Literature DB >> 26749328

Automated Assessment of Left Ventricular Function and Mass Using Heart Deformation Analysis: Initial Experience in 160 Older Adults.

Kai Lin1, Jeremy D Collins2, Donald M Lloyd-Jones3, Marie-Pierre Jolly4, Debiao Li2, Michael Markl2, James C Carr2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of automated quantification of left ventricular function and mass based on heart deformation analysis (HDA) in asymptomatic older adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study complied with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act regulations. Following the approval of the institutional review board, 160 asymptomatic older participants were recruited for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging including two-dimensional cine images covering the entire left ventricle in short-axis view. Data analysis included the calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular mass (LVM), and cardiac output (CO) using HDA and standard global cardiac function analysis (delineation of end-systolic and end-diastolic left ventricle epi- and endocardial borders). The agreement between methods was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV).
RESULTS: HDA had a shorter processing time than the standard method (1.5 ± 0.3 min/case vs. 5.8 ± 1.4 min/case, P < 0.001). There was good agreement for LVEF (ICC = 0.552, CoV = 10.5%), CO (ICC = 0.773, CoV = 13.5%), and LVM (ICC = 0.859, CoV = 14.5%) acquired with the standard method and HDA. There was a systemic bias toward lower LVEF (62.8% ± 8.3% vs. 69.3% ± 6.7%, P < 0.001) and CO (4.4 ± 1.0 L/min vs. 4.8 ± 1.3 L/min, P < 0.001) by HDA compared to the standard technique. Conversely, HDA overestimated LVM (114.8 ± 30.1 g vs. 100.2 ± 29.0 g, P < 0.001) as compared to the reference method.
CONCLUSIONS: HDA has the potential to measure LVEF, CO, and LVM without the need for user interaction based on standard cardiac two-dimensional cine images.
Copyright © 2015 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart deformation analysis; MRI; left ventricular function; mass

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26749328      PMCID: PMC4768796          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  13 in total

1.  Transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiography: in vivo determination of left ventricular mass in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H P Kühl; A Bücker; A Franke; S Maul; C Nolte-Ernsting; T Reineke; R Hoffmann; R W Günther; P Hanrath
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation.

Authors:  Thomas Schlosser; Konstantin Pagonidis; Christoph U Herborn; Peter Hunold; Kai-Uwe Waltering; Thomas C Lauenstein; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Quantification of left ventricular mass using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with echocardiography in domestic cats.

Authors:  Kristin A MacDonald; Mark D Kittleson; Tracy Reed; Richard Larson; Philip Kass; Erik R Wisner
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.363

4.  Discrepancies in Left Ventricular Mass Calculation Based on Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Measurements in Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Hee-Young Seo; Seung-Pyo Lee; Jun-Bean Park; Joo Myung Lee; Eun-Ah Park; Sung-A Chang; Hyung-Kwan Kim; Sung-Ji Park; Whal Lee; Yong-Jin Kim; Sang-Chol Lee; Seung Woo Park; Dae-Won Sohn; Yeon Hyeon Choe
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Comparison of techniques for the measurement of left ventricular function following cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Nicholas G Bellenger; Neil J Marcus; Kim Rajappan; Magdi Yacoub; Nicholas R Banner; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  4D-CT lung motion estimation with deformable registration: quantification of motion nonlinearity and hysteresis.

Authors:  Vlad Boldea; Gregory C Sharp; Steve B Jiang; David Sarrut
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Strain measurement in the left ventricle during systole with deformable image registration.

Authors:  Nikhil S Phatak; Steve A Maas; Alexander I Veress; Nathan A Pack; Edward V R Di Bella; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient.

Authors:  P B Bottini; A A Carr; L M Prisant; F W Flickinger; J D Allison; J S Gottdiener
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP.

Authors:  Damian J Tyler; Lucy E Hudsmith; Steffen E Petersen; Jane M Francis; Peter Weale; Stefan Neubauer; Kieran Clarke; Matthew D Robson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress.

Authors:  Andreas Schuster; Shelby Kutty; Asif Padiyath; Victoria Parish; Paul Gribben; David A Danford; Marcus R Makowski; Boris Bigalke; Philipp Beerbaum; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  11 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Heart deformation analysis: the distribution of regional myocardial motion patterns at left ventricle.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Leng Meng; Jeremy D Collins; Varun Chowdhary; Michael Markl; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  The consistency of myocardial strain derived from heart deformation analysis.

Authors:  Eric J Keller; Shanna Fang; Kai Lin; Benjamin H Freed; Peter M Smith; Bruce S Spottiswoode; Rachel Davids; Maria Carr; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Michael Markl; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Heart deformation analysis for automated quantification of cardiac function and regional myocardial motion patterns: A proof of concept study in patients with cardiomyopathy and healthy subjects.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Jeremy D Collins; Varun Chowdhary; Michael Markl; James C Carr
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Reproducibility of cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) in human subjects.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Leng Meng; Jeremy D Collins; Varun Chowdhary; Michael Markl; James C Carr
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Heart deformation analysis: measuring regional myocardial velocity with MR imaging.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Jeremy D Collins; Varun Chowdhary; Michael Markl; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Cine MRI characterizes HFpEF and HFrEF in post-capillary pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Roberto Sarnari; Ashitha Pathrose; Daniel Z Gordon; Julie Blaisdell; Michael Markl; James C Carr
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.531

8.  Distribution pattern of left-ventricular myocardial strain analyzed by a cine MRI based deformation registration algorithm in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Dan Yang; Ke Wan; Yong Luo; Jia-Yu Sun; Tian-Jing Zhang; Wei-Hao Li; Andreas Greiser; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Qing Zhang; Yu-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Fully-automated left ventricular mass and volume MRI analysis in the UK Biobank population cohort: evaluation of initial results.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; Mihir M Sanghvi; Nay Aung; Jose Miguel Paiva; Filip Zemrak; Kenneth Fung; Elena Lukaschuk; Aaron M Lee; Valentina Carapella; Young Jin Kim; Jane Francis; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer; Andreas Greiser; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Carmel Hayes; Alistair A Young; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Left ventricular myocardial deformation: a study on diastolic function in the Chinese male population and its relationship with fat distribution.

Authors:  Lan Zhu; Shengjia Gu; Qingrou Wang; Xiaoyue Zhou; Simin Wang; Caixia Fu; Wenjie Yang; Jens Wetzl; Fuhua Yan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.