Kai Lin1, Jeremy D Collins2, Varun Chowdhary2, Michael Markl2, James C Carr2. 1. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 737 N Michigan Avenue, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611, United States. Electronic address: kai-lin@northwestern.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 737 N Michigan Avenue, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the performance of HDA in characterizing left ventricular (LV) function and regional myocardial motion patterns in the context of cardiomyopathy based on cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the approval of the institutional review board (IRB), standard cine images of 45 subjects, including 15 healthy volunteers, 15 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and 15 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were retrospectively analyzed using HDA. The variations of LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV mass (LVM), and regional myocardial motion indices, including radial (Drr), circumferential (Dcc) displacement, radial (Vrr) and circumferential (Vcc) velocity, radial (Err), circumferential (Ecc) and shear (Ess) strain and radial (SRr) and circumferential (SRc) strain rate, were calculated and compared among subject groups. Inter-study reproducibility of HDA-derived myocardial motion indices were tested on 15 volunteers by using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV). RESULTS: HDA identified significant differences in cardiac function and motion indices between subject groups. DCM patients had significantly lower LVEF (33.5±9.65%), LVM (105.88±21.93g), peak Drr (0.29±0.11cm), Vrr-sys (2.14±0.72cm/s), Err (0.17±0.08), Ecc (-0.08±0.03), SRr-sys (0.91±0.44s(-1)) and SRc-sys (-0.64±0.27s(-1)) compared to the other two groups. HCM patients demonstrated increased LVM (171.69±34.19) and lower peak Vcc-dia (0.78±0.30cm/s) than other subjects. Good inter-study reproducibility was found for all HDA-derived myocardial indices in healthy volunteers (ICC=0.664-0.942, CoV=15.1%-37.1%). CONCLUSION: Without the need for operator interaction, HDA is a reproducible method for the automated characterization of global and regional LV function in the context of cardiomyopathy.
OBJECTIVE: To test the performance of HDA in characterizing left ventricular (LV) function and regional myocardial motion patterns in the context of cardiomyopathy based on cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the approval of the institutional review board (IRB), standard cine images of 45 subjects, including 15 healthy volunteers, 15 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and 15 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were retrospectively analyzed using HDA. The variations of LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV mass (LVM), and regional myocardial motion indices, including radial (Drr), circumferential (Dcc) displacement, radial (Vrr) and circumferential (Vcc) velocity, radial (Err), circumferential (Ecc) and shear (Ess) strain and radial (SRr) and circumferential (SRc) strain rate, were calculated and compared among subject groups. Inter-study reproducibility of HDA-derived myocardial motion indices were tested on 15 volunteers by using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV). RESULTS: HDA identified significant differences in cardiac function and motion indices between subject groups. DCMpatients had significantly lower LVEF (33.5±9.65%), LVM (105.88±21.93g), peak Drr (0.29±0.11cm), Vrr-sys (2.14±0.72cm/s), Err (0.17±0.08), Ecc (-0.08±0.03), SRr-sys (0.91±0.44s(-1)) and SRc-sys (-0.64±0.27s(-1)) compared to the other two groups. HCM patients demonstrated increased LVM (171.69±34.19) and lower peak Vcc-dia (0.78±0.30cm/s) than other subjects. Good inter-study reproducibility was found for all HDA-derived myocardial indices in healthy volunteers (ICC=0.664-0.942, CoV=15.1%-37.1%). CONCLUSION: Without the need for operator interaction, HDA is a reproducible method for the automated characterization of global and regional LV function in the context of cardiomyopathy.
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Xiaodong Zhong; Bruce S Spottiswoode; Craig H Meyer; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Barry J Maron; Jeffrey A Towbin; Gaetano Thiene; Charles Antzelevitch; Domenico Corrado; Donna Arnett; Arthur J Moss; Christine E Seidman; James B Young Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-03-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Steffen E Petersen; Bernd A Jung; Frank Wiesmann; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Jane M Francis; Juergen Hennig; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Kan N Hor; William M Gottliebson; Christopher Carson; Erin Wash; James Cnota; Robert Fleck; Janaka Wansapura; Piotr Klimeczek; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Eugene S Chung; D Woodrow Benson; Wojciech Mazur Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02
Authors: Kai Lin; Jeremy D Collins; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Debiao Li; Michael Markl; James C Carr Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Nikhil S Phatak; Steve A Maas; Alexander I Veress; Nathan A Pack; Edward V R Di Bella; Jeffrey A Weiss Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Kai Lin; Leng Meng; Jeremy D Collins; Varun Chowdhary; Michael Markl; James C Carr Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Eric J Keller; Shanna Fang; Kai Lin; Benjamin H Freed; Peter M Smith; Bruce S Spottiswoode; Rachel Davids; Maria Carr; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Michael Markl; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-02-26 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Kai Lin; Roberto Sarnari; Ashitha Pathrose; Daniel Z Gordon; Julie Blaisdell; Michael Markl; James C Carr Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 4.531