PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of computed diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in cervical cancer and investigate the optimal b-value using computed DWI. METHODS: The present retrospective study involved 85 patients with cervical cancer in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB, IIA or IIB. DWI was obtained with b-values of 0, 100, 500 and 1000 s/mm2. Computed DWI with b-values of 800, 1000, 1300, 1600 and 2000 s/mm2 (cDWI800, cDWI1000, cDWI1300, cDWI1600, cDWI2000) were generated from all measured DWI (mDWI) data. Qualitatively, computed DWI was evaluated in terms of tumor conspicuity, signal suppression of the fat in the imaged area and total image quality by two radiologists independently with reference to mDWI with b-value of 1000 s/mm2. The b-value at which the signal of the endocervical canal was suppressed was recorded. Quantitatively, the signal intensities of tumor, myometrium, endocervical canal, endometrium, and gluteal subcutaneous fat were measured and represented as contrast ratios (CR). RESULTS: Regarding tumor conspicuity and total image quality, significantly higher scores were obtained at cDWI1300 and cDWI1600 compared to the others (post-hoc comparison, P < 0.001), except for the total image quality between cDWI1000 and cDWI1600 in one reader. Signal suppression of the fat was the worst at cDWI2000. The signal intensity of the endocervical canal was suppressed in 24/27 cases on cDWI1600 and in 26/27 cases on cDWI2000. The CRs of tumor to myometrium, cervix, and endometrium increased with higher b-values, while the CRs of tumor to fat decreased and were statistically significant (post-hoc comparison, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Computed DWI with the b-values of 1300 and 1600 would be suitable for the evaluation of cervical cancer due to good tumor conspicuity.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of computed diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in cervical cancer and investigate the optimal b-value using computed DWI. METHODS: The present retrospective study involved 85 patients with cervical cancer in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB, IIA or IIB. DWI was obtained with b-values of 0, 100, 500 and 1000 s/mm2. Computed DWI with b-values of 800, 1000, 1300, 1600 and 2000 s/mm2 (cDWI800, cDWI1000, cDWI1300, cDWI1600, cDWI2000) were generated from all measured DWI (mDWI) data. Qualitatively, computed DWI was evaluated in terms of tumor conspicuity, signal suppression of the fat in the imaged area and total image quality by two radiologists independently with reference to mDWI with b-value of 1000 s/mm2. The b-value at which the signal of the endocervical canal was suppressed was recorded. Quantitatively, the signal intensities of tumor, myometrium, endocervical canal, endometrium, and gluteal subcutaneous fat were measured and represented as contrast ratios (CR). RESULTS: Regarding tumor conspicuity and total image quality, significantly higher scores were obtained at cDWI1300 and cDWI1600 compared to the others (post-hoc comparison, P < 0.001), except for the total image quality between cDWI1000 and cDWI1600 in one reader. Signal suppression of the fat was the worst at cDWI2000. The signal intensity of the endocervical canal was suppressed in 24/27 cases on cDWI1600 and in 26/27 cases on cDWI2000. The CRs of tumor to myometrium, cervix, and endometrium increased with higher b-values, while the CRs of tumor to fat decreased and were statistically significant (post-hoc comparison, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Computed DWI with the b-values of 1300 and 1600 would be suitable for the evaluation of cervical cancer due to good tumor conspicuity.
The recent promotion of early detection program of cervical cancer has led to an increased detection of cervical cancer at an early stage.[1] In addition, the aging of pregnant women due to progress in the treatment of infertility has increased the demand for fertility-sparing surgical options such as radical trachelectomy. This procedure involves cervical amputation and excision of parametrial tissue with preservation of the uterine body and the ovaries.[2] Therefore, the accurate evaluation of tumor extent is critical to make a clinical decision and to select an optimal treatment.Advances in MRI techniques have improved the resolution and contrast of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and DWI is increasingly used in body imaging.[3] Several studies have reported that DWI could be successfully used for the staging of gynecologic cancer.[4-7] DWI can also improve diagnostic performances in respect of local invasion in cervical cancer.[8] One of the major drawbacks of DWI in the evaluation of cervical cancer lies in the high-signal intensity of endocervical canal even on DWI with a b-value of 1000 s/mm2. Sometimes this high signal of cervical canal prevents exact assessment of tumor extent in cervical cancer. We thus hypothesized that the high-signal intensity of a normal endocervical canal on DWI may be suppressed using DWI with higher b-values, since high-signal intensity is caused by T2 shine-through. If the tumor still remains conspicuous on DWI with high b-value, this may help with a better delineation of the cervical tumor.Recently, several studies have reported that computed DWI in the body makes it possible to obtain higher b-value images with a good signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to the effective suppression of background tissue.[9] In the matter of prostatic cancer, Ueno et al. have reported that computed DWI with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 appears to be more effective than measured original DWI with a b-value of 1000 s/mm2 for the detection of prostatic cancer.[10] An advantage of computed DWI is that images can be obtained without stress for the patients.The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of computed DWI in cervical cancer and investigate the optimal b-value using computed DWI with b-values of 800, 1000, 1300, 1600 and 2000 s/mm2.
