Sven Mensing1, Doerthe Eckert1, Shringi Sharma2,3, Akshanth R Polepally2, Amit Khatri2, Thomas J Podsadecki4, Walid M Awni2, Rajeev M Menon2, Sandeep Dutta2. 1. Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co., KG, Knollstrasse 50, 67061, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany. 2. Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Dept. R4PK, Bldg. AP31-3, AbbVie, Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, CA, 94404, USA. 4. Virology, R48U, AP-30, AbbVie, Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of the current study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of a triple direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen (3D) (ombitasvir, paritaprevir-ritonavir and dasabuvir) and adjunctive ribavirin, and estimate covariate effects in a broad spectrum of subjects with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data from six phase III studies and one phase II study in subjects receiving the currently approved doses of the 3D ± ribavirin regimen for treating HCV genotype 1 infection for 12 weeks or 24 weeks were characterized using separate population pharmacokinetic models, built using each component of the regimen from nonlinear mixed-effects methodology in NONMEM 7.3. In the models, demographic and clinical covariates were tested. Models were assessed via goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks and bootstrap evaluations. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetic models for each component of the 3D ± ribavirin regimen (DAAs and ritonavir, n = 2348) and ribavirin (n = 1841) adequately described their respective plasma concentration-time data. Model parameter estimates were precise and robust, and all models showed good predictive ability. Significant covariate effects associated with apparent clearance and volume of distribution included age, body weight, gender, cirrhosis, HCV subtype, opioid or antidiabetic agent use, and creatinine clearance. CONCLUSION: The population pharmacokinetics of the 3D ± ribavirin regimen components in HCV-infected patients were characterized using phase II and III HCV clinical trial data. Although several statistically significant covariates were identified, their effects were modest and not clinically meaningful to necessitate dose adjustments for any component of the 3D regimen.
AIM: The aim of the current study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of a triple direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen (3D) (ombitasvir, paritaprevir-ritonavir and dasabuvir) and adjunctive ribavirin, and estimate covariate effects in a broad spectrum of subjects with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data from six phase III studies and one phase II study in subjects receiving the currently approved doses of the 3D ± ribavirin regimen for treating HCV genotype 1 infection for 12 weeks or 24 weeks were characterized using separate population pharmacokinetic models, built using each component of the regimen from nonlinear mixed-effects methodology in NONMEM 7.3. In the models, demographic and clinical covariates were tested. Models were assessed via goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks and bootstrap evaluations. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetic models for each component of the 3D ± ribavirin regimen (DAAs and ritonavir, n = 2348) and ribavirin (n = 1841) adequately described their respective plasma concentration-time data. Model parameter estimates were precise and robust, and all models showed good predictive ability. Significant covariate effects associated with apparent clearance and volume of distribution included age, body weight, gender, cirrhosis, HCV subtype, opioid or antidiabetic agent use, and creatinine clearance. CONCLUSION: The population pharmacokinetics of the 3D ± ribavirin regimen components in HCV-infectedpatients were characterized using phase II and III HCV clinical trial data. Although several statistically significant covariates were identified, their effects were modest and not clinically meaningful to necessitate dose adjustments for any component of the 3D regimen.
Authors: Fred Poordad; Jean-Pierre Bronowicki; Stuart C Gordon; Stefan Zeuzem; Ira M Jacobson; Mark S Sulkowski; Thierry Poynard; Timothy R Morgan; Cliona Molony; Lisa D Pedicone; Heather L Sings; Margaret H Burroughs; Vilma Sniukiene; Navdeep Boparai; Venkata S Goteti; Clifford A Brass; Janice K Albrecht; Bruce R Bacon Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Jane P Messina; Isla Humphreys; Abraham Flaxman; Anthony Brown; Graham S Cooke; Oliver G Pybus; Eleanor Barnes Journal: Hepatology Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Akshanth R Polepally; Jennifer R King; Bifeng Ding; Diana L Shuster; Emily O Dumas; Amit Khatri; Yi-Lin Chiu; Thomas J Podsadecki; Rajeev M Menon Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Akshanth R Polepally; Haoyu Wang; Patrick J Marroum; Mukul Minocha; Balakrishna Hosmane; Amit Khatri; Sven Mensing; Thomas J Podsadecki; Daniel E Cohen; Walid M Awni; Rajeev M Menon Journal: AAPS J Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 4.009