derivative | 0.05 | |
| 28.09 | 551 | 285, 179, 165, 119 | Sakuranetin dimer | 0.22 | |
| 29.44 | 285 | 285, 270, 243, 165, 151, 119, 93 | Sakuranetin b | 2.95 | |
| 29.88 | 283 | 285, 270, 243, 165, 151, 119, 93 | Questin b | 42.17 | |
| 30.49 | 283 | 283, 268, 267, 239, 211 | Physcion b | 24.00 | |
| 32.15 | 359 | 359, 285, 267, 241, 223 | Luteolin derivative | 0.27 |
a Identified with the corresponding standards; b identified based on the reported literature. Each individual component is expressed as mg per 100 g DW. Rt, retention time.
Figure 2The chemical structures present in R. davurica. The peak numbers in this figure correspond to those used in Table 1.
Figure 3The MS/MS spectra and proposed fragmentation pathways of representative C-glycosides of isoorientin (a) (Peak 2), orientin (b) (Peak 1) and vitexin (c) (Peak 3). The peak numbers in this figure correspond to those used in Table 1.
Liner equation, correlation coefficients, limits of detection and limits of quantification of three standards.
| Compound | Liner Equation | R2 | LOD (μg/mL) | LOQ (μg/mL) | Linear Range (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutin | 0.9992 | 0.30 | 1.0 | 1.0–333 | |
| Vitexin | 0.9991 | 0.30 | 1.0 | 1.0–333 | |
| Kaempferol | 0.9990 | 0.1 | 0.33 | 0.33–333 |
LOD = limit of detection, S/N = 3; LOQ = limit of quantitation, S/N = 10.
Figure 4The percentage compositions of different component groups (a) from R. davurica and its dose-dependent (b) and time-dependent (c) antiproliferative activities against HT-29 and SGC-7901 cells and its general toxicity on L-O2 cells (d).