Literature DB >> 16424246

Myocardial tissue phase mapping with cine phase-contrast mr imaging: regional wall motion analysis in healthy volunteers.

Steffen E Petersen1, Bernd A Jung, Frank Wiesmann, Joseph B Selvanayagam, Jane M Francis, Juergen Hennig, Stefan Neubauer, Matthew D Robson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish prospectively a database of normal three-dimensional systolic and diastolic endocardial and epicardial velocity values for all myocardial segments in healthy volunteers by using cine phase-contrast velocity magnetic resonance imaging, also called tissue phase mapping (TPM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and was conducted according to principles of the Declaration of Helsinki; each subject provided informed written consent. Ninety-six healthy volunteers (57 [59%] men, 39 [41%] women; mean age, 38 years +/- 12 [standard deviation]) underwent cardiac phase-contrast imaging with a black blood segmented k-space gradient-echo sequence for the analysis of three-dimensional myocardial velocity with high spatial resolution at 1.5 T on basal, midventricular, and apical short-axis views. Eighteen consecutive volunteers were imaged twice to determine interstudy reproducibility, and intra- and interobserver variability values were analyzed. Systolic and diastolic velocity curves were analyzed for peak velocity and time to peak velocity in the radial, circumferential, and longitudinal directions, as well as for torsion rate and longitudinal strain rate. Mixed-effects models with a random intercept for volunteers were used to test differences among the three ventricular sections and the transmural, endocardial, and epicardial parameters.
RESULTS: TPM enabled reproducible assessment of myocardial velocity with small intra- and interobserver variability values. Systolic peak radial velocity was lowest at the apical level (P < .001); diastolic peak radial velocity was similar at all three myocardial levels (P = .73). As viewed from the apex, a relative counterclockwise rotation during systole was followed by a relative clockwise rotation of the apex against the base. Diastolic and systolic peak longitudinal velocity values decreased from base to apex (P < .001). A gradient between endocardium and epicardium was observed for radial velocity values, with greater endocardial velocity values (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: TPM is a reproducible comprehensive modality for assessment of regional wall motion, and intra- and interobserver variability values are low. Copyright RSNA, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16424246     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2383041992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

1.  Longitudinal myocardial peak velocities using high temporal resolution phase-contrast and simple averaging are comparable to tissue Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Christophe Meyer; Laurent Bonnemains; François Marçon; Pierre-Yves Marie; Jacques Felblinger; Pierre-André Vuissoz
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Spiral tissue phase velocity mapping in a breath-hold with non-cartesian SENSE.

Authors:  Robin Simpson; Jennifer Keegan; Peter Gatehouse; Michael Hansen; David Firmin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  SAR reduced black-blood cine TPM for increased temporal resolution at 3T.

Authors:  Anja Lutz; Axel Bornstedt; Robert Manzke; G Ulrich Nienhaus; Patrick Etyngier; Volker Rasche
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Evaluation of left ventricular function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Suchi Grover; Darryl P Leong; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Impact of age and cardiac disease on regional left and right ventricular myocardial motion in healthy controls and patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot.

Authors:  Alexander Ruh; Roberto Sarnari; Haben Berhane; Kenny Sidoryk; Kai Lin; Ryan Dolan; Arleen Li; Michael J Rose; Joshua D Robinson; James C Carr; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Segmental biventricular analysis of myocardial function using high temporal and spatial resolution tissue phase mapping.

Authors:  Marius Menza; Daniela Föll; Jürgen Hennig; Bernd Jung
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Myocardial motion analysis based on an optical flow method using tagged MR images.

Authors:  Daiki Tabata; Haruo Isoda; Kaori Kato; Hiroki Matsubara; Takafumi Kosugi; Takashi Kosugi; Masaki Terada; Atsushi Fukuyama; Yoshiaki Komori; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 8.  The emerging clinical role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andreas Kumar; David J Patton; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Heart deformation analysis for automated quantification of cardiac function and regional myocardial motion patterns: A proof of concept study in patients with cardiomyopathy and healthy subjects.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Jeremy D Collins; Varun Chowdhary; Michael Markl; James C Carr
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Magnetic resonance tissue phase mapping demonstrates altered left ventricular diastolic function in children with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Charlotte Gimpel; Bernd A Jung; Sabine Jung; Johannes Brado; Daniel Schwendinger; Barbara Burkhardt; Martin Pohl; Katja E Odening; Julia Geiger; Raoul Arnold
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.