Materials and Methods
Patients
The present retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of our institution, and written informed consent was waived. 164 consecutive patients with cervical cancer underwent MR examination at our institution for the assessment of local invasion between January 2010 and July 2014. The inclusion criteria were defined as follows: patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB, IIA and IIB pathologically confirmed by surgery or biopsy. Patients with FIGO stage IA were excluded due to the absence of detectable tumor on MR imaging, while patients with FIGO stage III and IV were excluded because of the difficulty to assess normal surrounding tissue such as endocervical canal, myometrium and endometrium in those patients. Of the 130 patients with stage IB, IIA and IIB, 45 of them were excluded due to the following reasons: strong artifact of DWI (n = 4), undetectable tumor at MRI (n = 27), and tumor with size inferior to 10 mm which was too small to place adequate regions of interest (ROIs) (n = 14). As a result, a total of 85 patients were included in this study. Patients’ ages ranged from 25 to 94 (mean age 53.3 ± 14.9). In total, 45 of the patients were in stage IB, two in stage IIA, and 38 in stage IIB. The pathological diagnosis were squamous cell carcinoma (n = 64), adenocarcinoma (n = 10), adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 5) and small cell carcinoma (n = 3), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 2) and carcinosarcoma (n = 1).
MR imaging technique
MR studies were performed using 3.0T MR units (MAGNETOM Skyra and MAGNETOM Trio; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and a 1.5T MR unit (MAGNETOM Avanto; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a multichannel phased array coil. 3.0T and 1.5T MR units were applied to 72 and 13 patients, respectively. Prior to MR examination, 20 mg of butylscopolamine was administered intramuscularly to reduce bowel peristalsis, unless contraindicated. Fast spin-echo T2 weighted images (WI) were acquired in sagittal, axial, and oblique axial planes, and spin-echo T1WI were acquired in a sagittal plane.Sagittal DWI were obtained in the same plane as T1WI and T2WI using a single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence (TR/TE = 4800/75 ms at 3.0T, TR/TE = 3000/70 ms at 1.5T; field of view (FOV) = 260 mm at 3.0T and 1.5T; slice thickness/intersection gap = 4 mm/1 mm at 3.0T and 1.5T; matrix size: 128 × 128 at 3.0T, 128 × 90 at 1.5T; motion-probing gradients: three directions with b-values of 0, 100, 500, 1000 s/mm2 at 3.0T and 1.5T; fat suppression technique: spectral adiabatic inversion recovery (SPAIR) at 3.0T and chemical shift selective (CHESS) at 1.5T; parallel imaging technique: generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) with an acceleration factor of 2 for both 3.0T and 1.5T).Following acquisition of these images, pre- and post-gadolinium enhanced axial T1WI with fat suppression, and contrast-enhanced sagittal spin-echo T1WI were acquired.
Computed DWI
By definition, the signal intensity on DWI exponentially attenuates with b-values based on a measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value. Therefore, computed DWI is a technique to generate high b-value DWI by extrapolating decaying signal with measured original DWI which is obtained by actual scan.[9] Based on the following signal model, we calculated ADC value from four measured DWI by nonlinear least square fitting using MATLAB (R2013b, The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) and generated computed DWI with b-values of 800, 1000, 1300, 1600 and 2000 s/mm2,[11]
where Sb and S0 corresponded to the signal intensities of a given b-value and that without applying any diffusion gradients, respectively.
Qualitative analysis
The image quality of DWI was independently scored by two radiologists (Y.K. and Y.H.), who have six and seven years of experience in female pelvic MRI respectively. Computed DWI with b-values of 800, 1000, 1300, 1600, and 2000 s/mm2 (cDWI800, cDWI1000, cDWI1300, cDWI1600, and cDWI2000) were evaluated with reference to measured DWI with a b-value of 1000 s/mm2 (mDWI1000) and T2WI on a representative slice showing cervical tumor. Evaluation points were tumor conspicuity, signal suppression of the fat in the imaged area, and total image quality. Tumor conspicuity and total image quality were scored on a 5-point scale as follows: 1, prominently poorer; 2, poorer; 3, equivalent; 4, better; 5, far better, when compared with mDWI1000. Signal suppression of the fat in the imaged area was scored on a 4-point scale as follows: 1, prominently poorer, indicating high-signal intensity of tissues with roughness; 2, poorer; 3, equal; 4, better, indicating well suppressed signals, compared with those of mDWI1000.In addition to the three imaging criteria mentioned above, the signal intensity of endocervical canal was also assessed in 27 out of 85 cases in which the endocervical canal was preserved. The signal was assessed on a representative slice showing the endocervical canal on computed DWI sets. The b-value at which the signal intensity of the endocervical canal was suppressed was recorded by both radiologists.
