| Literature DB >> 27649619 |
Y Zhou1,2,3, L Duvaux4, G Ren1, L Zhang1, O Savolainen2,5, J Liu1.
Abstract
Genetic variation shared between closely related species may be due to retention of ancestral polymorphisms because of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and/or introgression following secondary contact. It is challenging to distinguish ILS and introgression because they generate similar patterns of shared genetic diversity, but this is nonetheless essential for inferring accurately the history of species with overlapping distributions. To address this issue, we sequenced 33 independent intron loci across the genome of two closely related pine species (Pinus massoniana Lamb. and Pinus hwangshanensis Hisa) from Southeast China. Population structure analyses revealed that the species showed slightly more admixture in parapatric populations than in allopatric populations. Levels of interspecific differentiation were lower in parapatry than in allopatry. Approximate Bayesian computation suggested that the most likely speciation scenario explaining this pattern was a long period of isolation followed by a secondary contact. Ecological niche modeling suggested that a gradual range expansion of P. hwangshanensis during the Pleistocene climatic oscillations could have been the cause of the overlap. Our study therefore suggests that secondary introgression, rather than ILS, explains most of the shared nuclear genomic variation between these two species and demonstrates the complementarity of population genetics and ecological niche modeling in understanding gene flow history. Finally, we discuss the importance of contrasting results from markers with different dynamics of migration, namely nuclear, chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27649619 PMCID: PMC5315522 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.72
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heredity (Edinb) ISSN: 0018-067X Impact factor: 3.821
Figure 1(a) Ranges and sampled populations for P. massoniana and P. hwangshanensis. (b) Speciation models tested in the ABC analysis.
Figure 2Population structure and admixture in parapatric and allopatric populations of the two species (STRUCTURE results).
Results of ABC model selection
| PP | 0 | 0.2066 | 0.0003 | 0.7932 |
Abbreviations: ABC, approximate Bayesian computation; F, there is continuous gene flow; FI, gene flow ceases at time Tm; I, isolation model; IF, gene flow starts at time Tm; PP, posterior probability.
Parameters estimates and 90% higher probability density (HPD) intervals under the IF (secondary contact) models, with times in generations (generation of 20 years)
| 79 737 | 86 639 | 48 712 | 143 850 | |
| 253 189 | 253 281 | 167 302 | 351 044 | |
| 352 588 | 393 784 | 69 280 | 801 875 | |
| 4.31E−06 | 5.92E−06 | 1.65E−06 | 1.53E−05 | |
| 2 | 0.871 | 1.008 | 0.367 | 2.26 |
| 1.80E−06 | 2.95E−06 | 6.26E−07 | 9.76E−06 | |
| 2 | 1.015 | 1.452 | 0.34 | 4.339 |
| 45 985 | 79 159 | 6630 | 369 906 | |
| 591 605 | 1 033 626 | 202 235 | 2 315 909 | |
| ( | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
N and 2Nm parameters are expressed as number of individuals and m are migration rates. Population 1 and 2 refers to P. massoniana and P. hwangshanensis, respectively. Abbreviation: IF, gene flow starts at time Tm.
Figure 3Species distribution modeling for P. massoniana (a, c and e) and P. hwangshanensis (b, d and f) from the last inter-glacial to present. The different colors represent the probabilities of occurrence of the species.