Literature DB >> 31680360

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI model selection for predicting tumor aggressiveness in papillary thyroid cancers.

Ramesh Paudyal1, Yonggang Lu2, Vaios Hatzoglou3, Andre Moreira4, Hilda E Stambuk3, Jung Hun Oh1, Kristen M Cunanan5, David Aramburu Nunez1, Yousef Mazaheri1,2, Mithat Gonen5, Alan Ho6, James A Fagin6, Richard J Wong7, Ashok Shaha7, R Michael Tuttle6, Amita Shukla-Dave1,3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal tracer kinetic model from T1 -weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) data and evaluate whether parameters estimated from the optimal model predict tumor aggressiveness determined from histopathology in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) prior to surgery. In this prospective study, 18 PTC patients underwent pretreatment DCE-MRI on a 3 T MR scanner prior to thyroidectomy. This study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent was obtained from all patients. The two-compartment exchange model, compartmental tissue uptake model, extended Tofts model (ETM) and standard Tofts model were compared on a voxel-wise basis to determine the optimal model using the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) for PTC. The optimal model is the one with the lowest AICc. Statistical analysis included paired and unpaired t-tests and a one-way analysis of variance. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated from the optimal model parameters to differentiate PTC with and without aggressive features, and AUCs were compared. ETM performed best with the lowest AICc and the highest Akaike weight (0.44) among the four models. ETM was preferred in 44% of all 3419 voxels. The ETM estimates of Ktrans in PTCs with the aggressive feature extrathyroidal extension (ETE) were significantly higher than those without ETE (0.78 ± 0.29 vs. 0.34 ± 0.18 min-1 , P = 0.005). From ROC analysis, cut-off values of Ktrans , ve and vp , which discriminated between PTCs with and without ETE, were determined at 0.45 min-1 , 0.28 and 0.014 respectively. The sensitivities and specificities were 86 and 82% (Ktrans ), 71 and 82% (ve ), and 86 and 55% (vp ), respectively. Their respective AUCs were 0.90, 0.71 and 0.71. We conclude that ETM Ktrans has shown potential to classify tumors with and without aggressive ETE in patients with PTC.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Akaike information criterion; aggressiveness; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; papillary thyroid cancer; perfusion; permeability; tracer kinetic model

Year:  2019        PMID: 31680360      PMCID: PMC7687051          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  49 in total

1.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state.

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni; Brian K Rutt; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Pharmacokinetic analysis of tissue microcirculation using nested models: multimodel inference and parameter identifiability.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Stefan Zwick; Fabian Kiessling; Jürgen Griebel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness by Use of the Combination of Quantitative DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Yousef Mazaheri; Ömer Aras; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Stephanie B Donaldson; Catharine M L West; Susan E Davidson; Bernadette M Carrington; Gillian Hutchison; Andrew P Jones; Steven P Sourbron; David L Buckley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  An expanded view of risk-group definition in differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  B Cady; R Rossi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of thyroid and parathyroid masses.

Authors:  H Nakahara; S Noguchi; N Murakami; S Tamura; S Jinnouchi; T Kodama; O N Adjei; S Nagamachi; T Ohnishi; S Futami; L G Flores; K Watanabe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease.

Authors:  E Henderson; B K Rutt; T Y Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Predicting outcome in papillary thyroid carcinoma: development of a reliable prognostic scoring system in a cohort of 1779 patients surgically treated at one institution during 1940 through 1989.

Authors:  I D Hay; E J Bergstralh; J R Goellner; J R Ebersold; C S Grant
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Are complex DCE-MRI models supported by clinical data?

Authors:  Chong Duan; Jesper F Kallehauge; G Larry Bretthorst; Kari Tanderup; Joseph J H Ackerman; Joel R Garbow
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Thyroid Lobectomy Is Associated with Excellent Clinical Outcomes in Properly Selected Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients with Primary Tumors Greater Than 1 cm.

Authors:  Fernanda Vaisman; Denise Momesso; Daniel A Bulzico; Cencita H C N Pessoa; Manuel Domingos Gonçalves da Cruz; Fernando Dias; Rossana Corbo; Mario Vaisman; R Michael Tuttle
Journal:  J Thyroid Res       Date:  2013-12-23
View more
  5 in total

1.  Diffusion and Perfusion MRI Predicts Response Preceding and Shortly After Radiosurgery to Brain Metastases: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Akash Deelip Shah; Amaresha Shridhar Konar; Ramesh Paudyal; Jung Hun Oh; Eve LoCastro; David Aramburu Nuñez; Nathaniel Swinburne; Behroze Vachha; Gary A Ulaner; Robert J Young; Andrei I Holodny; Kathryn Beal; Amita Shukla-Dave; Vaios Hatzoglou
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Computational Modeling of Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Velocity in Head and Neck Cancer Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Feasibility Analysis.

Authors:  Eve LoCastro; Ramesh Paudyal; Yousef Mazaheri; Vaios Hatzoglou; Jung Hun Oh; Yonggang Lu; Amaresha Shridhar Konar; Kira Vom Eigen; Alan Ho; James R Ewing; Nancy Lee; Joseph O Deasy; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06

3.  Diffusion-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Derived Imaging Metrics for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Richard Kinh Do; Marsha Reyngold; Ramesh Paudyal; Jung Hun Oh; Amaresha Shridhar Konar; Eve LoCastro; Karyn A Goodman; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06

4.  Nongaussian Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted and Fast Exchange Regime Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-MRI of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Preliminary Study for Predicting Locoregional Failure.

Authors:  Ramesh Paudyal; Linda Chen; Jung Hun Oh; Kaveh Zakeri; Vaios Hatzoglou; C Jillian Tsai; Nancy Lee; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging quantification of leukemia-induced changes in bone marrow vascular function.

Authors:  Ana L Gomes; John Gribben; Bernard Siow; Diana Passaro; Dominique Bonnet
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 9.941

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.