Literature DB >> 27659455

PET/MR: Yet another Tesla?

Markus Schwaiger1, Karl Kunze2, Christoph Rischpler2, Stephan G Nekolla2.   

Abstract

After the successful introduction of PET/CT as a multimodality imaging technique, PET/MR has subsequently emerged as an attractive instrumentation for applications in neurology, oncology, and cardiology. Simultaneous data acquisition combining structural, functional, and molecular imaging provides a unique platform to link various aspects of cardiac performance for the non-invasive characterization of cardiovascular disease phenotypes. Specifically, tissue characterization by MR techniques with and without contrast agents allows for functional parameters such as LGE, myocardial perfusion, and T1 maps as well as an estimate of extracellular volume. PET tracers excel by their high sensitivity and specificity, thus supplementing the functional tissue characterization by MRI. Although the clinical applications are yet to be validated , the first experience with PET/MR suggests future applications in the area of vascular imaging (unstable plaque) as well as in the characterization of inflammatory processes involving the heart. Ischemic heart disease can be comprehensively assessed by integrating regional function, perfusion, and viability. Future technical improvements leading to less costly PET/MR instrumentation are necessary to support routine clinical application of this promising technique in cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG; MRI; PET; myocardial infarction; myocardial perfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27659455     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-016-0665-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  57 in total

Review 1.  Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: estimating perfusion and capillary permeability.

Authors:  S P Sourbron; D L Buckley
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The discovery of X-rays.

Authors:  G Farmelo
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.142

3.  Myocardial blood flow at rest and stress measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of a distributed parameter model with a Fermi function model.

Authors:  David A Broadbent; John D Biglands; Abdulghani Larghat; Steven P Sourbron; Aleksandra Radjenovic; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein; David L Buckley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Tissue mean transit time from dynamic computed tomography by a simple deconvolution technique.

Authors:  L Axel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Quantification of coronary flow reserve in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and its association with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Maulik D Majmudar; Venkatesh L Murthy; Ravi V Shah; Swathy Kolli; Negareh Mousavi; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Ron Blankstein; Sharmila Dorbala; Arkadiusz Sitek; Lynne W Stevenson; Mandeep R Mehra; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Do implanted pacemaker leads and ICD leads cause metal-related artifact in cardiac PET/CT?

Authors:  Frank P DiFilippo; Richard C Brunken
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Radionuclide Tracers for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Blood Flow Quantification.

Authors:  Robert A deKemp; Jennifer M Renaud; Ran Klein; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.213

8.  MR-relaxometry of myocardial tissue: significant elevation of T1 and T2 relaxation times in cardiac amyloidosis.

Authors:  Waldemar Hosch; Michael Bock; Martin Libicher; Sebastian Ley; Ute Hegenbart; Thomas J Dengler; Hugo A Katus; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Günter W Kauffmann; Arnt V Kristen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  T1 mapping in dilated cardiomyopathy with cardiac magnetic resonance: quantification of diffuse myocardial fibrosis and comparison with endomyocardial biopsy.

Authors:  Fabian aus dem Siepen; Sebastian J Buss; Daniel Messroghli; Florian Andre; Dirk Lossnitzer; Sebastian Seitz; Marius Keller; Philipp A Schnabel; Evangelos Giannitsis; Grigorios Korosoglou; Hugo A Katus; Henning Steen
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Geraint Morton; Amedeo Chiribiri; Masaki Ishida; Shazia T Hussain; Andreas Schuster; Andreas Indermuehle; Divaka Perera; Juhani Knuuti; Stacey Baker; Erik Hedström; Paul Schleyer; Michael O'Doherty; Sally Barrington; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular PET/MR: We need evidence, not hype.

Authors:  Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Hybrid imaging and publishing.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2017. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Multimodal imaging of bacterial-host interface in mice and piglets with Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

Authors:  Peter Panizzi; Marvin Krohn-Grimberghe; Edmund Keliher; Yu-Xiang Ye; Jana Grune; Vanessa Frodermann; Yuan Sun; Charlotte G Muse; Kaitlyn Bushey; Yoshiko Iwamoto; Mandy M T van Leent; Anu Meerwaldt; Yohana C Toner; Jazz Munitz; Alexander Maier; Georgios Soultanidis; Claudia Calcagno; Carlos Pérez-Medina; Giuseppe Carlucci; Kay P Riddell; Sharron Barney; Glenn Horne; Brian Anderson; Ashoka Maddur-Appajaiah; Ingrid M Verhamme; Paul E Bock; Gregory R Wojtkiewicz; Gabriel Courties; Filip K Swirski; William R Church; Paul H Walz; D Michael Tillson; Willem J M Mulder; Matthias Nahrendorf
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance: extracellular volume, native T1 and 18F-FDG PET/CMR imaging in patients after revascularized myocardial infarction and association with markers of myocardial damage and systemic inflammation.

Authors:  Karl P Kunze; Ralf J Dirschinger; Hans Kossmann; Franziska Hanus; Tareq Ibrahim; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Markus Schwaiger; Christoph Rischpler; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Imaging Biomarkers in Translational Small Animal Models.

Authors:  Pablo Aguiar; Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro; Filippo Galli; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Respiratory- and cardiac motion-corrected simultaneous whole-heart PET and dual phase coronary MR angiography.

Authors:  Camila Munoz; Radhouene Neji; Karl P Kunze; Stephan G Nekolla; Rene M Botnar; Claudia Prieto
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Motion-corrected whole-heart PET-MR for the simultaneous visualisation of coronary artery integrity and myocardial viability: an initial clinical validation.

Authors:  Camila Munoz; Karl P Kunze; Radhouene Neji; Teresa Vitadello; Christoph Rischpler; René M Botnar; Stephan G Nekolla; Claudia Prieto
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 9.236

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.