Literature DB >> 27655817

Inference for the difference in the area under the ROC curve derived from nested binary regression models.

Glenn Heller, Venkatraman E Seshan, Chaya S Moskowitz, Mithat Gönen.   

Abstract

The area under the curve (AUC) statistic is a common measure of model performance in a binary regression model. Nested models are used to ascertain whether the AUC statistic increases when new factors enter the model. The regression coefficient estimates used in the AUC statistics are computed using the maximum rank correlation methodology. Typically, inference for the difference in AUC statistics from nested models is derived under asymptotic normality. In this work, it is demonstrated that the asymptotic normality is true only when at least one of the new factors is associated with the binary outcome. When none of the new factors are associated with the binary outcome, the asymptotic distribution for the difference in AUC statistics is a linear combination of chi-square random variables. Further, when at least one new factor is associated with the outcome and the population difference is small, a variance stabilizing reparameterization improves the asymptotic normality of the AUC difference statistic. A confidence interval using this reparameterization is developed and simulations are generated to determine their coverage properties. The derived confidence interval provides information on the magnitude of the added value of new factors and enables investigators to weigh the size of the improvement against potential costs associated with the new factors. A pancreatic cancer data example is used to illustrate this approach.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; Confidence interval; Incremental value; Maximum rank correlation; Nested models; Risk classification model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27655817      PMCID: PMC5965312          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.279


  11 in total

1.  Combining multiple markers for classification using ROC.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comparing ROC curves derived from regression models.

Authors:  Venkatraman E Seshan; Mithat Gönen; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Testing for improvement in prediction model performance.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Kathleen F Kerr; Gary Longton; Zheyu Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Two criteria for evaluating risk prediction models.

Authors:  R M Pfeiffer; M H Gail
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Predicting dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: development of a preoperative nomogram.

Authors:  Camilo Correa-Gallego; Richard Do; Jennifer Lafemina; Mithat Gonen; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; T Peter Kingham; Murray F Brennan; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Extensions of criteria for evaluating risk prediction models for public health applications.

Authors:  Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Colin B Begg
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI model selection for predicting tumor aggressiveness in papillary thyroid cancers.

Authors:  Ramesh Paudyal; Yonggang Lu; Vaios Hatzoglou; Andre Moreira; Hilda E Stambuk; Jung Hun Oh; Kristen M Cunanan; David Aramburu Nunez; Yousef Mazaheri; Mithat Gonen; Alan Ho; James A Fagin; Richard J Wong; Ashok Shaha; R Michael Tuttle; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Prioritized concordance index for hierarchical survival outcomes.

Authors:  Li C Cheung; Qing Pan; Noorie Hyun; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-04-07       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The added value of new covariates to the brier score in cox survival models.

Authors:  Glenn Heller
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Comprehensive analysis of lncRNA biomarkers in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma by lncRNA-mediated ceRNA network.

Authors:  Ke Gong; Ting Xie; Yong Luo; Hui Guo; Jinlan Chen; Zhiping Tan; Yifeng Yang; Li Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Semi-quantitative visual assessment of chest radiography is associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Stefanie E Mason; Paul B Dieffenbach; Joshua A Englert; Angela A Rogers; Anthony F Massaro; Laura E Fredenburgh; Angelica Higuera; Mayra Pinilla-Vera; Marta Vilas; Raul San Jose Estepar; George R Washko; Rebecca M Baron; Samuel Y Ash
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2019-10-12

6.  Assessment of Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis to Explore Key Pathways and Novel Biomarkers in Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Xu; Yuehan Hao; Jiao Wu; Jing Zhao; Shuang Xiong
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-13

7.  Identification of Novel Key Genes and Pathways in Multiple Sclerosis Based on Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis and Long Noncoding RNA-Associated Competing Endogenous RNA Network.

Authors:  Yuehan Hao; Miao He; Yu Fu; Chenyang Zhao; Shuang Xiong; Xiaoxue Xu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Improvement of APACHE II score system for disease severity based on XGBoost algorithm.

Authors:  Yan Luo; Zhiyu Wang; Cong Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.