Literature DB >> 34566301

Evaluation of Factors Affecting Margin Positivity and Persistent Disease After Leep for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Anila Tresa Alukal1, P Rema1, S Suchetha1, Dhanya Dinesh1, Aleyamma Mathew2, K M Jagathnath Krishna2, Thara Somanathan3, J Sivaranjith4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is the precursor lesion of cervical cancer. Untreated high-grade CIN significantly increases the risk of developing invasive cancer. Conization is the main treatment. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is the most common conization method used. The study aims to assess the risk factors associated with positive margin and persistent disease after LEEP for CIN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 156 patients who underwent LEEP during 2011-2018 included in the study. We analyzed the socio-demographic characteristics, colposcopy details, dimensions of LEEP specimen (thickness, length, volume) and histopathology (margin positivity, grade). Persistent disease was histologically confirmed by repeat LEEP and hysterectomy.
RESULTS: Margin positivity was noted in 33.3% (52) patients. Residual disease was noted in 26.2% (41) of the patients who had undergone a repeat LEEP or hysterectomy. There was a significant association between margin positivity and Swede score of 5 or more, a high-grade lesion on IFCPC score, inner margin involvement, LEEP done in a single pass. The cutoff for margin positivity was length of 0.513 cm and thickness of 0.35 cm. A significant association between residual disease and margin positivity, postmenopausal status, Swede score of 5 or more, high-grade lesion on IFCPC score, inner margin involvement was observed. The chance of residual disease was less if the cone specimen had minimum length of 0.775 cm and minimum thickness of 0.65 cm.
CONCLUSION: When in doubt regarding the margins, it is always better to perform multiple passes for lesions with a high Swede score with an initial smear of HSIL. Postmenopausal women with inner margin positivity have a high chance of residual disease and should be either kept on close follow-up or consider a repeat procedure. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2021.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34566301      PMCID: PMC8418567          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-021-01450-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  17 in total

1.  Predictors of recurrence in high-grade cervical lesions and a plan of management.

Authors:  P Leguevaque; S Motton; A Decharme; M Soulé-Tholy; G Escourrou; J Hoff
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  The value of frozen sectioning for the evaluation of resection margins in cases of conization.

Authors:  Nadereh Behtash; Mojgan Karimi Zarchi; Bahareh Hamedi; Farid Azmoode Ardalan; Afsaneh Tehranian
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Ali Baloglu; Dilek Uysal; Incim Bezircioglu; Merve Bicer; Ayşegul Inci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  POSITIVE MARGINS IN COLD KNIFE CONE: PREVALENCE AND RESIDUAL LESIONS: IGCS-0073 Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  R V Almeida; M P Salcedo; D Gottlieb; D P Todeschini; S A Pessini
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy.

Authors:  Jacob Bornstein; James Bentley; Peter Bösze; Frank Girardi; Hope Haefner; Michael Menton; Myriam Perrotta; Walter Prendiville; Peter Russell; Mario Sideri; Björn Strander; Silvio Tatti; Aureli Torne; Patrick Walker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?

Authors:  Yasin Durmuş; Alper Karalök; Derman Başaran; Mustafa Onur Kamani; Nurettin Boran; Sevgi Koç; Ahmet Taner Turan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 7.  Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Charles W E Redman; Freija Verdoodt; Maria Kyrgiou; Menelaos Tzafetas; Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Simon Leeson; Christine Bergeron; Pekka Nieminen; Jean Gondry; Olaf Reich; Esther L Moss
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Cervical cone measurements and residual disease in LLETZ conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papoutsis; Alexandros Rodolakis; Angeliki Antonakou; Michael Sindos; Spiridon Mesogitis; Maria Sotiropoulou; Gerasimos Sakellaropoulos; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Conization of the uterine cervix: does the level of gynecologist's training predict margin status?

Authors:  Daniela Ulrich; Karl Tamussino; Edgar Petru; Josef Haas; Olaf Reich
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.762

10.  Conization Using an Electrosurgical Knife for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Microinvasive Carcinoma.

Authors:  Libing Xiang; Jiajia Li; Wentao Yang; Xiaoli Xu; Xiaohua Wu; Huaying Wang; Ziting Li; Huijuan Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.