Literature DB >> 34457767

More Than Their Test Scores: Redefining Success with Multiple Mini-Interviews.

Ann Blair Kennedy1, Cindy Nessim Youssef Riyad2, Laura H Gunn3,4, April Gant Brown5, Kandyce Brooke Dunlap3, Melissa Elizabeth Knutsen3, Alicia Anne Dahl3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Medical schools are shifting to a holistic approach for admissions. As non-cognitive abilities become more valued in the medical field and admissions become more competitive, multiple mini-interviews (MMI) are becoming increasingly common in selection criteria. The purpose of this article is to examine the relationship among admissions criteria to create a predictive model of acceptance to medical school. This article also aims to examine, among matriculated students, the relationship between MMI and traditional academic success, and the relationship between MMI scores and clinical competence and academic accolades.
METHODS: This longitudinal study followed a cohort of students from the MMI process through the first two pre-clinical years at a medical school in the southeastern USA. Multiple logistic regression with backward elimination variable selection was used to examine the relationship between admission criteria and acceptance. A multivariate multinomial ordered probit model was used to assess the relationship between MMI and traditional academic success among matriculated students. Simple linear regression models were used to assess relationships between MMI and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores and honors nomination.
RESULTS: MMI are among eight significant predictors of acceptance. Among matriculated students, there were weak negative associations between MMI and traditional academic success; however, all but one relationship was statistically non-significant. There was not a significant association between MMI and OSCE scores or academic accolades.
CONCLUSIONS: While MMI can identify students with non-cognitive skills needed to be a good physician, continued assessment needs to be incorporated in their education. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic Success; Admission; Cohort Studies; Logistic Models; Minority Recruitment; Schools, Medical; Testing/Assessment

Year:  2020        PMID: 34457767      PMCID: PMC8368390          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01013-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  31 in total

1.  Medical school application interview score has limited predictive validity for performance on a fourth year clinical practice examination.

Authors:  William T Basco; Carol J Lancaster; Gregory E Gilbert; Maura E Carey; Amy V Blue
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 2.  Uncertainties in the selection of applicants for medical school.

Authors:  Jochanan Benbassat; Reuben Baumal
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Emotional intelligence predicts success in medical school.

Authors:  Nele Libbrecht; Filip Lievens; Bernd Carette; Stéphane Côté
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-11-11

4.  Doctor-patient communication: a review.

Authors:  Jennifer Fong Ha; Nancy Longnecker
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

5.  How Medical School Applicant Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status Relate to Multiple Mini-Interview-Based Admissions Outcomes: Findings From One Medical School.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Tonya Fancher; Joshua J Fenton; Kevin Fiscella; Francis Sousa; Peter Franks; Mark Henderson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches.

Authors:  Mirjana Knorr; Johanna Hissbach
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Holistic review--shaping the medical profession one applicant at a time.

Authors:  Robert A Witzburg; Henry M Sondheimer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Z Di Blasi; E Harkness; E Ernst; A Georgiou; J Kleijnen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Correlation between MMI performance and OSCE performance - a pilot study.

Authors:  Adetokunbo Oluwasanjo; Thomas Wasser; Richard Alweis
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2015-06-15

10.  Reliability of Multiple Mini-Interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Mark C Henderson; Erin Griffin; Julie A Rainwater; Theodore R Hall; Carolyn J Kelly; Ellena M Peterson; David Wofsy; Peter Franks
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating a Global Assessment Measure Created by Standardized Patients for the Multiple Mini Interview in Medical School Admissions: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Ann Blair Kennedy; Cindy Nessim Youssef Riyad; Ryan Ellis; Perry R Fleming; Mallorie Gainey; Kara Templeton; Anna Nourse; Virginia Hardaway; April Brown; Pam Evans; Nabil Natafgi
Journal:  J Particip Med       Date:  2022-08-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.