| Literature DB >> 27654406 |
J Alan Wolfe1, S Chris Malaisrie, R Saeid Farivar, Junaid H Khan, W Clark Hargrove, Michael G Moront, William H Ryan, Gorav Ailawadi, Arvind K Agnihotri, Brian W Hummel, Trevor M Fayers, Eugene A Grossi, T Sloane Guy, Eric J Lehr, John R Mehall, Douglas A Murphy, Evelio Rodriguez, Arash Salemi, Romualdo J Segurola, Richard J Shemin, J Michael Smith, Robert L Smith, Paul W Weldner, Clifton T P Lewis, Glenn R Barnhart, Scott M Goldman.
Abstract
Techniques for minimally invasive mitral valve repair and replacement continue to evolve. This expert opinion, the second of a 3-part series, outlines current best practices for nonrobotic, minimally invasive mitral valve procedures, and for postoperative care after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27654406 PMCID: PMC5051532 DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Innovations (Phila) ISSN: 1556-9845
FIGURE 1Lower hemisternotomy incision.
FIGURE 2Lower hemisternotomy showing placement of retractor and cannulae.
FIGURE 3Patient positioning for direct-vision right minithoracotomy, showing a small pillow placed inferior to the scapula (transparent ellipse). The vertical dashed line indicates the placement of the primary incision.
FIGURE 4Exteriorization of sutures for diaphragmatic retraction.
FIGURE 5Incisions for working port and retractor. The red dot represents the location of the incision for the retractor.
FIGURE 6Retraction of the interatrial septum.
FIGURE 7Endoscopic visualization of the MV.
FIGURE 8Endoaortic occlusion balloon positioning. A, Correct balloon position. B, Proximal migration may allow leakage around the balloon and possible iatrogenic puncture. C, Distal migration may diminish brachiocephalic perfusion. Note the tip of the venous cannula 2 to 3 cm above the junction of the right atrium and superior vena cava.