Literature DB >> 28799005

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): mid-term efficacy and safety.

Jan Martinek1,2,3, Hana Svecova4, Zuzana Vackova4, Radek Dolezel5, Ondrej Ngo6, Jana Krajciova4, Eva Kieslichova7, Radim Janousek8, Alexander Pazdro9, Tomas Harustiak9, Lucie Zdrhova10, Pavla Loudova11, Petr Stirand4, Julius Spicak4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is becoming a standard treatment for achalasia. Long-term efficacy and the rate of post-POEM reflux should be further investigated. The main aim of this study was to analyze safety and mid-term (12 and 24 months) clinical outcomes of POEM.
METHODS: Data on single tertiary center procedures were collected prospectively. The primary outcome was treatment success defined as an Eckardt score < 3 at 12 and 24 months. A total of 155 consecutive patients with achalasia underwent POEM; 133 patients were included into the analysis (22 patients will be analyzed separately as part of a multicenter randomized clinical trial).
RESULTS: POEM was successfully completed in 132 (99.2%) patients, and the mean length of the procedure was 69.8 min (range 31-136). One patient underwent a drainage for pleural effusion; no other serious adverse events occurred. Treatment success at 3, 12, and 24 months was observed in 95.5% (CI 89.6-98.1), 93.4% (86.5-96.8), and 84.0% (71.4-91.4) of patients, respectively. A total of 11 patients (8.3%) reported initial treatment failure (n = 5) or later recurrence (n = 6). The majority of relapses occurred in patients with achalasia type I (16.7 vs. 1.1% achalasia type II vs. 0% achalasia type III; p<0.05). At 12 months, post-POEM reflux symptoms were present in 29.7% of patients. At 3 months, mild reflux esophagitis was diagnosed in 37.6% of patients, and pathological gastroesophageal reflux was detected in 41.5% of patients. A total of 37.8% of patients had been treated with a proton pump inhibitor.
CONCLUSION: POEM resulted in greater than 90% treatment success at 12 months which tends to decrease to 84% after 2 years. More than one-third of the patients had mild reflux symptoms and/or mild esophagitis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achalasia; Gastroesophageal reflux; Per-oral endoscopic myotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28799005     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5807-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Outcomes of the First 100 Patients With Short-term Follow-up.

Authors:  Pietro Familiari; Giovanni Gigante; Michele Marchese; Ivo Boskoski; Andrea Tringali; Vincenzo Perri; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Authors:  Yuki B Werner; Guido Costamagna; Lee L Swanström; Daniel von Renteln; Pietro Familiari; Ahmed M Sharata; Tania Noder; Guido Schachschal; Jan F Kersten; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  H Inoue; H Minami; Y Kobayashi; Y Sato; M Kaga; M Suzuki; H Satodate; N Odaka; H Itoh; S Kudo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniel Von Renteln; Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Paul Fockens; Peter Bauerfeind; Melina C Vassiliou; Yuki B Werner; Gerald Fried; Wolfram Breithaupt; Henriette Heinrich; Albert J Bredenoord; Jan F Kersten; Tessa Verlaan; Michael Trevisonno; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary.

Authors:  Stavros N Stavropoulos; David J Desilets; Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Christopher J Gostout; Gregory Haber; Haruhiro Inoue; Michael L Kochman; Rani Modayil; Thomas Savides; Daniel J Scott; Lee L Swanstrom; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Akintoye; Nitin Kumar; Itegbemie Obaitan; Quazim A Alayo; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  The light at the end of the tunnel: a single-operator learning curve analysis for per oral endoscopic myotomy.

Authors:  Kumkum Sarkar Patel; Rose Calixte; Rani J Modayil; David Friedel; Collin E Brathwaite; Stavros N Stavropoulos
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy: A Series of 500 Patients.

Authors:  Haruhiro Inoue; Hiroki Sato; Haruo Ikeda; Manabu Onimaru; Chiaki Sato; Hitomi Minami; Hiroshi Yokomichi; Yasutoshi Kobayashi; Kevin L Grimes; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes one year after peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia.

Authors:  Ezra N Teitelbaum; Nathaniel J Soper; Byron F Santos; Fahd O Arafat; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Ikuo Hirano; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Ashwin Kurian; Christy M Dunst; Ahmed Sharata; Neil Bhayani; Erwin Rieder
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell; Stavros Nicholas Stavropoulos; David Friedel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Use of a report card to evaluate outcomes of achalasia surgery: beyond the Eckardt score.

Authors:  Ealaf Shemmeri; Ralph W Aye; Alexander S Farivar; Adam J Bograd; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Long-Term Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Patients with Achalasia: Outcomes with a Median Follow-Up of 36 Months.

Authors:  Chenghai He; Meng Li; Bin Lu; Xiao Ying; Chen Gao; Shuangshuang Wang; Chengao Ma; Chaoqiong Jin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Myotomy length informed by high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) results in improved per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) outcomes for type III achalasia.

Authors:  Erica D Kane; Vikram Budhraja; David J Desilets; John R Romanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Periprocedural safety profile of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)-a retrospective analysis of adverse events according to two different classifications.

Authors:  Dagmar Simkova; Jan Mares; Zuzana Vackova; Tomas Hucl; Petr Stirand; Eva Kieslichova; Ondrej Ryska; Julius Spicak; Sylvia Drazilova; Eduard Veseliny; Jan Martinek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs pneumatic dilation (PD) in treatment of achalasia: A meta-analysis of studies with ≥ 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew Ofosu; Babu P Mohan; Yervant Ichkhanian; Maen Masadeh; John Febin; Mohamed Barakat; Daryl Ramai; Saurabh Chandan; Gulara Haiyeva; Shahab R Khan; Mohamad Aghaie Meybodi; Antonio Facciorusso; Alessandro Repici; Sachin Wani; Nirav Thosani; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-06-21

7.  Outcome of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia cardia: Experience with a new triangular knife.

Authors:  Zaheer Nabi; Mohan Ramchandani; Radhika Chavan; Rakesh Kalapala; Santosh Darisetty; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.