Literature DB >> 27651569

Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson's Ten-group Classification.

Rayshang G Yadav1, Nandita Maitra1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To examine Cesarean delivery rates based on the Robson's Ten-group classification system (TGCS), over a 10-year period.
METHODS: All Vaginal Deliveries and cesarean sections (CSs) performed over a 10-year period from 2004 to 2013 were included in the analysis. The data were compiled according to Robson's TGCS of cesarean section for every year. Risk Ratios (crude RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals for delivery by cesarean section were calculated for each Robson's group.
RESULTS: The TGCS was easily applied in this large dataset of 40,086 deliveries. The 10-year overall cesarean section rate (CSR) was 25.17 %. Groups 1 and 3 represented 60 % of the total obstetric population. The largest contributions to the total CSR are group 1 (37.62 %) and group 5 (17.06 %). Group 3 which was the second largest group contributed 15 % to the overall CSR. Group 2 and group 4 had high group CSRs of 47.28 and 34.74 % respectively, although the total group size was small (n = 1375;3.43 %). Maternal age and presentation were found to have an independent association with mode of delivery on logistic regression.
CONCLUSION: The Ten-group classification helped to identify the main groups of subjects who contribute most to the overall CSR. It also helped to identify subgroups requiring closer monitoring for more in-depth analyses of the indications for caesarean section. It is important to focus on the first four TGCS groups which constitute about 75 % of all deliveries. It is in the low-risk groups that one is likely to find the highest and most inappropriate indications for cesarean sections.

Keywords:  Caesarean section; Robson; Ten group classification

Year:  2015        PMID: 27651569      PMCID: PMC5016390          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-015-0738-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  14 in total

1.  Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?

Authors:  M S Robson
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 2.  Stillbirth rates: delivering estimates in 190 countries.

Authors:  Cynthia Stanton; Joy E Lawn; Hafiz Rahman; Katarzyna Wilczynska-Ketende; Kenneth Hill
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The relationship of intrapartum and antepartum stillbirth rates to measures of obstetric care in developed and developing countries.

Authors:  Robert L Goldenberg; Elizabeth M McClure; Carla M Bann
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate.

Authors:  B P Sachs; C Kobelin; M A Castro; F Frigoletto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Appropriate technology for birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Lisbet S Lundsberg; Kathleen Belanger; Christian M Pettker; Edmund F Funai; Jessica L Illuzzi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Donal J Brennan; Michael S Robson; Martina Murphy; Colm O'Herlihy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: a panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania.

Authors:  Helena Litorp; Hussein L Kidanto; Lennarth Nystrom; Elisabeth Darj; Birgitta Essén
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betran; Joao Paulo Souza; Mariana Widmer; Tomas Allen; Metin Gulmezoglu; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Trends, Regional Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Births in India, 2010-2016.

Authors:  Christophe Z Guilmoto; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Monitoring caesarean births using the Robson ten group classification system: A cross-sectional survey of private for-profit facilities in urban Bangladesh.

Authors:  Tahmina Begum; Herfina Nababan; Aminur Rahman; Md Rajibul Islam; Alayne Adams; Iqbal Anwar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Robson's Group 2 Criteria among Total Caesarean Sections in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Pratigyan Gautam; Chanda Karki; Asmita Adhikari
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 0.556

4.  Caesarean section rates analysed using Robson's 10-Group Classification System: a cross-sectional study at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abdella Amano Abdo; Sven Gudmund Hinderaker; Achamyelesh Gebretsadik Tekle; Bernt Lindtjørn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.