Literature DB >> 33089436

The added value of new covariates to the brier score in cox survival models.

Glenn Heller1.   

Abstract

Calibration is an important measure of the predictive accuracy for a prognostic risk model. A widely used measure of calibration when the outcome is survival time is the expected Brier score. In this paper, methodology is developed to accurately estimate the difference in expected Brier scores derived from nested survival models and to compute an accompanying variance estimate of this difference. The methodology is applicable to time invariant and time-varying coefficient Cox survival models. The nested survival model approach is often applied to the scenario where the full model consists of conventional and new covariates and the subset model contains the conventional covariates alone. A complicating factor in the methodologic development is that the Cox model specification cannot, in general, be simultaneously satisfied for nested models. The problem has been resolved by projecting the properly specified full survival model onto the lower dimensional space of conventional markers alone. Simulations are performed to examine the method's finite sample properties and a prostate cancer data set is used to illustrate its application.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brier score; Nested models; Projection theory; Proper score

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33089436      PMCID: PMC7855634          DOI: 10.1007/s10985-020-09509-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  10 in total

1.  Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data.

Authors:  E Graf; C Schmoor; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999 Sep 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Explained variation and predictive accuracy in general parametric statistical models: the role of model misspecification.

Authors:  Susanne Rosthøj; Niels Keiding
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Efron-type measures of prediction error for survival analysis.

Authors:  Thomas A Gerds; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Estimation of prediction error for survival models.

Authors:  Jerald F Lawless; Yan Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Measures of explained variation for survival data.

Authors:  E L Korn; R Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Tests of calibration and goodness-of-fit in the survival setting.

Authors:  Olga V Demler; Nina P Paynter; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A log-rank test for equivalence of two survivor functions.

Authors:  S Wellek
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Testing for improvement in prediction model performance.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Kathleen F Kerr; Gary Longton; Zheyu Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Orteronel plus prednisone in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ELM-PC 4): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Fred Saad; Karim Fizazi; Viorel Jinga; Eleni Efstathiou; Peter C Fong; Lowell L Hart; Robert Jones; Raymond McDermott; Manfred Wirth; Kazuhiro Suzuki; David B MacLean; Ling Wang; Hideyuki Akaza; Joel Nelson; Howard I Scher; Robert Dreicer; Iain J Webb; Ronald de Wit
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Inference for the difference in the area under the ROC curve derived from nested binary regression models.

Authors:  Glenn Heller; Venkatraman E Seshan; Chaya S Moskowitz; Mithat Gönen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.