Quantitative analysis
The correlation coefficient for the signal intensities of tumor, myometrium, endocervical canal, endometrium, and gluteal subcutaneous fat on mDWI1000 and cDWI1000 was calculated in order to examine the equivalence between mDWI and cDWI.Contrast ratios (CRs) of tumor to the myometrium, tumor to endocervical canal, tumor to the endometrium and tumor to the gluteal subcutaneous fat were calculated using the following formula:
where SIA and SIB correspond to the mean values of two different tissues. CRs were compared among the cDWIs obtained with each of the five b-values. The signal intensities of the tumor, myometrium, and gluteal subcutaneous fat were measured in all 85 patient cases. The signal intensities of the endometrium were measured in 70 cases by excluding those with hematometra/pyometra (n = 7), submucosal myoma (n = 3), pregnancy (n = 2), cervical cancer with corpus invasion (n = 1), intrauterine device (n = 1) and thin endometrium (n = 1). The signal intensities of the endocervical canal were measured in the 27 patient cases, which were also included in the qualitative analysis.The degree of signal decay in the tumor and fat tissue between b-values of 800 and 2000 s/mm2 was calculated using the following formula:
where SIA(800) and SIA2000 correspond to the mean signal intensities of tumor or fat tissue on cDWI800 and cDWI2000, respectively.The signal intensity of each region indicated above was measured by placing freehand ROIs as large as possible. These ROIs were positioned in reference to T2WI and mDWI1000 by one of the authors (Y.M.), who has 6 years of experience in female pelvic MRI. The same ROIs were applied to all the cDWI sets. The mean value of each ROI was recorded.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using a commercially available software (MedCalc version 12.7.8.0, MedCalc Software, Belgium). Interobserver agreement on the qualitative analysis was assessed by weighted kappa test with quadratic weighting. The agreement in terms of kappa value was set as follows: <0.20 = poor agreement; 0.21–0.40 = fair agreement; 0.41–0.60 = moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80 = good agreement; 0.81–1.00 = excellent agreement.[12] The relationship between mDWI1000 and cDWI1000 was assessed by the scatter plot representation of the signal intensities of all ROIs (tumor, myometrium, endometrium, endocervical canal, and subcutaneous fat), and the correlation coefficient between mDWI1000 and cDWI1000 was calculated. The scores of qualitative analysis and the CRs for each b-value were compared using Friedman test. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. If significant differences were found, a post-hoc pairwise comparison was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction, and a P-value of <0.005 was considered statistically significant since ten pairs were compared.
Results
The scores for tumor conspicuity, signal suppression of the fat in the imaged area, and total image quality are summarized in Table 1. There were good inter-observer agreements between the two readers for tumor conspicuity (κ = 0.68), signal suppression of the fat in the imaged area (κ = 0.75), and total image quality (κ = 0.61). Regarding tumor conspicuity and total image quality, by post-hoc comparison, both readers assigned significantly higher scores on cDWI1300 and cDWI1600 compared to cDWI800, cDWI1000 and cDWI2000 (P <0.001), except for the total image quality between cDWI1000 and cDWI1600, where there was no significant difference for reader B (P = 0.059). There was no significant difference between cDWI1300 and cDWI1600 on both tumor conspicuity and total image quality. The scores associated with signal suppression of the fat in the imaged area decreased with b-values, and significantly higher scores were obtained on cDWI800 and cDWI1000 compared to cDWI1300, cDWI1600, and cDWI2000 (P <0.001).
Table 1.
The results of the scores for tumor conspicuity, signal suppression of the fat in the imaged area, and total image quality
b-value (s/mm2)
800
1000
1300
1600
2000
Tumor conspicuity
Reader 1
2.471
2.965
3.341
3.388
2.988
Reader 2
2.506
2.988
3.365
3.435
2.882
Signal suppression of the fat in the imaged area
Reader 1
3.082
3.000
2.224
1.906
1.435
Reader 2
3.012
3.000
2.188
1.765
1.224
Total image quality
Reader 1
2.553
2.953
3.341
3.365
2.824
Reader 2
2.682
3.000
3.376
3.188
2.318
The high-signal intensity of the endocervical canal was suppressed in 26 out of 27 cases with increasing b-values. Suppression of the signal intensity of the endocervical canal was observed on either cDWI1300 or cDWI1600 in most cases (Table 2). There was also a good inter-observer agreement between the two readers (κ = 0.78).
