Literature DB >> 27664215

A longitudinal study investigating the role of decisional conflicts and regret and short-term psychological adjustment after IVF treatment failure.

Celia Hoi Yan Chan1, Hi Po Bobo Lau2, Michelle Yi Jun Tam2, Ernest Hung Yu Ng3.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What is the relationship between decisional conflict, decisional regret and psychological well-being in women following unsuccessful IVF cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: The mediating effect of decisional regret on the relationship between decisional conflict and fertility-related quality of life (FRQOL) has been found to be moderated by the availability (versus absence) of frozen embryos after an unsuccessful IVF cycle. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Infertility treatment is marked by its open-ended nature. Stresses in treatment decision-making could be aggravated by a culture which honours families through procreation. While studies have investigated treatment-related decision-making among infertile women, little is known about the mental health consequences of decisional conflict and decisional regret following an unsuccessful IVF cycle. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A study was conducted over a 3-month period with infertile women who had recently experienced a failed IVF cycle (T0). Decisional conflict when they decided on terminating or continuing treatment (T1) and decisional regret 3 months later (T2) were measured. Participants reported their levels of depression, anxiety and FRQOL at three time points. A total of 151 participants completed all time points (attrition rate: 39%). The average age of participants was 37.2 years, and they had had 1.1 cycles (range: 0-8) on average at the time of study intake. The duration of the study was 2 years. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Participants were infertile women who were not pregnant following an IVF cycle recruited from a university-affiliated assisted reproduction centre. Following the notification of a negative pregnancy result, patients were invited to complete measures of FRQOL, depression and anxiety across three time points and decisional conflict and decisional regret at T1 and T2 respectively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Decisional regret partially mediated the effect of decisional conflict on overall and treatment-specific FRQOL (P < 0.05). The mediation by decisional regret was present only among participants who had no remaining frozen embryos after their unsuccessful IVF cycle (P < 0.05). LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: Self-selection bias at recruitment remains a concern. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Our results show for the first time how mental health implications of decisional conflict may vary among patients with different clinical characteristics (i.e. availability of frozen embryos), despite their common experience of an unsuccessful IVF cycle. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the psychological ramifications of treatment decision-making difficulties, as well as individual differences in adjustment to unsuccessful treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was funded by the Hong Kong University Grant Council-General Research Fund (HKU740613) and the authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: HKU Clinical Trials Registry (Trial registration number: HKUCTR-1680).
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; assisted reproductive technology; decisional conflicts; decisional regret; psychological well-being; quality of life; treatment decision-making; treatment failure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27664215     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

1.  Assisted reproductive technology treatments and quality of life: a longitudinal study among subfertile women and men.

Authors:  Francesca Agostini; Fiorella Monti; Federica Andrei; Marcella Paterlini; Stefano Palomba; Giovanni Battista La Sala
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Depression, anxiety and stress in women with breech pregnancy compared to women with cephalic presentation-a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Madeleine Schauer; Elisabetta Latartara; Maria Alonso-Espias; Emma Rossetti; Pimrapat Gebert; Wolfgang Henrich; Larry Hinkson
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Perceptions of Fertility Physicians Treating Women Undergoing IVF Using an Egg Donation.

Authors:  Reut Ben-Kimhy; Orit Taubman-Ben-Ari
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Assessing the practice of LuPOR for poor responders: a prospective study evaluating follicular fluid cfDNA levels during natural IVF cycles.

Authors:  Sfakianoudis Konstantinos; Tsioulou Petroula; Maziotis Evangelos; Giannelou Polina; Glava Argyro; Grigoriadis Sokratis; Rapani Anna; Nezos Andrianos; Pantou Agni; Koutsilieris Michael; Pantos Konstantinos; Mastorakos George; Simopoulou Mara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Patient identified factors influencing decisions to seek fertility care: adaptation of a wellness model.

Authors:  Kelsey Whittier Olerich; Karen Summers; Adam M Lewis; Kathleen Stewart; Ginny L Ryan
Journal:  J Reprod Infant Psychol       Date:  2019-12-20

6.  Influence of a patient education and care program on women undergoing non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatment.

Authors:  Akiko Mori; Osamu Nishii; Yasushi Takai; Mikio Momoeda; Etsuko Kamisawa; Kiyomi Shimizu; Mieko Nozawa; Yuri Takemura; Akihisa Fujimoto
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-08-10

7.  Association Between MitoScore, BMI, and Body Fat Percentage as a Predictive Marker for the Outcome of In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

Authors:  Himanshu Arora; Ineabelle Collazo; Juergen Eisermann; Nicholas Hendon; Manish Kuchakulla; Kajal Khodamoradi; Joginder Bidhan; Alexandra Dullea; Isaac Zucker; Zahra Khosravizadeh; Parth Shah; Maria Bustillo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-27

8.  Investigating related factors to psychological symptoms of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatment.

Authors:  Mahshid Abdishahshahani; Marjan Torabi; Ashraf Kazemi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2020-01-30

9.  Satisfaction with Fertility Preservation Decisions among Adolescent Males with Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Charleen I Theroux; Kylie N Hill; Anna L Olsavsky; James L Klosky; Nicholas D Yeager; Anthony Audino; Sarah H O'Brien; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.