Literature DB >> 22114239

Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Peter Beddy1, Penelope Moyle, Masako Kataoka, Adam K Yamamoto, Ilse Joubert, David Lomas, Robin Crawford, Evis Sala.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging in evaluating the depth of myometrial invasion and overall stage in patients with endometrial cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study; patient consent was not required. From May 2008 to February 2010, 48 women with endometrial cancer underwent preoperative MR imaging, including T1- and T2-weighted imaging, DW MR imaging (b=0 and 800 sec/mm2) and DCE MR imaging. Two radiologists independently interpreted the depth of myometrial invasion, overall stage, and presence of pitfalls associated with inaccurate assessment of myometrial invasion at T1- and T2-weighted imaging, DW MR imaging, and DCE MR imaging. Myometrial invasion and overall stage were compared by using the McNemar test, and κ statistics were used for reader agreement.
RESULTS: For assessing the depth of myometrial invasion, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, were as follows: DW MR imaging-reader 1, 90%, 84%, and 100%; reader 2, 85%, 84%, and 88%; DCE MR imaging-reader 1, 71%, 61%, and 88%; reader 2, 79%, 77%, and 82%. The improvement in diagnostic accuracy for reader 1 was significant (P=.035). For myometrial invasion, κ values were 0.75 with DW MR imaging and 0.26 with DCE MR imaging. There was no association between inaccurate assessment of myometrial invasion and standard pitfalls with DW MR imaging. Readers 1 and 2 correctly staged more patients by using DW MR imaging (39 and 38 patients, respectively) than by using DCE MR imaging (29 and 30 patients, respectively) (P<.05). For overall stage, κ values were 0.74 with DW MR imaging and 0.22 with DCE MR imaging.
CONCLUSION: DW MR imaging has superior diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of myometrial invasion and significantly higher staging accuracy compared with DCE MR imaging. © RSNA, 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22114239     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  40 in total

1.  Endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Gigin Lin; Yu-Ting Huang; Angel Chao; Yu-Chun Lin; Lan-Yan Yang; Ren-Chin Wu; Hsin-Ying Lu; Shu-Hang Ng; Koon-Kwan Ng; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Quantitative assessment of diffusion kurtosis imaging depicting deep myometrial invasion: a comparative analysis with diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Jia-Cheng Song; Shan-Shan Lu; Jing Zhang; Xi-Sheng Liu; Cheng-Yan Luo; Ting Chen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  An analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in the myometrium of normal uterus between the menopausal and premenopausal phases.

Authors:  Bo Chen; Zhibo Xiao; Furong Lv; Fajin Lv; Bo Sheng; Xiaolin Shi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management.

Authors:  Sinead H McEvoy; Stephanie Nougaret; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Christine O Menias; Fuki Shitano; Shinya Fujii; Ramon E Sosa; Joanna G Escalon; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-10

5.  Pre-operative MRI staging of endometrial cancer in a multicentre cancer network: can we match single centre study results?

Authors:  N D Soneji; N Bharwani; A Ferri; V Stewart; A Rockall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  ADC maps in the prediction of pelvic lymph nodal metastatic regions in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Gilda Rechichi; Stefania Galimberti; Matteo Oriani; Patrizia Perego; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating endometrial carcinoma from benign lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yashar Moharamzad; Amir H Davarpanah; Ali Yaghobi Joybari; Fatemeh Shahbazi; Leila Esmaeilian Toosi; Melika Kooshkiforooshani; Ali Ansari; Morteza Sanei Taheri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-15

8.  Preoperative staging of endometrial cancer using reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Takashi Ota; Masatoshi Hori; Hiromitsu Onishi; Makoto Sakane; Takahiro Tsuboyama; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Atsushi Nakamoto; Tadashi Kimura; Yoshifumi Narumi; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Functional MR Imaging Techniques in Oncology in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Application of FLASH-3D dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Lixin Du; Xiaohu Li; Xixiong Qiu; Xiaolei Liu; Yuli Wang; Yongqiang Yu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.