Table 2.
Suppression of the signal intensity of the endocervical canal
b-value (s/mm2)
800
1000
1300
1600
2000
Not suppressed
Reader 1
0
1
16
7
2
1
Reader 2
0
3
11
10
2
1
The correlation coefficient between the signal intensities on cDWI1000 and mDWI1000 was very high (R2 = 0.998). The linear regression slope of these two datasets was 1.02 (i.e. cDWI1000 = 1.02 × mDWI1000), which means that cDWI and mDWI were almost identical (Fig. 1).
Fig 1.
Scatter plots of the signal intensities of tumor, myometrium, endocervical canal, endometrium, and gluteal subcutaneous fat on measured DWI with a b-value of 1000 s/mm2 (mDWI1000) and computed DWI with a b-value of 1000 s/mm2 (cDWI1000). The correlation coefficient between mDWI1000 and cDWI1000 was very high (R2 = 0.998), and the linear regression slope was 1.02.
The CRs of each tissue combinations are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 2. The CRs of tumor to myometrium, tumor to cervix and tumor to endometrium increased with increasing b-values, while the CR of tumor to fat decreased. Post-hoc comparison revealed that there were significant differences between any pair of b-values in the CRs of each tissue (P <0.001 between each pair).
Table 3.
CRs of tumor to myometrium, endocervical canal, endometrium and fat
b-value (s/mm2)
800
1000
1300
1600
2000
tumor / myometrium
average
0.254
0.281
0.319
0.355
0.399
SD
0.117
0.119
0.127
0.141
0.162
tumor / endocervical canal
average
0.170
0.199
0.242
0.283
0.335
SD
0.092
0.081
0.082
0.100
0.134
tumor / endometrium
average
0.035
0.077
0.138
0.196
0.265
SD
0.131
0.133
0.153
0.183
0.225
tumor / fat
average
0.618
0.575
0.504
0.424
0.307
SD
0.073
0.080
0.094
0.113
0.144
Fig 2.
The average and standard deviation of the contrast ratios (CRs) of tumor to myometrium (a), tumor to cervix (b), tumor to endometrium (c) and tumor to fat (d) on computed diffusion weighted images are shown. The CR of tumor to myometrium, tumor to cervix and tumor to endometrium increased with increasing b-values, while the CR of tumor to fat decreased with increasing b-values.
Signal decay between cDWI800 and cDWI2000, for fat (Dfat: 12%) was lower than that for tumor (Dtumor: 61%). Representative cases are shown in Figs. 3 and 4.
Fig 3.
A 32-year-old woman with cervical cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, in FIGO stage IB. (a) mDWI1000, (b) cDWI800, (c) cDWI1000, (d) cDWI1300, (e) cDWI1600, and (f) cDWI2000 are shown. The border between tumor and endocervical canal was obscure on cDWI800, cDWI1000 and cDWI1300, whereas the signal intensity of endocervical canal was suppressed on cDWI1600 and cDWI2000. Importantly, however, the decreased signal intensity of tumor on cDWI2000 resulted in a decline in tumor conspicuity. The contrast between uterus and mesenteric fat is inverted at cDWI800 and cDWI2000.
Fig 4.
