Literature DB >> 33498569

Socioeconomic Status, Health and Lifestyle Settings as Psychosocial Risk Factors for Road Crashes in Young People: Assessing the Colombian Case.

Andrea Serge1, Johana Quiroz Montoya2, Francisco Alonso1, Luis Montoro3.   

Abstract

The social determinants of health influence both psychosocial risks and protective factors, especially in high-demanding contexts, such as the mobility of drivers and non-drivers. Recent evidence suggests that exploring socioeconomic status (SES), health and lifestyle-related factors might contribute to a better understanding of road traffic crashes (RTCs). Thus, the aim of this study was to construct indices for the assessment of crash rates and mobility patterns among young Colombians who live in the central region of the country. The specific objectives were developing SES, health and lifestyle indices, and assessing the self-reported RTCs and mobility features depending on these indices. A sample of 561 subjects participated in this cross-sectional study. Through a reduction approach of Principal Component Analysis (PCA), three indices were constructed. Mean and frequency differences were contrasted for the self-reported mobility, crash rates, age, and gender. As a result, SES, health and lifestyle indices explained between 56.3-67.9% of the total variance. Drivers and pedestrians who suffered crashes had higher SES. A healthier lifestyle is associated with cycling, but also with suffering more bike crashes; drivers and those reporting traffic crashes have shown greater psychosocial and lifestyle-related risk factors. Regarding gender differences, men are more likely to engage in road activities, as well as to suffer more RTCs. On the other hand, women present lower healthy lifestyle-related indices and a less active implication in mobility. Protective factors such as a high SES and a healthier lifestyle are associated with RTCs suffered by young Colombian road users. Given the differences found in this regard, a gender perspective for understanding RTCs and mobility is highly suggestible, considering that socio-economic gaps seem to differentially affect mobility and crash-related patterns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; public health; socioeconomic status; traffic safety

Year:  2021        PMID: 33498569      PMCID: PMC7908603          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  71 in total

1.  Pedestrians' perceptions of walkability and safety in relation to the built environment in Cali, Colombia, 2009-10.

Authors:  Andrés Villaveces; Luis Alfonso Nieto; Delia Ortega; José Fernando Ríos; John Jairo Medina; María Isabel Gutiérrez; Daniel Rodríguez
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Social capital and self-rated health in Colombia: the good, the bad and the ugly.

Authors:  David Hurtado; Ichiro Kawachi; John Sudarsky
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health 2002-2010: a time-series analysis of 34 countries participating in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study.

Authors:  Frank J Elgar; Timo-Kolja Pförtner; Irene Moor; Bart De Clercq; Gonneke W J M Stevens; Candace Currie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Accident history, risk perception and traffic safe behaviour.

Authors:  Robert Ngueutsa; Dongo Rémi Kouabenan
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1).

Authors:  Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Psychiatric Disorders Are Associated with an Increased Risk of Injuries: Data from the Iranian Mental Health Survey (IranMHS).

Authors:  Behrang Shadloo; Abbas Motevalian; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili; Vandad Sharifi; Ahmad Hajebi; Reza Radgoodarzi; Mitra Hefazi; Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Drivers for successful long-term lifestyle change, the role of e-health: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Carl Joakim Brandt; Jane Clemensen; Jesper Bo Nielsen; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  What is in an index? Construction method, data metric, and weighting scheme determine the outcome of composite social vulnerability indices in New York City.

Authors:  Diana Reckien
Journal:  Reg Environ Change       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.678

9.  Gender differences and socioeconomic status in relation to overweight among older Korean people.

Authors:  Jin-Won Noh; Minkyung Jo; Taewook Huh; Jooyoung Cheon; Young Dae Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Principal component-based weighted indices and a framework to evaluate indices: Results from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 1996 to 2011.

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Chao; Chao-Jung Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Predictive Utility of Composite Child Feeding Indices (CCFIs) for Child Nutritional Status: Comparative Analyses for the Most Suitable Formula for Constructing an Optimum CCFI.

Authors:  Stephen Kofi Anin; Richard Stephen Ansong; Florian Fischer; Alexander Kraemer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.