Literature DB >> 27647674

Peri-procedural silent cerebral infarcts after left atrial appendage occlusion.

M Laible1, M Möhlenbruch2, S Horstmann1, J Pfaff2, N A Geis3, S Pleger3, S Schüler4, T Rizos1, M Bendszus2, R Veltkamp1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To determine the rate of peri-interventional silent brain infarcts after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).
METHODS: In this prospective, uncontrolled single-center pilot study, consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing LAAO between July 2013 and January 2016 were included. The Amplatzer Cardiac Plug, WATCHMAN or Amulet device was used. A neurological examination and cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed within 48 h before and after the procedure. MRI was evaluated for new diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and white-matter lesions (WMLs).
RESULTS: Left atrial appendage occlusion was performed in 21 patients (mean age, 73.2 ± 9.5 years). Main reasons for LAAO were previous intracerebral hemorrhage (n = 11) and major systemic bleeding (n = 6). No clinically overt stroke occurred peri-interventionally. After the intervention, one patient had a small cerebellar hyperintensity on DWI (4.8%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0-14.3) that was not present on the MRI 1 day before the procedure. Among 11 patients with available MRI just before LAAO, there were no significant changes in the number of CMBs and the severity of WMLs after LAAO.
CONCLUSIONS: This study of peri-interventional MRI in LAAO suggests a low rate of silent peri-procedural infarcts in this elderly population. Confirmation in larger studies is needed.
© 2016 EAN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  left atrial appendage occlusion; magnetic resonance imaging; silent brain infarction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27647674     DOI: 10.1111/ene.13129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation : Present evidence, ongoing studies, open questions].

Authors:  K G Häusler; M Endres; U Landmesser
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Lack of silent cerebral ischemic events: a case series of patients after left atrial appendage closure.

Authors:  Christian Fastner; Michael Behnes; Thomas Henzler; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  [Left atrial appendage closure in non-valvular atrial fibrillation].

Authors:  K G Häusler; U Landmesser
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads.

Authors:  Prabhakaran P Gopalakrishnan; Loretta Gevenosky; Robert W W Biederman
Journal:  J Biomed Sci Eng       Date:  2021-03-09

Review 5.  Systematic review on left atrial appendage closure with the LAmbre device in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali; Angelos G Rigopoulos; Mammad Mammadov; Abdelrahman Torky; Andrea Auer; Marios Matiakis; Elena Abate; Constantinos Bakogiannis; Stergios Tzikas; Boris Bigalke; Daniel Sedding; Michel Noutsias
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 6.  Cerebral Protection Devices during Transcatheter Interventions: Indications, Benefits, and Limitations.

Authors:  Stephan Haussig; Axel Linke; Norman Mangner
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Asymptomatic Stroke in the Setting of Percutaneous Non-Coronary Intervention Procedures.

Authors:  Giovanni Ciccarelli; Francesca Renon; Renato Bianchi; Donato Tartaglione; Maurizio Cappelli Bigazzi; Francesco Loffredo; Paolo Golino; Giovanni Cimmino
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.