A 31-year-old woman with cervical cancer, adenosquamous carcinoma, in FIGO stage IB. (a) mDWI1000, (b) cDWI800, (c) cDWI1000, (d) cDWI1300, (e) cDWI1600, (f) cDWI2000 are shown. Both the endometrium and tumor showed high signal and appeared as continuous tissues. However, only the tumor was conspicuous on cDWI1300 and cDWI1600. In addition, the tumor showed lower signal intensity on cDWI2000 than that on cDWI1300.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, no prior study has used computed DWI for the clinical evaluation of cervical cancer. Our results showed that b-values of 1300 and 1600 s/mm2 are optimal for the visualization of cervical cancer with respect to the contrast between tumor and its surrounding normal tissue using computed DWI.The CRs of tumor to fat decreased with increasing b-values, while the CRs of tumor to normal uterine tissues increased. As our results showed that the degree of signal decay of fat was 12%, the signal intensity of fat tissue can be considered relatively constant and independent of variations in b-value. Therefore, a decrease in the CR of tumor to fat on computed DWI with high b-value depends mainly on the signal decay of the tumor. In the case of prostatic cancer, it was reported that periprostatic fat tissue became brighter on computed DWI with increasing b-value because the ADC value of fat tissue was often lower than that of tumor.[13] Our results on signal decay of tumor with increasing b-values were consistent with these previous results.The decrease in tumor signal with increasing b-values may also account for the discrepancy of the results between qualitative and quantitative analyses. In the qualitative assessment of tumor conspicuity, both cDWI1300 and cDWI1600 were assigned high scores. However, the CRs of tumor to normal uterine tissues increased with increasing b-values. This discrepancy may be due to the signal decay of tumor with high b-values, as already mentioned above. On cDWI2000, the signal decay of the tumor may have a larger impact on tumor conspicuity than an elevated CR of tumor to myometrium. In addition, since tumor signal decreases with increasing b-values, the increase of CRs may be explained by a greater signal decay of the normal uterine tissues compared to that of tumors.The endocervical canal usually shows a high signal on mDWI1000. In such cases, it was difficult to detect tumor invasion along the endocervical canal on mDWI1000. The present study thus suggests that the signal intensity of the endocervical canal was suppressed on computed DWI with high b-values, i.e., 24/27 cases at a b-value of 1600 s/mm2. Moreover, if the signal intensity of endocervical canal is not suppressed on cDWI1300 or cDWI1600, cDWI2000 can be available without extra scan and may be helpful. If computed DWI was introduced into clinical settings, this tool may help to determine the indication of fertility-sparing surgery such as trachelectomy. Because the extent of resection is limited in trachelectomy, the indication of patients is strictly limited to those with a tumor size inferior to 2 cm in maximum dimension and those with a distance of at least 1cm between the tumor and the internal os. The high-signal intensity of the endocervical canal on mDWI1000 related to T2 shine-through effect may be excluded also on ADC map, but it is difficult to assess tumor invasion to cervical stroma on ADC map because cervical stroma also shows low signal intensity on ADC map. DWI makes it easy to detect tumors and has broad utility such as fusion with T2WI and maximum intensity projection (MIP) of diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS).[8,14]To the best of our knowledge, there has been no previous report on the utility of DWI with b-values above 1000 s/mm2 for the evaluation of cervical cancer. Our results suggest that computed DWI with b-values of 1300 and 1600 s/mm2 would be appropriate to visualize cervical cancer. In the context of prostate cancer, a number of studies have investigated the appropriate b-values to detect tumors with the use of b-values greater than 1000 s/mm2 with or without computed DWI.[10,13,15-22] Though the optimal b-value is still controversial in prostate cancer, higher b-values of 1500 or 2000 s/mm2 are supposed to be useful. In contrast, in the context of cervical cancer, our results suggested that a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 should not be recommended. One reason for this difference stems from surrounding tissues, such as myometrium and parametrium. These surrounding tissues may tend to show low intensity compared to prostate on DWI, even when b-values are inferior to 2000. In addition, there is a difference in the type of cancer pathology. Prostate cancer consists of adenocarcinoma whereas cervical cancer mainly consists of squamous cell carcinoma, and the ADC value of squamous cell carcinoma tends to be lower than that of adenocarcinoma.[23,24] This difference may affect the appropriate b-value in each type of cancer.Our study has a few limitations. First, a precise correlation with pathological specimen was not performed, as some cases were confirmed by biopsy and treated with chemoradiotherapy. However, since the focus of the study was the signal intensity of the tumor, this should not have affected the results. Secondly, small lesions less than 10 mm were excluded, and this may have led to a certain bias in case selection. With the use of high resolution DWI, smaller tumor may also be included in the next step. Thirdly, our study included both 1.5T and 3.0T MR units. It is reported that no significant difference in ADC in upper abdominal organs except for some cases.[25] However, the increase of SNR at 3T units may have some impact on image quality of computed DWI, and further study is required on this aspect.In conclusion, computed DWI with b-values of 1300 or 1600 is significantly superior to computed DWI with b-values of 800, 1000 or 2000 in terms of tumor conspicuity and total image quality. Computed DWI with b-values of 1300 or 1600 may thus be recommended for the clinical evaluation of the extent of cervical cancer.
Authors: Hubert Bickel; Stephan H Polanec; Georg Wengert; Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Isaac Daimiel Naranjo; Roberto Lo Gullo; Carolina Saccarelli; Sunitha B Thakur; Almir Bitencourt; Elizabeth A Morris; Maxine S Jochelson; Varadan Sevilimedu; Danny F Martinez; Katja Pinker-Domenig Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 5.315