Literature DB >> 27663714

Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia with a minimum follow-up of 2 years: an international multicenter study.

Saowanee Ngamruengphong1, Haruhiro Inoue2, Philip Wai-Yan Chiu3, Hon Chi Yip3, Amol Bapaye4, Michael Ujiki5, Lava Patel5, Pankaj N Desai6, Bu Hayee7, Amyn Haji7, Vivien Wai-Yin Wong3, Silvana Perretta8, Shivangi Dorwat4, Mathieu Pioche9, Sabine Roman10, Jérôme Rivory9, François Mion10, Thierry Ponchon9, Aurélien Garros10, Jun Nakamura2, Yoshitaka Hata2, Valerio Balassone2, Manabu Onimaru2, Gulara Hajiyeva1, Amr Ismail1, Yen-I Chen1, Majidah Bukhari1, Yamile Haito-Chavez1, Vivek Kumbhari1, Roberta Maselli11, Alessandro Repici11, Mouen A Khashab1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown promising safety and efficacy in short-term studies. However, long-term follow-up data are very limited. The aims of this study were to assess (1) clinical outcome of patients with a minimum post-POEM follow-up of 2 years and (2) factors associated with long-term clinical failure after POEM.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed that included all consecutive patients with achalasia who underwent POEM with a minimum follow-up of 2 years at 10 tertiary-care centers. Clinical response was defined by a decrease in Eckardt score to 3 or lower.
RESULTS: A total of 205 patients (45.8% men; mean age, 49 years) were followed for a median of 31 months (interquartile range, 26-38 months). Of these, 81 patients (39.5%) had received previous treatment for achalasia before POEM. Clinical success was achieved in 98% (185/189), 98% (142/144), and 91% (187/205) of patients with follow-up within 6 months, at 12 months, and ≥24 months, respectively. Of 185 patients with clinical response at 6 months, 11 (6%) experienced recurrent symptoms at 2 years. History of previous pneumatic dilation was associated with long-term treatment failure (odds ratio, 3.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-9.23). Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 8.2% of patients and only 1 patient required surgical intervention. Abnormal esophageal acid exposure and reflux esophagitis were documented in 37.5% and 18% of patients, respectively. However, these rates are simply a reference number among a very selective group of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: POEM is safe and provides high initial clinical success and excellent long-term outcomes. Among patients with confirmed clinical response within 6 months, 6% had recurrent symptoms by 2 years.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27663714     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  21 in total

1.  Recent Advances in Third-Space Endoscopy.

Authors:  Zaheer Nabi; D Nageshwar Reddy; Mohan Ramchandani
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-04

2.  Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Management of Esophageal Disorders.

Authors:  Ian S Grimm
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-07

3.  Endoluminal vs. extraluminal cardiomyotomy for oesophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Giovanni Zaninotto; Sheraz Markar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Endoscopic Treatment of Subepithelial Lesions of the Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Vivien Wai Yin Wong; Osamu Goto; Hans Gregersen; Philip Wai Yan Chiu
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12

5.  Long-Term Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Patients with Achalasia: Outcomes with a Median Follow-Up of 36 Months.

Authors:  Chenghai He; Meng Li; Bin Lu; Xiao Ying; Chen Gao; Shuangshuang Wang; Chengao Ma; Chaoqiong Jin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  POEM in the Treatment of Esophageal Disorders.

Authors:  Nasim Parsa; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03

7.  [Surgical treatment of achalasia - endoscopic or laparoscopic? : Proposal for a tailored approach].

Authors:  B H A von Rahden; J Filser; M Al-Nasser; C-T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): mid-term efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Jan Martinek; Hana Svecova; Zuzana Vackova; Radek Dolezel; Ondrej Ngo; Jana Krajciova; Eva Kieslichova; Radim Janousek; Alexander Pazdro; Tomas Harustiak; Lucie Zdrhova; Pavla Loudova; Petr Stirand; Julius Spicak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Endoscopy versus radiology in post-procedural monitoring after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Authors:  Jan Friso Nast; Christoph Berliner; Thomas Rösch; Daniel von Renteln; Tania Noder; Guido Schachschal; Stefan Groth; Harald Ittrich; Jan F Kersten; Gerhard Adam; Yuki B Werner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Clinical Practice Update: The Use of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia: Expert Review and Best Practice Advice From the AGA Institute.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; David Katzka; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.