Literature DB >> 24993536

Predictors of pain experienced by women during percutaneous imaging-guided breast biopsies.

Adrianne E Soo1, Rebecca A Shelby2, Lauren S Miller3, Melissa Hayes Balmadrid4, Karen S Johnson5, Anava A Wren2, Sora C Yoon5, Francis J Keefe2, Mary Scott Soo6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate pain experienced during imaging-guided core-needle breast biopsies and to identify factors that predict increased pain perception during procedures.
METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol, 136 women undergoing stereotactically or ultrasound-guided breast biopsy or cyst aspiration were recruited and provided written informed consent. Participants filled out questionnaires assessing anticipated biopsy pain, ongoing breast pain, pain experienced during biopsy, catastrophic thoughts about pain during biopsy, anxiety, perceived communication with the radiologist, chronic life stress, and demographic and medical information. Procedure type, experience level of the radiologist performing the biopsy, number of biopsies, breast density, histology, and tumor size were recorded for each patient. Data were analyzed using Spearman's ρ correlations and a probit regression model.
RESULTS: No pain (0 out of 10) was reported by 39.7% of women, mild pain (1-3 out of 10) by 48.5%, and moderate to severe pain (≥4 out of 10) by 11.8% (n = 16). Significant (P < .05) predictors of greater biopsy pain in the probit regression model included younger age, greater prebiopsy breast pain, higher anticipated biopsy pain, and undergoing a stereotactic procedure. Anticipated biopsy pain correlated most strongly with biopsy pain (β = .27, P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients report minimal pain during imaging-guided biopsy procedures. Women experiencing greater pain levels tended to report higher anticipated pain before the procedure. Communication with patients before biopsy regarding minimal average pain reported during biopsy and encouragement to make use of coping strategies may reduce patient anxiety and anticipated pain.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging-guided breast biopsy; anticipated pain; breast pain

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993536     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

Review 1.  Microcalcification on mammography: approaches to interpretation and biopsy.

Authors:  Louise Wilkinson; Val Thomas; Nisha Sharma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  An evaluation of patient experience during percutaneous breast biopsy.

Authors:  Jean M Seely; Fraser Hill; Susan Peddle; Jackie Lau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of Real-world Data for Breast-MRI BI-RADS IV Lesions.

Authors:  Jens Hachenberg; Christian Eichler; Lena Steinkasserer; Wolfram Malter; Fabinshy Thangarajah; Mathias Warm; Axel Gossmann; Markus Brod; Caroline Pahmeyer
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  The relationship between holding back from communicating about breast concerns and anxiety in the year following breast biopsy.

Authors:  Caroline S Dorfman; Eneka Lamb; Alyssa Van Denburg; Anava A Wren; Mary Scott Soo; Kaylee Faircloth; Vicky Gandhi; Rebecca A Shelby
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11

5.  Research Lumbar Punctures among African Americans and Caucasians: Perception Predicts Experience.

Authors:  Jennifer C Howell; Monica W Parker; Kelly D Watts; Alexander Kollhoff; Dobromira Z Tsvetkova; William T Hu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Ulrich Bick; Rubina M Trimboli; Alexandra Athanasiou; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A T Baltzer; Maria Bernathova; Krisztina Borbély; Boris Brkljacic; Luca A Carbonaro; Paola Clauser; Enrico Cassano; Catherine Colin; Gul Esen; Andrew Evans; Eva M Fallenberg; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Michel Herranz; Karen Kinkel; Fleur Kilburn-Toppin; Christiane K Kuhl; Mihai Lesaru; Marc B I Lobbes; Ritse M Mann; Laura Martincich; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker; Simone Schiaffino; Tamar Sella; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Anne Tardivon; Chantal Van Ongeval; Matthew G Wallis; Sophia Zackrisson; Gabor Forrai; Julia Camps Herrero; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-05

7.  Feasibility study using multifocal Doppler twinkling artifacts to detect suspicious microcalcifications in ex vivo specimens of breast cancer on US.

Authors:  Vivian Youngjean Park; Jinbum Kang; Kanghee Han; Ilseob Song; Kang-Sik Kim; Se Jin Nam; Ga Ram Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon; Won Seuk Jang; Yangmo Yoo; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.