Literature DB >> 29546671

Endoscopy versus radiology in post-procedural monitoring after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Jan Friso Nast1, Christoph Berliner2, Thomas Rösch3,4, Daniel von Renteln5,6, Tania Noder5, Guido Schachschal5, Stefan Groth5, Harald Ittrich2, Jan F Kersten7, Gerhard Adam2, Yuki B Werner5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The newly developed technique of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been shown to be effective in several short- and mid-term studies. Limited information is available about the adequacy of immediate post-POEM monitoring tests.
METHODS: POEM was performed under general anesthesia in 228 patients (59.6% male, mean age 45.6 ± 15.5 years). Post-procedural checks comprised clinical and laboratory examination, and, during post-procedure days 1-5, endoscopy and-in the first 114 cases-radiologic examination using water-soluble contrast (1st group); the remaining patients underwent post-procedure controls without radiology (2nd group). Main outcome was value of endoscopic compared to radiologic control for recognition of early adverse events.
RESULTS: In the first group, routine fluoroscopic contrast swallow suggested minor leakages at the mucosal entry site in two cases which was confirmed endoscopically in only one. Endoscopy revealed two minor entry site leakages and, in six additional cases, dislocated clips without leakage (overall 5.3%). All eight patients underwent reclipping and healed without clinical sequelae. In the 2nd group, endoscopy showed 5 clip dislocations (all reclipped) and one ischemic cardiac perforation in a patient with clinical deterioration on post-POEM day 1 who had to undergo surgery after confirmation of leakage by CT.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiologic monitoring (contrast swallow) after POEM is not useful and can be omitted. Even routine endoscopic monitoring for detection and closure of minor defects of the mucosal entry site yields limited information with regards to final outcome; major complications are very rare and probably associated with clinical deterioration. Clinical Trials Gov Registration number of the main study: NCT01405417.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achalasia; Complications; Peroral endoscopic myotomy; Post-procedure follow-up

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29546671     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6137-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  Detection of pharyngeal perforation: comparison of aqueous and barium-containing contrast agents.

Authors:  M Keberle; G Wittenberg; A Trusen; F Hoppe; D Hahn
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; T Rösch; P Fockens
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Authors:  Yuki B Werner; Guido Costamagna; Lee L Swanström; Daniel von Renteln; Pietro Familiari; Ahmed M Sharata; Tania Noder; Guido Schachschal; Jan F Kersten; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniel Von Renteln; Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Paul Fockens; Peter Bauerfeind; Melina C Vassiliou; Yuki B Werner; Gerald Fried; Wolfram Breithaupt; Henriette Heinrich; Albert J Bredenoord; Jan F Kersten; Tessa Verlaan; Michael Trevisonno; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Evaluation of the need for routine esophagram after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Authors:  Rym El Khoury; Ezra N Teitelbaum; Joel M Sternbach; Nathaniel J Soper; Carla B Harmath; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Peroral esophageal myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for achalasia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingtian Wei; Tinghan Yang; Xuyang Yang; Ziqiang Wang; Zongguang Zhou
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 7.  Is POEM the Answer for Management of Spastic Esophageal Disorders? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Khan; Vivek Kumbhari; Saowanee Ngamruengphong; Amr Ismail; Yen-I Chen; Yamile Haito Chavez; Majidah Bukhari; Richard Nollan; Mohammad Kashif Ismail; Manabu Onimaru; Valerio Balassone; Ahmed Sharata; Lee Swanstrom; Haruhiro Inoue; Alessandro Repici; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Esophageal perforation: comparison of use of aqueous and barium-containing contrast media.

Authors:  A Buecker; B B Wein; J M Neuerburg; R W Guenther
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Versus Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Daniel J Luckett; Jason Fine; Nicholas J Shaheen; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia: A Meta-Analysis of Nonrandomized Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Hongjuan Wang; Xingdong Chen; Lan Liu; Hongbo Wang; Bin Liu; Jianqiang Guo; Hongying Jia
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.