Literature DB >> 27646508

The design and conduct of Keep It Off: An online randomized trial of financial incentives for weight-loss maintenance.

Pamela A Shaw1,2,3, William S Yancy4,5, Lisa Wesby2,3, Victoria Ulrich2,3, Andrea B Troxel1,2,3, David Huffman2,6, Gary D Foster7,8, Kevin Volpp2,9,10,11.   

Abstract

Background Obesity continues to be a serious public health challenge. Rates are increasing worldwide, with nearly 70% of the US adults overweight or obese, leading to increased clinical and economic burden. While successful approaches for achieving weight loss have been identified, techniques for long-term maintenance of initial weight loss have largely been unsuccessful. Financial incentive interventions have been shown in several settings to be successful in motivating participants to adopt healthy behaviors. Purpose Keep It Off is a three-arm randomized controlled trial that compares the efficacy of a lottery-based incentive, traditional direct payment incentive, and control of daily feedback without any incentive for weight-loss maintenance. This design allows comparison of a traditional direct payment incentive with one based on behavioral economic principles that consider the underlying psychology of decision-making. Methods Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio for each active arm relative to control, with a targeted 188 participants in total. Eligible participants were those aged 30-80 who lost at least 11 lb (5 kg) during the first 4 months of participation in Weight Watchers, a national weight-loss program, with whom we partnered. The interventions lasted 6 months (Phase I); participants were followed for an additional 6 months without intervention (Phase II). The primary outcome is weight change from baseline to the end of Phase I, with the change at the end of Phase II a key secondary endpoint. Keep It Off is a pragmatic trial that recruited, consented, enrolled, and followed patients electronically. Participants were provided a wireless weight scale that electronically transmitted daily self-monitored weights. Weights were verified every 3 months at a Weight Watchers center local to the participant and electronically transmitted. Results Using the study web-based platform, we integrated recruitment, enrollment, and follow-up procedures into a digital platform that required little staff effort to implement and manage. We randomized 191 participants in less than 1 year. We describe the design of Keep It Off and implementation of enrollment. Lessons Learned We demonstrated that our pragmatic design was successful in rapid accrual of participants in a trial of interventions to maintain weight loss. Limitations Despite the nationwide reach of Weight Watchers, the generalizability of study findings may be limited by the characteristics of its members. The interventions under study are appropriate for settings where an entity, such as an employer or health insurance company, could offer them as a benefit. Conclusions Keep It Off was implemented and conducted with minimal staff effort. This study has the potential to identify a practical and effective weight-loss maintenance strategy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral economics; financial incentive; obesity; pragmatic trial; randomized trial; weight-loss maintenance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27646508      PMCID: PMC5300940          DOI: 10.1177/1740774516669679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  29 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Effects of low-carbohydrate vs low-fat diets on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alain J Nordmann; Abigail Nordmann; Matthias Briel; Ulrich Keller; William S Yancy; Bonnie J Brehm; Heiner C Bucher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-02-13

Review 3.  What are pragmatic trials?

Authors:  M Roland; D J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-24

4.  The Lie/Bet Questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers.

Authors:  E E Johnson; R Hamer; R M Nora; B Tan; N Eisenstein; C Engelhart
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1997-02

5.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The economic impact of obesity in the United States.

Authors:  Ross A Hammond; Ruth Levine
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 7.  Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Marion J Franz; Jeffrey J VanWormer; A Lauren Crain; Jackie L Boucher; Trina Histon; William Caplan; Jill D Bowman; Nicolas P Pronk
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2007-10

8.  Effect of Financial Incentives to Physicians, Patients, or Both on Lipid Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David A Asch; Andrea B Troxel; Walter F Stewart; Thomas D Sequist; James B Jones; AnneMarie G Hirsch; Karen Hoffer; Jingsan Zhu; Wenli Wang; Amanda Hodlofski; Antonette B Frasch; Mark G Weiner; Darra D Finnerty; Meredith B Rosenthal; Kelsey Gangemi; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet vs orlistat plus a low-fat diet for weight loss.

Authors:  William S Yancy; Eric C Westman; Jennifer R McDuffie; Steven C Grambow; Amy S Jeffreys; Jamiyla Bolton; Allison Chalecki; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-25

10.  Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Christopher D Gardner; Alexandre Kiazand; Sofiya Alhassan; Soowon Kim; Randall S Stafford; Raymond R Balise; Helena C Kraemer; Abby C King
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

1.  An online randomized controlled trial, with or without problem-solving treatment, for long-term cancer survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Karen L Syrjala; Jean C Yi; Samantha B Artherholt; Joan M Romano; Marie-Laure Crouch; Allison S Fiscalini; Mark T Hegel; Mary E D Flowers; Paul J Martin; Wendy M Leisenring
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Sustaining the reach of a scalable weight loss intervention through financial incentives- a pragmatic, feasibility, online randomized trial protocol.

Authors:  Tzeyu L Michaud; Paul A Estabrooks; Wen You; Todd J McGuire; Fabio Almeida; Kelly Karls; Kenya Love; Keyonna King; Jennie Hill; Jill Reed; Gwenndolyn Porter; Dejun Su
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 3.  Evidence and Challenges for Translation and Population Impact of the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors:  Ronald T Ackermann; Matthew J O'Brien
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Efficacy of telehealth acceptance and commitment therapy for weight loss: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jonathan B Bricker; Kristin E Mull; Brianna M Sullivan; Evan M Forman
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Acceptability of financial incentives for maintenance of weight loss in mid-older adults: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Bronwyn McGill; Blythe J O'Hara; Anne C Grunseit; Adrian Bauman; Dale Osborne; Luke Lawler; Philayrath Phongsavan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Financial incentive strategies for maintenance of weight loss: results from an internet-based randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  William S Yancy; Pamela A Shaw; Lisa Wesby; Victoria Hilbert; Lin Yang; Jingsan Zhu; Andrea Troxel; David Huffman; Gary D Foster; Alexis C Wojtanowski; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.097

7.  Log2Lose: Development and Lessons Learned From a Mobile Technology Weight Loss Intervention.

Authors:  Ryan Shaw; Corrine Voils; Erica Levine; Martin Streicher; Elizabeth Strawbridge; Jennifer Gierisch; Jane Pendergast; Sarah Hale; Shelby Reed; Megan McVay; Denise Simmons; William Yancy; Gary Bennett
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Effect of Financial Incentives and Environmental Strategies on Weight Loss in the Healthy Weigh Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Pamela A Shaw; Pui L Kwong; Ji Rebekah Choi; Annie Chung; Jingsan Zhu; Qian Erin Huang; Karen Hoffer; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01

9.  Effect of Escalating Financial Incentive Rewards on Maintenance of Weight Loss: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  William S Yancy; Pamela A Shaw; Catherine Reale; Victoria Hilbert; Jiali Yan; Jingsan Zhu; Andrea B Troxel; Gary D Foster; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-11-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.