Literature DB >> 34376299

Dynamic Filtering of Adherent and Non-adherent Microbubble Signals Using Singular Value Thresholding and Normalized Singular Spectrum Area Techniques.

Elizabeth B Herbst1, Alexander L Klibanov2, John A Hossack1, F William Mauldin3.   

Abstract

Ultrasound molecular imaging techniques rely on the separation and identification of three types of signals: static tissue, adherent microbubbles and non-adherent microbubbles. In this study, the image filtering techniques of singular value thresholding (SVT) and normalized singular spectrum area (NSSA) were combined to isolate and identify vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-targeted microbubbles in a mouse hindlimb tumor model (n = 24). By use of a Verasonics Vantage 256 imaging system with an L12-5 transducer, a custom-programmed pulse inversion sequence employing synthetic aperture virtual source element imaging was used to collect contrast images of mouse tumors perfused with microbubbles. SVT was used to suppress static tissue signals by 9.6 dB while retaining adherent and non-adherent microbubble signals. NSSA was used to classify microbubble signals as adherent or non-adherent with high accuracy (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [ROC AUC] = 0.97), matching the classification performance of differential targeted enhancement. The combined SVT + NSSA filtering method also outperformed differential targeted enhancement in differentiating MB signals from all other signals (ROC AUC = 0.89) without necessitating destruction of the contrast agent. The results from this study indicate that SVT and NSSA can be used to automatically segment and classify contrast signals. This filtering method with potential real-time capability could be used in future diagnostic settings to improve workflow and speed the clinical uptake of ultrasound molecular imaging techniques.
Copyright © 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microbubbles; Normalized singular spectrum area; Singular value thresholding; Ultrasound molecular imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34376299      PMCID: PMC8691388          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  46 in total

1.  Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging.

Authors:  Claudia Errico; Juliette Pierre; Sophie Pezet; Yann Desailly; Zsolt Lenkei; Olivier Couture; Mickael Tanter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  The Use of Acoustic Radiation Force Decorrelation-Weighted Pulse Inversion for Enhanced Ultrasound Contrast Imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Herbst; Sunil Unnikrishnan; Shiying Wang; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack; Frank William Mauldin
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-specific microbubbles for molecular ultrasound detection of prostate cancer in a rat model.

Authors:  Thomas Fischer; Anke Thomas; Isabell Tardy; Michel Schneider; Hana Hünigen; Pia Custodis; Dirk Beyersdorff; Johanna Plendl; Jörg Schnorr; Felix Diekmann; Ole Gemeinhardt
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Ultrasound assessment of inflammation and renal tissue injury with microbubbles targeted to P-selectin.

Authors:  J R Lindner; J Song; J Christiansen; A L Klibanov; F Xu; K Ley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Earlier detection of breast cancer with ultrasound molecular imaging in a transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  Sunitha V Bachawal; Kristin C Jensen; Amelie M Lutz; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Francois Tranquart; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Relationship between retention of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-targeted ultrasonographic contrast agent and the level of VEGFR2 expression in an in vivo breast cancer model.

Authors:  Debbie J Lee; Andrej Lyshchik; Jessica Huamani; Dennis E Hallahan; Arthur C Fleischer
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Shear forces from flow are responsible for a distinct statistical signature of adherent microbubbles in large vessels.

Authors:  Shiying Wang; F William Mauldin; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.488

9.  Dual-targeted contrast agent for US assessment of tumor angiogenesis in vivo.

Authors:  Jürgen K Willmann; Amelie M Lutz; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Manishkumar R Patel; Pauline Chu; Jarrett Rosenberg; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Nonlinear propagation of ultrasound through microbubble contrast agents and implications for imaging.

Authors:  Meng-Xing Tang; Robert J Eckersley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  1 in total

1.  COVID-19 CT image denoising algorithm based on adaptive threshold and optimized weighted median filter.

Authors:  Shuli Guo; Guowei Wang; Lina Han; Xiaowei Song; Wentao Yang
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.076

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.